19.08.2015 Views

Korea Credit Guarantee Fund and Its Contribution to the Korean Economy

Korea Credit Guarantee Fund and Its Contribution to the Korean ...

Korea Credit Guarantee Fund and Its Contribution to the Korean ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Korea</strong> <strong>Credit</strong> <strong>Guarantee</strong> <strong>Fund</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Its</strong> <strong>Contribution</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Korea</strong>n <strong>Economy</strong>pp. 97-126<strong>Korea</strong> <strong>Credit</strong> <strong>Guarantee</strong> <strong>Fund</strong> <strong>and</strong><strong>Its</strong> <strong>Contribution</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Korea</strong>n <strong>Economy</strong>Yong Pyung ParkInternational Affairs Office<strong>Korea</strong> <strong>Credit</strong> <strong>Guarantee</strong> <strong>Fund</strong> (KODIT)AbstractSmall <strong>and</strong> medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) serve as <strong>the</strong> root of <strong>the</strong> national economy.However, SMEs suffer from limited access <strong>to</strong> financing due <strong>to</strong> high administrative costs ofsmall-scale lending, asymmetric information, high risks attributed <strong>to</strong> SMEs <strong>and</strong> deficiency incollateral. In order <strong>to</strong> alleviate this problem, <strong>Korea</strong> <strong>Credit</strong> <strong>Guarantee</strong> <strong>Fund</strong> (KODIT) wasfounded in June 1976 by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Korea</strong> <strong>Credit</strong> <strong>Guarantee</strong> <strong>Fund</strong> Act. <strong>Its</strong> objective is <strong>to</strong> lead <strong>the</strong>balanced development of <strong>the</strong> economy by extending credit guarantees for SMEs that have futureprospects but lack tangible collateral <strong>and</strong> by stimulating sound credit transactions through <strong>the</strong>efficient management of credit information.KODIT is a public financial institution providing comprehensive supports for SMEs. Withits capital fund of USD 3.2 billion, KODIT provides 11 types of general credit guarantees <strong>and</strong>P-CBO guarantee. As of <strong>the</strong> end of 2005, <strong>the</strong> outst<strong>and</strong>ing credit guarantee reached over USD31.6 billion. In addition, KODIT operates credit information management, guarantee-combinedinvestment, credit insurance, management consulting <strong>and</strong> infrastructure credit guaranteeservices.Throughout its his<strong>to</strong>ry, KODIT has actively supported <strong>the</strong> SMEs of <strong>Korea</strong>, <strong>the</strong>rebypromoting economic vitality, easing <strong>the</strong> inequalities within <strong>the</strong> economy <strong>and</strong> instilling <strong>the</strong>importance of credit. In particular, KODIT played a crucial role in reviving <strong>the</strong> economy byimplementing government policies at every financial crisis <strong>and</strong> stabilizing <strong>the</strong> market. <strong>Its</strong>contribution was clearly shown in <strong>the</strong> studies that proved production inducement, economicvalue added inducement <strong>and</strong> job creation effect of credit guarantee service.Upon its 30-year anniversary, KODIT is preparing for ano<strong>the</strong>r springboard for <strong>the</strong> future.Under its new corporate vision “HOPE-KODIT,’’ it strives <strong>to</strong> attain healthy capital structure,97


optimal SME support policy, professional workforce <strong>and</strong> ethical operation. Through continuousinnovation efforts, KODIT aims <strong>to</strong> remain as <strong>the</strong> trustworthy partner of SMEs <strong>and</strong> contribute <strong>to</strong>fur<strong>the</strong>r economic growth of <strong>Korea</strong>.Key words : <strong>Credit</strong> guarantee system, Small <strong>and</strong> medium enterprises (SMEs), <strong>Korea</strong> <strong>Credit</strong><strong>Guarantee</strong> <strong>Fund</strong>, KODITI. Introduction<strong>Credit</strong> guarantee scheme is widely used in various countries, both in underdeveloped <strong>and</strong>developed countries. It is reported that over 2,250 schemes exist in various forms in almost 100countries (Green, 2003). <strong>Credit</strong> guarantee also boasts of a long his<strong>to</strong>ry, which dates back <strong>to</strong> 3B.C., as it was written in <strong>the</strong> ancient Mesopotamia clay tablets (KODIT, 1998). Today <strong>the</strong> creditguarantee system of each country comes in different shapes, reflecting <strong>the</strong> his<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> socioeconomicdevelopment stage of <strong>the</strong> country. Even countries in a similar stage of economicdevelopment or in geographical proximity may be operating different type of systems. Thus, itis hard <strong>to</strong> draw a definition of credit guarantee that exists in a wide variety of forms. Yet, it iswidely accepted that credit guarantee system attempts <strong>to</strong> overcome <strong>the</strong> credit marketimperfection which disadvantaged groups—notably <strong>the</strong> small <strong>and</strong> medium enterprises(SMEs)—are experiencing in getting formal loans, by allowing lenders <strong>to</strong> shift loan recoveryrisks <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> guarantee program (Vogel & Adams,1997). It is generally said that <strong>the</strong> creditlimitation of SMEs stems from high administrative costs of small-scale lending 1 , asymmetricinformation, <strong>the</strong> high risk attributed <strong>to</strong> SMEs <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir deficiency in collateral 2 . Such lack ofcredit restricts <strong>the</strong> growth of SMEs <strong>and</strong> causes regionally-unbalanced growth, waste ofentrepreneurial resources, under-investment, which ultimately hinders <strong>the</strong> economic vigor <strong>and</strong><strong>the</strong> long-term development of <strong>the</strong> national economy.Many nations have made various efforts <strong>to</strong> alleviate <strong>the</strong>se problems caused by SMEslimited access <strong>to</strong> credit, one of <strong>the</strong>m being <strong>the</strong> credit guarantee system. The <strong>Korea</strong>n governmentfounded <strong>Korea</strong> <strong>Credit</strong> <strong>Guarantee</strong> <strong>Fund</strong> (KODIT) 3 in June 1976 in order <strong>to</strong> tackle this problem.1 Generally, <strong>the</strong> administrative cost of ten USD 10,000 loans is higher than that of one USD 100,000 loan.2 Green Anke, op. cit.3 Upon its 30 th anniversary, <strong>Korea</strong> <strong>Credit</strong> <strong>Guarantee</strong> <strong>Fund</strong> changed its acronym <strong>to</strong> KODIT, which comes from <strong>Korea</strong><strong>and</strong><strong>Credit</strong>.98


