06.08.2015 Views

Statewide Quality Assurance Report

Child Welfare Services Statewide Quality Assurance Report - Florida ...

Child Welfare Services Statewide Quality Assurance Report - Florida ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Florida Department of Children and FamiliesCase Management Services - 2009-2010 <strong>Quality</strong> <strong>Assurance</strong> <strong>Report</strong>StdNum Question Q2 Q3 Q4 AnnualAll immediate and emerging safety concerns were addressed and8.0 additional needed interventions were provided to protect the child. 77% 74% 77% 76%9.0A thorough safety assessment of the home was completed prior toreunification or placement of the child in an unlicensed out-of-homecare setting. 74% 73% 76% 74%10.0Concerted efforts were made during post-placement supervision tomanage the risks following reunification and prevent re-entry into outof-homecare. 74% 75% 74% 74%11.0The child remained safe in his/her home after being discharged fromout-of-home care and did not re-enter out-of-home care at least 12months following discharge. 62% 85% 66% 70%12.0A multi-disciplinary staffing/assessment for placement planning wasconducted before each placement to ensure the placement or movewas unavoidable. 59% 57% 65% 60%13.0The child's current placement is stable and appropriate to meet thechild's needs with no apparent or significant risks or projections ofdisruption. 92% 95% 90% 92%14.0Concerted efforts were made to identify, locate and evaluate otherpotential relatives and possible permanent placements for the child. 79% 80% 77% 79%15.0The child experienced no more than two out-of-home care placementsettings during the period under review. 87% 85% 89% 87%16.0If No was entered for #15, all placement changes were planned in aneffort to achieve the child's case goals or to meet the needs of thechild. 46% 48% 60% 50%17.0In cases involving a child in a licensed placement setting, an exitinterview was conducted with the child when moved from oneplacement to another, and appropriate action was taken if the exitinterview documented a concern. 75% 80% 81% 78%17.1An exit interview was conducted with the child when he/she wasmoved from one placement to another to discuss the previousplacement experience. 78% 79% 81% 79%17.2Appropriate action was taken if the exit interview documented aconcern. 68% 74% 70% 71%18.0 The parents were notified of all the child's placement changes. 76% 76% 77% 77%19.0The court was informed of the child's placements and reasons forchanges in placement. 91% 86% 91% 90%19.1 The court was informed of the number and type of placement. 93% 88% 91% 91%19.2 The court was informed of the reason for the change in placement. 86% 82% 90% 86%20.0Qualitative supervisory reviews and follow through were conducted asneeded and required. 50% 48% 51% 50%20.1 Reviews were completed quarterly 76% 77% 75% 76%20.2Supervisor considered all aspects of the child's safety, well-being andpermanency. 63% 60% 62% 61%20.3Supervisor ensured follow through on guidance and direction ordocumented the reasons the guidance and direction were no longernecessary. 49% 46% 51% 49%21.0 The case record contained a current (not expired) case plan. 73% 76% 73% 74%<strong>Statewide</strong> <strong>Quality</strong> of Practice Findings by Quarter FY 2008/2009 continuedOffice of Family Safety | Page 60

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!