<strong>Korea</strong> <strong>Credit</strong> <strong>Guarantee</strong> <strong>Fund</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Its</strong> <strong>Contribution</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Korea</strong>n <strong>Economy</strong>pp. 97-126The establishment purpose of KODIT can be found in article 1 of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Korea</strong> <strong>Credit</strong> <strong>Guarantee</strong><strong>Fund</strong> Act, which clearly prescribed that KODIT was established <strong>to</strong> facilitate <strong>the</strong> financing ofenterprises by guaranteeing <strong>the</strong> obligations of business enterprises which lack collateral, <strong>and</strong> <strong>to</strong>contribute <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> balanced development of <strong>the</strong> national economy by establishing sound credi<strong>to</strong>rder through <strong>the</strong> efficient management <strong>and</strong> use of credit information. Over <strong>the</strong> last 30 years,KODIT has provided credit guarantees <strong>to</strong> promising SMEs, <strong>the</strong>reby creating more employment<strong>and</strong> generating more economic added value. Lately, KODIT played a crucial role in <strong>the</strong>recovery process after <strong>the</strong> financial crisis.This article aims <strong>to</strong> give an overview of KODIT’s services <strong>and</strong> operation. First, it willreview background behind KODIT’s establishment <strong>and</strong> its past 30 year his<strong>to</strong>ry, followed by adescription of present operation of KODIT <strong>and</strong> its performance. Lastly, it will introduce <strong>the</strong>innovation efforts of KODIT <strong>and</strong> its vision for <strong>the</strong> future.II. The small <strong>and</strong> medium enterprises in <strong>Korea</strong>The role of SMEs can be assessed from an economic <strong>and</strong> a social point of view (Kim, 2006).First, from an economic point of view, SMEs participate in <strong>the</strong> market <strong>and</strong> play an importantrole in <strong>the</strong> operation of market mechanism. SMEs that possess flexibility <strong>and</strong> innovativenesscan also swiftly respond <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> changes in consumption trends in <strong>the</strong> market, <strong>the</strong>rebystreng<strong>the</strong>ning national competitiveness <strong>and</strong> facilitating future economic growth. Second, from asocial point of view, SMEs enhance social stability. SMEs account for over 87% of <strong>the</strong> <strong>to</strong>talemployment. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, SMEs alleviate <strong>the</strong> concentration <strong>to</strong>ward large enterprises within <strong>the</strong>economic structure. And since most of <strong>the</strong> SMEs are regionally dispersed, <strong>the</strong>y alleviate <strong>the</strong>inequality among regions.Recognizing <strong>the</strong>ir socio-economic importance, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Korea</strong>n government put unsparingefforts <strong>to</strong> support SMEs. For <strong>the</strong> effective implementation of SME policy, <strong>the</strong> legal definition ofSMEs is indispensable. In <strong>Korea</strong>, definition of SMEs is made based on <strong>the</strong> following criteria 4 .- The definition of SMEs is based on <strong>the</strong> number of employees <strong>and</strong> capital, or <strong>the</strong> numberof employees <strong>and</strong> sales, differentiated by industrial sec<strong>to</strong>r.- For instance, a manufacturing company with less than 300 employees or capital less than4 The definition of SMEs is prescribed in <strong>the</strong> Act on Small <strong>and</strong> Medium Enterprises <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> enforcement regulation. Themost recent definition was revised in November 2005.99


8 million dollars is defined as SME.- On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r h<strong>and</strong>, a wholesale <strong>and</strong> retail company with less than 100 employees <strong>and</strong>sales less than 10 million dollars is defines as SME.Table 1Definition of SMEs.Source: Article 2 of Framework Act on SMEs, Article 3 of Enforcement Decree of <strong>the</strong> Act100


<strong>Korea</strong> <strong>Credit</strong> <strong>Guarantee</strong> <strong>Fund</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Its</strong> <strong>Contribution</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Korea</strong>n <strong>Economy</strong>pp. 97-126The current statistics on <strong>Korea</strong>n SMEs clearly shows <strong>the</strong>ir importance in <strong>the</strong> nationaleconomy. As of <strong>the</strong> end of 2004, <strong>the</strong> number of SMEs is around 3 million, which account forover 99.8% of all business enterprises.Table 2Number of business enterprises <strong>and</strong> employeesSource: <strong>Korea</strong> National Statistical Office, Basic Business Statistics AlmanacSMEs produce over 48.6% of <strong>the</strong> <strong>to</strong>tal production <strong>and</strong> are responsible for almost 50% of<strong>the</strong> <strong>to</strong>tal economic added value.Table 3Production <strong>and</strong> economic value added(Unit : billion KRW)Source : <strong>Korea</strong> Federation of Small <strong>and</strong> Medium Businesses, Statistics on SME101


III. The his<strong>to</strong>ry of KODITA. Introduction of credit guarantee systemThe beginning of <strong>the</strong> credit guarantee system in <strong>Korea</strong> is traced back <strong>to</strong> 1961 when <strong>the</strong>credit guarantee reserve system was first introduced. But <strong>the</strong> <strong>Korea</strong>n government’s effort <strong>to</strong>facilitate <strong>the</strong> credit guarantee system became unsuccessful, due <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> passive operation ofcredit guarantees by delegated banks. From <strong>the</strong> 1970s, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Korea</strong>n government started <strong>to</strong>implement diverse policies in order <strong>to</strong> support <strong>the</strong> SME sec<strong>to</strong>r, which had been neglected during<strong>the</strong> rapid economic development process. Against this backdrop, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Korea</strong> <strong>Credit</strong> <strong>Guarantee</strong><strong>Fund</strong> Act was promulgated in December 1974, followed by <strong>the</strong> establishment of KODIT in June1976.The establishment of KODIT is meaningful in <strong>the</strong> following aspects. First, it marked <strong>the</strong>beginning of credit guarantee operated by a separate entity. Before KODIT, several commercialbanks carried out credit guarantee services but were allowed <strong>to</strong> provide guarantee only within<strong>the</strong> pre-arranged limit. With <strong>the</strong> establishment of KODIT, credit guarantee liability that used <strong>to</strong>be limited <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> credit guarantee reserve of <strong>the</strong> delegated bank became unrestricted, whichgreatly improved <strong>the</strong> creditability of <strong>the</strong> system <strong>and</strong> helped <strong>the</strong> expansion of <strong>the</strong> system.Second, an au<strong>to</strong>nomous credit guarantee policy was set up, which laid <strong>the</strong> foundation forspecialization <strong>and</strong> consistency in <strong>the</strong> system. This led <strong>to</strong> a vast improvement in <strong>the</strong> scheme,which could not be expected in <strong>the</strong> delegated system of <strong>the</strong> past. Third, it gave new meaning <strong>to</strong>credit in commercial transactions. Before KODIT, credit meant personal friendship or tangiblecollateral. But since <strong>the</strong> establishment of KODIT, <strong>the</strong> creditability of a business enterprise hasbeen assessed by KODIT in terms of future business prospect, repayment ability <strong>and</strong> possiblecontribution <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> domestic economy. This feature of KODIT led <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> establishment of <strong>the</strong>sound credit order in <strong>the</strong> society.B. Early stage (1976~1980)Since <strong>the</strong> establishment of KODIT, <strong>the</strong> credit guarantee system of <strong>Korea</strong> made a rapidprogress. When KODIT was founded in 1976, 15 years after <strong>the</strong> launch of <strong>the</strong> credit guaranteereserve system in 1961, <strong>the</strong> capital fund was KRW 32 billion <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> outst<strong>and</strong>ing creditguarantee was KRW 101 billion. However, in just 4 years since <strong>the</strong> founding of KODIT, <strong>the</strong>capital fund reached KRW 135 billion <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> outst<strong>and</strong>ing credit guarantee s<strong>to</strong>od at KRW 1.2trillion. That is <strong>the</strong> capital fund <strong>and</strong> outst<strong>and</strong>ing credit guarantee increased 3.2 times <strong>and</strong> 12.4102


<strong>Korea</strong> <strong>Credit</strong> <strong>Guarantee</strong> <strong>Fund</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Its</strong> <strong>Contribution</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Korea</strong>n <strong>Economy</strong>pp. 97-126times, respectively, since its foundation. Such achievement proved that <strong>the</strong> credit guaranteesystem operated by an independent entity enabled a more active provision of credit guarantees.This also owed <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> perception of financial institutions <strong>and</strong> business enterpriseson credit guarantee system was greatly enhanced. In addition, with its given au<strong>to</strong>nomy inoperating <strong>the</strong> system, KODIT was able <strong>to</strong> implement several changes in credit guaranteeprograms. <strong>Guarantee</strong> for loans from non-banking financial institution <strong>and</strong> guarantee for leaseswere newly adopted. And <strong>the</strong> revolving guarantee program 5 which enhanced <strong>the</strong> convenience ofcredit guarantee users were launched.Table 4Business performance in <strong>the</strong> early stage(Unit : billion KRW)C. Overcoming <strong>the</strong> second Oil Shock <strong>and</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r development (1981~1989)KODIT, which had recorded steady growth since its establishment, faced a big challengefrom <strong>the</strong> late 1970s <strong>to</strong> early 1980s. During that time, <strong>the</strong> political turmoil as well as <strong>the</strong> secondOil Shock led <strong>to</strong> a dramatic increase in its credit guarantee default ratio 6 . The default ratio,which had remained at 2~3% soared up <strong>to</strong> 7.6% in 1980. In addition, <strong>the</strong> steady increase incredit guarantee provision led <strong>to</strong> large scale of payment under guarantee. As a result, KODITrecorded its first net loss in 1981, which seriously hindered its payment ability. In order <strong>to</strong>overcome <strong>the</strong> crisis, KODIT switched its focus <strong>to</strong> a selected support for SMEs. At <strong>the</strong> same5 Under <strong>the</strong> revolving guarantee program, a business enterprise can request credit guarantee any time when it requiresfinancing, within <strong>the</strong> pre-arranged credit line.6 Default ratio = credit guarantee default amount / outst<strong>and</strong>ing credit guarantee.103


time, it implemented measures <strong>to</strong> boost <strong>the</strong> collection of payment <strong>and</strong> <strong>to</strong> cut operationalexpenses. The <strong>Korea</strong>n government made contribution of 25 billion KRW for <strong>the</strong> first time since<strong>the</strong> establishment of KODIT, <strong>the</strong>reby enhancing <strong>the</strong> payment ability of KODIT <strong>and</strong>demonstrating <strong>the</strong> strong will of <strong>the</strong> government <strong>to</strong> bring <strong>the</strong> credit guarantee system back <strong>to</strong>normal. Such collective effort of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Korea</strong>n government <strong>and</strong> KODIT enabled <strong>the</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>rdevelopment of <strong>the</strong> credit guarantee system. In <strong>the</strong> 1980s, along with <strong>the</strong> economic growth of<strong>Korea</strong>, <strong>the</strong> credit guarantee system witnessed progress as well. Especially during this period, <strong>the</strong>SME policy started <strong>to</strong> be regarded not just as a measure <strong>to</strong> protect <strong>the</strong> disadvantaged SMEs, butas an indispensable <strong>to</strong>ol for <strong>the</strong> balanced economic growth. As <strong>the</strong> importance of SMEs wasnewly recognized by <strong>the</strong> government, credit guarantee became one of <strong>the</strong> major <strong>to</strong>ols ingovernment s SME policy. In line with this, KODIT also overhauled its guarantee system <strong>to</strong>accommodate <strong>the</strong> change in government’s policy. Before this period, <strong>the</strong> commercial bankswere reluctant <strong>to</strong> use credit guarantees, because of <strong>the</strong> obligation <strong>to</strong> collect guarantee-backedloans first in case of default. Such obligation as well as <strong>the</strong> duty <strong>to</strong> implement follow-upmanagement was abolished. These changes laid <strong>the</strong> foundation for guarantee provision on alarger scale. As a result, in 1986 <strong>the</strong> outst<strong>and</strong>ing credit guarantee reached over KRW 2 trillion<strong>and</strong> in a mere 2 years, <strong>the</strong> amount reached over KRW 3 trillion.Table 5Business performance in <strong>the</strong> 1980s(Unit : billion KRW)104


<strong>Korea</strong> <strong>Credit</strong> <strong>Guarantee</strong> <strong>Fund</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Its</strong> <strong>Contribution</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Korea</strong>n <strong>Economy</strong>pp. 97-126D. Economic reform <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> credit guarantee system (1990~1997)KODIT, which had recorded stable growth thanks <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> booming economy in <strong>the</strong> 1980s,witnessed fur<strong>the</strong>r growth in <strong>the</strong> 1990s. In 1993, <strong>the</strong> newly elected government implemented aneconomic reform. And as part of such reform, it actively supported <strong>the</strong> SME sec<strong>to</strong>r throughcredit guarantee. Accordingly, <strong>the</strong> outst<strong>and</strong>ing credit guarantee more than doubled in just 4years from KRW 3.9 trillion in 1989 <strong>to</strong> KRW 8.5 trillion in 1993. However, <strong>the</strong> increase incredit guarantee provision led <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> increase in payment under guarantee as well. And in order<strong>to</strong> assure <strong>the</strong> sound management of <strong>the</strong> system, <strong>the</strong> government made a large amount ofcontribution <strong>to</strong> KODIT. In 1994 <strong>and</strong> 1995, <strong>the</strong> governmental contribution was KRW 240 billion<strong>and</strong> KRW 290 billion, respectively. Considering <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> tax revenues in <strong>the</strong>corresponding period were KRW 43 trillion <strong>and</strong> KRW 52 trillion, <strong>the</strong> amount of governmentalcontributions were quite considerable. The contribution from financial institution was alsoraised <strong>to</strong> secure financial resources for credit guarantee. During <strong>the</strong> process, however, <strong>the</strong> highoperational costs incurred in operating <strong>the</strong> credit guarantee system came under criticism.Never<strong>the</strong>less, <strong>the</strong> policy effectiveness of credit guarantee was proved, which laid <strong>the</strong> foundationfor <strong>the</strong> active use of credit guarantee after financial crisis in 1997.Table 6Business performance in <strong>the</strong> 1990s(Unit : billion KRW)105


E. Overcoming <strong>the</strong> financial crisis <strong>and</strong> afterwards (1998~present)In 1997, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Korea</strong>n economy was hit by <strong>the</strong> financial crisis. Because of <strong>the</strong> recession aswell as <strong>the</strong> change in government policy which refrained from placing protectionistic measures<strong>to</strong>ward companies, large conglomerates defaulted at an unprecedented level. The default of suchlarge business enterprises led <strong>to</strong> chain-reaction bankruptcies of <strong>the</strong>ir contrac<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>and</strong> financialinstitutions as well. In <strong>the</strong> mean time, <strong>the</strong> Asian monetary crisis which started in July 1997 inThail<strong>and</strong> affected <strong>the</strong> depreciation of <strong>Korea</strong>n Won. During <strong>the</strong> process, <strong>the</strong> foreign reserves of<strong>the</strong> Bank of <strong>Korea</strong> were depleted <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Korea</strong>n government had <strong>to</strong> seek financial assistancefrom <strong>the</strong> International Monetary <strong>Fund</strong>. Amid <strong>the</strong> financial crisis, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Korea</strong>n economy recordednegative growth in 1998 for <strong>the</strong> first time since 1980. With massive lay-offs caused by chainreactionbankruptcies <strong>and</strong> falling consumption, <strong>the</strong> financing of business enterprises greatlyaggravated. The financial market was stalled, which led <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> vicious circle of bankruptcies. Inorder <strong>to</strong> overcome <strong>the</strong> financial crisis, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Korea</strong>n government laid out policies for swiftrecovery, in which KODIT played a crucial role. In addition <strong>to</strong> credit guarantees for SMEs,KODIT also provided special guarantees <strong>to</strong> res<strong>to</strong>re economic vitality in <strong>the</strong> market. Specialguarantees mean <strong>the</strong>y were implemented for specific purposes. The number of special guaranteetypes was 24, which included “Trade financing guarantee for exporting companies,’’ “<strong>Guarantee</strong>for bill discounts,’’ “<strong>Guarantee</strong> for real estate trusts <strong>to</strong> boost housing construction,’’ etc. All of<strong>the</strong>se special guarantees, except for P-CBO / CLO guarantees were terminated in March 2002when <strong>the</strong> economy picked up. The <strong>to</strong>tal number of special guarantee cases was 331,000 <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>amount was KRW 45 trillion. The special guarantee of KODIT was praised <strong>to</strong> have contributed<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> swift recovery of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Korea</strong>n economy by normalizing <strong>the</strong> market, alleviatingunemployment <strong>and</strong> revitalizing <strong>the</strong> bond market. The arrangement between <strong>Korea</strong> <strong>and</strong> IMF wasterminated in 2000, 3 years earlier than planned.Table 7Business performance of special guarantees(Unit : billion KRW)106


<strong>Korea</strong> <strong>Credit</strong> <strong>Guarantee</strong> <strong>Fund</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Its</strong> <strong>Contribution</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Korea</strong>n <strong>Economy</strong>pp. 97-1261. Special guarantee for start-up companiesThe financial crisis caused <strong>the</strong> unemployment level <strong>to</strong> soar up at an unprecedented level.The unemployment ratio which was 2.6% in 1997 rose <strong>to</strong> 8.0% in February 1999. In order <strong>to</strong>protect <strong>the</strong> middle-class <strong>and</strong> <strong>to</strong> create more jobs, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Korea</strong>n government <strong>and</strong> KODITintroduced special guarantee for start-up companies in July 1999. The program garneredtremendous interest nationwide. In 4 days after <strong>the</strong> program was announced, over 6,800 soleproprie<strong>to</strong>rs applied for a guarantee. Until its termination in June 2002, around KRW 5.5 trillionguarantees were provided <strong>to</strong> a <strong>to</strong>tal of 225,339 cases <strong>and</strong> contributed greatly in lowering <strong>the</strong>unemployment rate.Table 8Business performance of special guarantee for start-up companies(Unit : billion KRW)2. P-CBO guaranteeThe <strong>Korea</strong>n economy which was on a recovery process faced ano<strong>the</strong>r challenge in 2000. Abulk of corporate bonds issued during <strong>the</strong> financial crisis reached maturity, which made <strong>the</strong>bond market unstable. KODIT quickly implemented P-CBO guarantee <strong>and</strong> helped <strong>to</strong> stabilize<strong>the</strong> ailing bond market.Table 9Business performance of P-CBO guarantee(Unit : billion KRW)During <strong>the</strong> economic recovery process, much progress has been made in <strong>the</strong> creditguarantee system as well. The two most noticeable changes were <strong>the</strong> introduction of partialguarantee <strong>and</strong> launching of <strong>the</strong> credit rating system. Partial guarantee system refers <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>107


scheme under which <strong>the</strong> financial institution <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> KODIT share <strong>the</strong> loss at a pre-arrangedratio. The system, which was introduced in December 1998, aimed <strong>to</strong> prevent moral hazard <strong>and</strong><strong>the</strong> credit evaluation skills of financial institutions, <strong>the</strong>reby enhancing <strong>the</strong> soundness of creditguarantees. In December 2000, KODIT developed its in-house credit rating system calledCCRS 7 <strong>and</strong> applied it <strong>to</strong> its services. The launching of CCRS enabled a risk-based operation 8 ,which enhanced both efficiency in services <strong>and</strong> soundness of credit guarantees. During <strong>the</strong>recovery process, <strong>the</strong> credit guarantee amount of KODIT has vastly increased. The outst<strong>and</strong>ingguarantee, which was KRW 11 trillion in 1997, reached KRW 33 trillion in 2002. The drasticincrease of credit guarantee brought concerns about <strong>the</strong> negative impact of <strong>the</strong> system. To copewith this, KODIT started <strong>to</strong> implement innovative measures <strong>to</strong> reform its system. Theinnovation efforts of KODIT will be introduced later in this article.Table 10Business performance after <strong>the</strong> financial crisis(Unit : billion KRW)IV. Capital fund <strong>and</strong> governanceA. Capital fundCapital fund refers <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> financial resources with which KODIT can provide credit7 CCRS st<strong>and</strong>s for Corporate <strong>Credit</strong> Rating System <strong>and</strong> calculates <strong>the</strong> credit rating of <strong>the</strong> company by combining financialrating, non-financial quantitative <strong>and</strong> qualitative rating.8 This includes <strong>the</strong> introduction of a risk-based guarantee fee <strong>and</strong> entity-wide risk management system.108


<strong>Korea</strong> <strong>Credit</strong> <strong>Guarantee</strong> <strong>Fund</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Its</strong> <strong>Contribution</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Korea</strong>n <strong>Economy</strong>pp. 97-126guarantee. It decides KODIT’s ability <strong>to</strong> provide guarantee <strong>and</strong> adds credibility <strong>to</strong> its creditguarantee. The capital fund of KODIT as of <strong>the</strong> end of 2005 is around KRW 3 trillion. Capitalfund is composed of contribution from <strong>the</strong> <strong>Korea</strong>n government <strong>and</strong> financial institutions. Inparticular in 2005, KODIT received contribution of KRW 2 billion from SK Telecom, <strong>the</strong>leading telecommunication company in <strong>Korea</strong>, as a result of its effort <strong>to</strong> diversify its source offunding. The most important aspect of <strong>the</strong> capital fund is that it decides <strong>the</strong> <strong>to</strong>tal guaranteeprovision through <strong>the</strong> leverage effect. The leverage ratio prescribed in <strong>the</strong> law is 20 times <strong>the</strong>capital fund, but <strong>to</strong> assure <strong>the</strong> sound management of <strong>the</strong> fund, <strong>the</strong> ratio is kept around 10 times<strong>the</strong> fund.Table 11<strong>Contribution</strong> <strong>and</strong> capital fund(Unit : billion KRW)B. GovernanceKODIT has a decision making system, which is divided in<strong>to</strong> a body for outsidestakeholders <strong>and</strong> for inside stakeholders whose rights <strong>and</strong> obligations are prescribed by relevantregulations. Such arrangement aims <strong>to</strong> increase efficiency <strong>and</strong> <strong>to</strong> ensure fairness in <strong>the</strong> decisionmaking process.- Decision making system of outsidersThe board of policy is <strong>the</strong> highest decision making body. It sets <strong>the</strong> policy direction of <strong>and</strong>decides on important matters regarding <strong>the</strong> operation of KODIT. Through <strong>the</strong> board of policy,<strong>the</strong> Ministry of Finance <strong>and</strong> <strong>Economy</strong> (MOFE) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> National Assembly grant approval on109


<strong>the</strong> yearly business plan <strong>and</strong> budgeting.- Decision making system of insidersThe board of executive direc<strong>to</strong>rs sets yearly business plan of KODIT <strong>and</strong> approves internalregulations. It delegates its decision making power <strong>to</strong> relevant department heads <strong>to</strong> ensureau<strong>to</strong>nomy <strong>and</strong> increase efficiency.- Supervision <strong>and</strong> external evaluationKODIT receives supervision <strong>and</strong> external evaluation of its overall businesses. Every year,it receives <strong>the</strong> inspection from National Assembly. At <strong>the</strong> same time, KODIT’s accounting <strong>and</strong>performance is under <strong>the</strong> inspection from <strong>the</strong> Board of Audit <strong>and</strong> Inspection of <strong>Korea</strong> (BAI). Inaddition, <strong>the</strong> operation results of <strong>the</strong> fund <strong>and</strong> business performance of KODIT is evaluatedeach year by a board of fund operation evaluation, commissioned by <strong>the</strong> Ministry of Planning<strong>and</strong> Budget (MPB).National AssemblyFigure 1Governance of KODITV. Operation <strong>and</strong> performance of KODITUnder <strong>the</strong> <strong>Korea</strong> <strong>Credit</strong> <strong>Guarantee</strong> <strong>Fund</strong> Act Article 23, KODIT is engaged in a variety ofbusinesses including credit guarantee, business consulting, management of credit investigation,<strong>and</strong> management of credit information, etc.110


<strong>Korea</strong> <strong>Credit</strong> <strong>Guarantee</strong> <strong>Fund</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Its</strong> <strong>Contribution</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Korea</strong>n <strong>Economy</strong>pp. 97-126The <strong>Korea</strong> <strong>Credit</strong> <strong>Guarantee</strong> <strong>Fund</strong> Act Article 23 (Business)In order <strong>to</strong> achieve <strong>the</strong> purpose of this Act, <strong>Korea</strong> <strong>Credit</strong> <strong>Guarantee</strong> <strong>Fund</strong> shallcarry on <strong>the</strong> business falling under <strong>the</strong> following subparagraphs :1. Management of capital funds;2. <strong>Credit</strong> guarantees;3. Business consulting;3-2. Management of credit information;4. Management of subrogation right;5. Research <strong>and</strong> development of credit guarantee system; <strong>and</strong>6. Any business incidental <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> business as provided in subparagraphs 1 through5 <strong>and</strong> approved by <strong>the</strong> Minister of Finance <strong>and</strong> <strong>Economy</strong> 9A. <strong>Credit</strong> guarantee1. Framework of credit guarantee system<strong>Credit</strong> guarantee is one of <strong>the</strong> most important services of KODIT. The framework ofguarantee for bank loans, which takes up around 85% of <strong>the</strong> general guarantee, is as follows.First, an applicant applies for a guarantee <strong>to</strong> KODIT typically after a consultation for a loanwith a bank. Then, KODIT issues a letter of credit guarantee after a series of approvalprocedures. Upon receiving <strong>the</strong> letter of credit guarantee, <strong>the</strong> bank extends loan <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> applicant.Figure 2Framework of guarantee for bank loan9 Under this subparagraph, KODIT operates guarantee combined guarantee services <strong>and</strong> credit insurance services.111


2. <strong>Credit</strong> guarantee procedureThere are two methods in credit guarantee procedure, which are direct <strong>and</strong> indirect method.The direct method is <strong>the</strong> most common type in which KODIT conducts credit investigations <strong>and</strong>credit evaluation on applicants <strong>and</strong> decides whe<strong>the</strong>r or not it extends guarantee for <strong>the</strong>applicants. In 2005, 97% of all credit guarantees were provided through this method. Whereasunder <strong>the</strong> indirect method, KODOT entrusts banks with all <strong>the</strong> operations for credit guaranteesincluding credit investigation <strong>and</strong> issuance of <strong>the</strong> letter of credit guarantees. Currently, twotypes of indirect guarantee, general indirect guarantee <strong>and</strong> special indirect guarantee, are inoperation. Through trustee contracts with KODIT, 13 banks are participating in <strong>the</strong> generalindirect guarantee program under which <strong>the</strong> participating banks have <strong>the</strong> discretion <strong>to</strong> providecredit guarantee up <strong>to</strong> KRW 100 million. The special indirect guarantee program is open onlyfor <strong>the</strong> Industrial Bank of <strong>Korea</strong> (IBK) which allows IBK <strong>to</strong> extend guarantees <strong>to</strong> cooperatives.Figure 3 Classification of credit guarantee services 1010 Refer <strong>to</strong> Table 13.112


<strong>Korea</strong> <strong>Credit</strong> <strong>Guarantee</strong> <strong>Fund</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Its</strong> <strong>Contribution</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Korea</strong>n <strong>Economy</strong>pp. 97-126Table 12Outst<strong>and</strong>ing general guarantee by methods(Unit : billion KRW)General guarantees consist of 11 types of guarantee. Each type of guarantee <strong>and</strong> itsoutst<strong>and</strong>ing amount is described in table 4 <strong>and</strong> table 13.Table 13Types of general guarantees(Unit : billion KRW)11 Reguarantee service was terminated in Jan. 2004.113


Table 14Outst<strong>and</strong>ing general guarantee by type(Unit : billion KRW)3. Eligible enterprisesAll profit-seeking business entities or <strong>the</strong>ir organizations are eligible for credit guaranteeunless <strong>the</strong>y fall under <strong>the</strong> categories as follows. Ineligible industries include (a) hotel,recreational condominium business, (b) luxurious restaurant business, (c) financial services, (d)real estate agency service. Ineligible companies include (a) company that is not in operation, (b)company that is overdue in payments of bank loans, (c) company that submits false documents,(d) company run by a person responsible for <strong>the</strong> payment under guarantee, etc.4. Flow of credit guarantee serviceIn order <strong>to</strong> obtain guarantee from KODIT, <strong>the</strong> applicant needs <strong>to</strong> go through a series ofprocedures. First, <strong>the</strong> applicant is required <strong>to</strong> have a consultation visit or internet consultation.114


<strong>Korea</strong> <strong>Credit</strong> <strong>Guarantee</strong> <strong>Fund</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Its</strong> <strong>Contribution</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Korea</strong>n <strong>Economy</strong>pp. 97-126In this stage, KODIT focuses on <strong>the</strong> applicant’s eligibility. After receiving required documents,KODIT conducts a credit investigation <strong>and</strong> reports <strong>the</strong> credit rating of <strong>the</strong> applicant. During <strong>the</strong>credit evaluation stage, KODIT decides <strong>the</strong> amount of guarantee for <strong>the</strong> applicant. If KODITdecides <strong>to</strong> provide a guarantee, it issues a letter of credit guarantee <strong>to</strong> a lending bank. It usuallytakes three <strong>to</strong> nine working days for <strong>the</strong> whole process.5. Structure of guarantee feeAn applying enterprise is required <strong>to</strong> pay guarantee fee <strong>to</strong> KODIT upon receiving <strong>the</strong> letterof credit guarantee. KODIT has a guarantee fee system which is closely tied <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> credit ratingof <strong>the</strong> applicant. The basic fee rate ranging from 0.5% <strong>to</strong> 2.0% p.a. of <strong>the</strong> guarantee amount iscomputed by <strong>the</strong> corresponding rating of <strong>the</strong> applicant. The final fee rate is decided by addingor subtracting a certain rate <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> basic fee, depending on <strong>the</strong> applicant’s current situation or<strong>the</strong> type of guarantee product. For a large company, additional 0.5% p.a. is added <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> final feerate.Table 15Basic guarantee fee rate115


Table 16<strong>Guarantee</strong> fee system6. Coverage ratioAs discussed in <strong>the</strong> previous chapter, KODIT introduced a partial guarantee system in1998. KODIT revised its partial guarantee system in January 2006, under which <strong>the</strong> coverageratio for an applicant is tied <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> credit rating. One noticeable feature is that when <strong>the</strong> creditrating goes up, <strong>the</strong> coverage ratio diminishes. This is because KODIT’s new partial coveragesystem aims <strong>to</strong> encourage <strong>the</strong> credit lending of private financial institutions by sending <strong>the</strong>m <strong>the</strong>signal that an enterprise with lower coverage ratio has a higher rating.Table 17St<strong>and</strong>ard coverage ratio by credit rating* If an enterprise is not able <strong>to</strong> accept <strong>the</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ard coverage ratio, it is required <strong>to</strong> pay additionalguarantee fee of 0.2% p p.a. per 5% p of coverage ratio116


<strong>Korea</strong> <strong>Credit</strong> <strong>Guarantee</strong> <strong>Fund</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Its</strong> <strong>Contribution</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Korea</strong>n <strong>Economy</strong>pp. 97-126B. Management of credit informationThe importance of <strong>Credit</strong> information cannot be emphasized <strong>to</strong>o much, especially in <strong>the</strong>modern economy. KODIT, since its foundation, has accumulated <strong>and</strong> managed its creditinformation data collected in <strong>the</strong> process of credit investigation. It successfully launched <strong>the</strong>credit information service called CRETOP in 1992 using its largest database of creditinformation on <strong>Korea</strong>n SMEs. With this service, enterprises <strong>and</strong> financial institutions couldobtain crucial credit information on <strong>the</strong>ir trading partners <strong>and</strong> clients. KODIT had acted as acredit bureau until <strong>Korea</strong> Enterprise Data (KED) was spun off in May 2005, it. In 2005, KODITconducted 47,311 cases of credit investigations <strong>and</strong> possesses 741 thous<strong>and</strong> credit informationon <strong>Korea</strong>n SMEs as of <strong>the</strong> end of 2005.C. <strong>Guarantee</strong> combined investmentIn March 2005, KODIT launched guarantee combined investment service through which itprovides venture companies with capital by purchasing shares or underwriting bonds. Thisservice serves both parties interest because invested companies can obtain long-term capitalwhile KODIT can expect extra capital gains from <strong>the</strong> investment. Eligible enterprises for thisservice are innovative companies in digital broadcasting, next-generation battery,semiconduc<strong>to</strong>r industries that have great potential <strong>to</strong> lead <strong>the</strong> <strong>Korea</strong>n economy <strong>to</strong> a higher stage.As of <strong>the</strong> end of June 2006, KODIT invested KRW 8.5 billion in 10 companies.D. <strong>Credit</strong> insuranceKODIT introduced credit insurance service exclusively for SMEs in March 2004. Thisservice is designed <strong>to</strong> provide SMEs with protection against <strong>the</strong> risk which comes from <strong>the</strong>failure of buyers <strong>to</strong> pay <strong>the</strong>ir trade receivable. It covers 80% of <strong>the</strong> non-payment of receivablesin case <strong>the</strong> buyer cannot fulfill its obligations <strong>to</strong>ward <strong>the</strong> supplier (insurant) due <strong>to</strong> insolvencyor default. The maximum amount for each insurant is KRW 1 billion while <strong>the</strong> <strong>to</strong>tal amount oftrade receivables from a single buyer should not exceed KRW 7 billion. The credit insuranceservice also helps SMEs (insurants) enhance <strong>the</strong>ir risk management ability with KODITconstant moni<strong>to</strong>ring of credit status of suppliers. The service has been popular among SMEssince its inception. In 2004, <strong>the</strong> initial year of service, KODIT provided KRW 1.3 billion <strong>and</strong>KRW 1.7 billion of credit insurance in 2005.117


Figure 4Framework of credit insuranceTable 18Business performance of credit insurance(Unit : billion KRW)E. Infrastructure credit guaranteeIn January 1999, KODIT became <strong>the</strong> sole opera<strong>to</strong>r of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Korea</strong> Infrastructure <strong>Credit</strong><strong>Guarantee</strong> <strong>Fund</strong> (KICGF), which was established in August 1994 <strong>and</strong> used <strong>to</strong> be operated by <strong>the</strong><strong>Korea</strong> Development Bank, KOTEC, <strong>and</strong> KODIT. The objective of Infrastructure creditguarantee is <strong>to</strong> help private investment corporations obtain funds for infrastructure constructionprojects. In order <strong>to</strong> obtain infrastructure credit guarantee, <strong>the</strong> applicant is required <strong>to</strong> apply for<strong>the</strong> guarantee <strong>and</strong> go through screening <strong>and</strong> investigation process. KODIT decides whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>to</strong>accept <strong>the</strong> application <strong>and</strong> draws up <strong>the</strong> possible amount of <strong>the</strong> credit guarantee. Reflectinglarge scales <strong>and</strong> low risks, <strong>the</strong> ceiling amount of this service for a single firm is KRW 100billion <strong>and</strong> guarantee fee ranges from 0.3% <strong>to</strong> 1.3% of <strong>the</strong> <strong>to</strong>tal guarantee amount. Theguarantee fee is calculated based on <strong>the</strong> project risk <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> credit rating of <strong>the</strong> applicant.Outst<strong>and</strong>ing infrastructure guarantee s<strong>to</strong>od at 233 billion KRW for 11 projects in 2004 <strong>and</strong> 321billion KRW for 10 projects 2005.118


<strong>Korea</strong> <strong>Credit</strong> <strong>Guarantee</strong> <strong>Fund</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Its</strong> <strong>Contribution</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Korea</strong>n <strong>Economy</strong>pp. 97-126Table 18Outst<strong>and</strong>ing infrastructure credit guaranteeF. Management consultingTo help SMEs address <strong>the</strong> difficulties <strong>the</strong>y face in management, KODIT providesmanagement consulting service. The service is composed of management consulting, trainingprograms, <strong>and</strong> publications. Management consulting is performed by “KODIT ManagementConsulting Group,’’ formed of independent experts who possess experience <strong>and</strong> knowledge in<strong>the</strong>ir fields. KODIT pays 50-70% of <strong>the</strong> consulting fees. Consulting is done on site or via <strong>the</strong>Internet. In 2005, 22 cases were provided in <strong>the</strong> form of on-site consulting while 56 cases weredone over <strong>the</strong> Internet. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, KODIT trains owners <strong>and</strong> employees of SMEs through itsvarious programs, which are also provided on line as well as off line. KODIT offers nineprograms including Integrated Course for Accounting, Course for Professional Salesmen, <strong>and</strong>Course for Accounts Receivable Management. In 2005, a <strong>to</strong>tal of 4,164 trainees passed through<strong>the</strong>se training programs. In addition, KODIT publishes <strong>the</strong> monthly “KODIT newsletter’’leaflets <strong>and</strong> “Management Information’’ booklets which contain useful information in <strong>the</strong> areasof business strategy, personnel, finance, <strong>and</strong> marketing. 18,318 publications in <strong>to</strong>tal weredistributed in 2005.Table 19Business performance of management consulting119


VI. Measurement of KODIT’s operation resultsKODIT has played an important role in <strong>the</strong> development of <strong>Korea</strong>n economy that has beenrarely witnessed in <strong>the</strong> world’s his<strong>to</strong>ry. There have been attempts <strong>to</strong> estimate <strong>the</strong> benefits ofcredit guarantee, most notably by two leading research institutions, <strong>Korea</strong> Institute forIndustrial Economics <strong>and</strong> Technology (KIET) <strong>and</strong> <strong>Korea</strong> Institute of Public Finance (KIPF).A. Input-output analysis (KIPF, 2003)The benefits of KODIT can be calculated through <strong>the</strong> Input-output model 12 . The estimatesare shown in <strong>the</strong> table below.Table 20 Benefits of credit guarantee 13 (Unit : billion KRW)According <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> analysis, in 2005 <strong>the</strong> production induced by credit guarantee reachedKRW 1.3 trillion. For 2005 <strong>the</strong> ratio of “production inducement’’ <strong>to</strong> “guarantee provision’’ worked12 This model is based on Input-Output model of W. Leontief, 1906-1999.13 The results for year 2003 <strong>to</strong> 2005 were calculated by KODIT using <strong>the</strong> methodology of KIPF.120


<strong>Korea</strong> <strong>Credit</strong> <strong>Guarantee</strong> <strong>Fund</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Its</strong> <strong>Contribution</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Korea</strong>n <strong>Economy</strong>pp. 97-126out <strong>to</strong> be 4.39%. That is <strong>to</strong> say, for every KRW 100 guarantee provision additional KRW 4.39 ofproduction was induced. Thus this result presents policy makers a meaningful point in thatcredit guarantee institutions should focus on <strong>the</strong> industrial sec<strong>to</strong>rs that have larger productioninducement effects. In 2005, KRW 600 billion additional value was created by credit guarantee.<strong>Credit</strong> guarantee also was estimated <strong>to</strong> induce over 30,000 jobs every year. The ratio of jobcreation effect <strong>to</strong> guarantee provision was around 4%, reflecting <strong>the</strong> amount of unemploymentrestrained by credit guarantee.B. Cost <strong>and</strong> benefit analysis (KIET, 2001)Cost <strong>and</strong> benefit analysis measures efficiency <strong>and</strong> value of public institutions or projects bycomparing <strong>the</strong> costs <strong>and</strong> benefits from operations. First, <strong>the</strong> cost of KODIT is calculated asfollows :Costs of KODIT (payments under guarantee labor costs currentexpenses commissions) (recoveries from payment guarantee feesincome from investment)rate of return)(contributions from <strong>the</strong> government x expectedSecond, <strong>the</strong> benefits of KODIT were estimated under <strong>the</strong> assumption that <strong>the</strong> benefits ofcredit guarantee are <strong>the</strong> sum of added value from additional guarantee provision. The formulasare presented below.Benefits of KODIT <strong>Guarantee</strong> provision VOIC 14VOICAdded Value (t) / Managerial Assets (t-1)(Sales (t-1) / Managerial Assets (t-1))(Sales (t) / Sales (t-1))(Added Value (t) / Sales (t))Managerial Assets Total Asset Construction in Process—InvestmentThe estimates for <strong>the</strong> benefits <strong>and</strong> costs are presented in <strong>the</strong> following table :14 Value Added <strong>to</strong> Operating Investment Capital.121


Table 21 Estimates of costs <strong>and</strong> benefits of KODIT 15(Unit : billion KRW)The above table shows that <strong>the</strong> benefits of KODIT exceed <strong>the</strong> costs. The Benefit <strong>to</strong> Cost(B/C) ratio 16 which shows <strong>the</strong> efficiency of a public institution has ranged from 5.2 <strong>to</strong> 7.3 times,which implies <strong>the</strong> operation of KODIT has been efficient.VII. Recent innovation effort <strong>and</strong> future development strategyKODIT has made great contribution <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> development of SMEs as well as overcomingnational challenges such as <strong>the</strong> oil shock <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> financial crisis. Never<strong>the</strong>less, it was pointedout that <strong>the</strong> overblown amount of credit guarantee since <strong>the</strong> financial crisis hindered <strong>the</strong>working of <strong>the</strong> financial market based on market principle, prolonged <strong>the</strong> life span of marginalSMEs <strong>and</strong> placed a heavy burden on <strong>the</strong> national economy due <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> high cost in operating <strong>the</strong>guarantee scheme. In response <strong>to</strong> this, KODIT derived a new corporate vision HOPE-KODITwhich aims at operational, organizational, personnel innovation with an ultimate goal of pursingself-sustainability. Each character of HOPE st<strong>and</strong>s for healthy capital structure, optimal SMEsupport, professional workforce <strong>and</strong> ethical operation. HOPE symbolizes <strong>the</strong> strong will ofKODIT <strong>to</strong> achieve systematic innovation with a market friendly approach. To achieve thisvision, KODIT set up three objectives; (a) reducing default rate <strong>to</strong> 4% until 2008, (b)eliminating high cost low efficiency fac<strong>to</strong>rs, (c) balancing public interest <strong>and</strong> commercialism,contrary <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> previous approach which solely focused on public interest.15 The results for year 2003 <strong>to</strong> 2005 were calculated by KODIT using <strong>the</strong> methodology of KIET.16 A public project is said <strong>to</strong> be efficient when <strong>the</strong> ratio is equal <strong>to</strong> or above 1.122


<strong>Korea</strong> <strong>Credit</strong> <strong>Guarantee</strong> <strong>Fund</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Its</strong> <strong>Contribution</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Korea</strong>n <strong>Economy</strong>pp. 97-126⋅Figure 8Vision of KODITA. Operational innovationThe aim of operational innovation is <strong>to</strong> reinforce <strong>the</strong> market principle in <strong>the</strong> creditguarantee system, <strong>to</strong> build up a risk-based operating system, <strong>and</strong> ultimately achieve financialself-sustainability. To this aim, KODIT plans <strong>to</strong> reduce outst<strong>and</strong>ing guarantee by KRW 1 trillionannually <strong>to</strong> reach KRW 25 trillion in 2010. Second, it will gradually replace long-term or largesumguarantee with guarantee for innovative or growing enterprises. Third, it will reduceoverall default rate by inducing a long-term installment payment product <strong>and</strong> implementinginnovative guarantee investigation, etc. KODIT will also reasonably divide <strong>the</strong> burden ofguarantee market participants, through differentiated guarantee coverage ratio <strong>and</strong> guarantee feerange, <strong>and</strong> through increasing <strong>the</strong> contribution rate of financial institutions. As for riskmanagement, KODIT is going <strong>to</strong> build up an integrated risk management system by 2008,which will enable forecasting <strong>and</strong> controlling of operational risk fac<strong>to</strong>r <strong>and</strong> eventually enhance<strong>the</strong> financial health. In performance management, KODIT introduced a balanced scorecardsystem <strong>and</strong> concluded performance contracts with senior managers <strong>to</strong> ensure responsibility inmanagement.B. Organizational innovationTo efficiently achieve <strong>the</strong> corporate objectives, <strong>the</strong> organization of head office has been cutdown, while <strong>the</strong> functions of business headquarters have been streng<strong>the</strong>ned. The head officewas reorganized based on its function from its former workload-oriented organization. While123


<strong>the</strong> number of department was reduced <strong>to</strong> 22 from 25, new strategic departments wereestablished, which are Innovation Strategy Office, Performance Evaluation Department,Business Development Office, <strong>and</strong> Industry Research Department. Branch offices wereregrouped under <strong>the</strong> business headquarter system <strong>to</strong> boost <strong>the</strong> local-based business, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>senior direc<strong>to</strong>rs of business headquarters were entrusted with <strong>the</strong> right of personnelmanagement. In addition, Hi-plus Teams were installed for a more efficient risk management.Hi-plus teams, which are responsible for <strong>the</strong> guarantees surpassing KRW 1 billion, specialize inlarge-sum guarantee.C. Personnel innovationPersonnel system focuses both on ability-oriented management <strong>and</strong> performance-orientedcompensation, which differs from a former seniority system. Organization will be groupedaccording <strong>to</strong> positions <strong>and</strong> duties, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> difference in remuneration according <strong>to</strong> employee’sperformance will be widened. Appraisals based on seniority system will be cut down, <strong>and</strong> eachemployee will be given rotational duties according <strong>to</strong> his ability <strong>and</strong> performance.VIII. ConclusionKODIT has experienced <strong>the</strong> ups <strong>and</strong> downs of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Korea</strong>n economy since its establishmentin 1976. It provided credit guarantees for market stabilization at every economic crisis <strong>and</strong>served as a driving force of <strong>the</strong> economic growth of <strong>Korea</strong>. The major contributions of KODITcan be summarized as follows. First, KODIT supported SMEs financing by guaranteeing <strong>the</strong>ircredit. <strong>Credit</strong> guarantee alleviates <strong>the</strong> discrimination between SMEs <strong>and</strong> large enterprises in <strong>the</strong>financial market <strong>and</strong> enhances efficiency in <strong>the</strong> allocation of financial resources. Also bysupporting SMEs, <strong>the</strong> driving force of <strong>the</strong> future economy, it promotes economic vitality.Second, KODIT contributed <strong>to</strong> building up a credit-based society. Through its unique approvalprocess focusing on intangible resources of SMEs ra<strong>the</strong>r than its collateral, KODIT hasfacilitated credit-based commercial transaction <strong>and</strong> enhanced credit management ability ofenterprises. Third, KODIT contributed <strong>to</strong> balanced growth of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Korea</strong>n economy. Bysupporting <strong>the</strong> financing of SMEs that lag behind large enterprises, it eases <strong>the</strong> inequalitybetween SMEs <strong>and</strong> large enterprises.The successful operation of KODIT of <strong>the</strong> last 30 years has become a benchmarking targe<strong>to</strong>f countries around <strong>the</strong> world. During <strong>the</strong> first half year of 2006, KODIT introduced its credit124


<strong>Korea</strong> <strong>Credit</strong> <strong>Guarantee</strong> <strong>Fund</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Its</strong> <strong>Contribution</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Korea</strong>n <strong>Economy</strong>pp. 97-126guarantee services <strong>to</strong> individuals <strong>and</strong> governmental entities of 13 countries, including <strong>the</strong>European Mutual <strong>Guarantee</strong> Association, Office of Small <strong>and</strong> Medium Enterprises Promotion ofThail<strong>and</strong>, Association of Small <strong>and</strong> Medium Businesses of Vietnam, etc. Through continuousinnovation efforts, KODIT aims <strong>to</strong> contribute <strong>to</strong> <strong>Korea</strong>n economic growth as ever. And at <strong>the</strong>same time, KODIT will continue <strong>to</strong> support countries in need of a credit guarantee systemthrough fur<strong>the</strong>r international exchange <strong>and</strong> cooperation.ReferencesGreen, Anke, 2003. <strong>Credit</strong> <strong>Guarantee</strong> Scheme for Small Enterprises : An Effective Instrument <strong>to</strong>Promote Private-Sec<strong>to</strong>r-Led Growth? United Nations Industrial Development Organization,SME Technical Working Paper Series No. 10.Kim, Sung Jin (ed.), 2006. The Small <strong>and</strong> Medium Enterprises of <strong>Korea</strong>, Seoul : MaekyungPublishing.KODIT, 1998. <strong>Credit</strong> <strong>Guarantee</strong> Programs of <strong>the</strong> World.KODIT, 2006. <strong>Credit</strong> <strong>Guarantee</strong> Programs of <strong>the</strong> World.KODIT, 1996. The 25 Year His<strong>to</strong>ry of <strong>Korea</strong> <strong>Credit</strong> <strong>Guarantee</strong> <strong>Fund</strong> 1976-1996.KODIT, 2005. Annual Report 2004.KODIT, 2005. Analysis on <strong>the</strong> <strong>Contribution</strong>s of KODIT <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> National <strong>Economy</strong>.KODIT, 2006. Annual Report 2005.KODIT, 2006. Annual Statistics of KODIT.KODIT, 2006. Changes <strong>and</strong> Innovations of KODIT.KODIT, 2006. Guide <strong>to</strong> Operations of KODIT.KODIT, 2006. Report on <strong>the</strong> Performance of KODIT.KODIT, 2006. The 30 Year His<strong>to</strong>ry of KODIT 1976-2006.<strong>Korea</strong> Federation of Small <strong>and</strong> Medium Business, 2006. Statistics on SME.KIET, (<strong>Korea</strong> Institute for Industrial Economics <strong>and</strong> Technology), 2001. Benefits of <strong>Credit</strong><strong>Guarantee</strong> <strong>and</strong> Direction for Future Development of <strong>Korea</strong> <strong>Credit</strong> <strong>Guarantee</strong> <strong>Fund</strong>.KIPF, (<strong>Korea</strong> Institute of Public Finance), 2003. Performance of <strong>Credit</strong> <strong>Guarantee</strong> System <strong>and</strong>125


Optimal Governmental <strong>Contribution</strong> for <strong>the</strong> System.<strong>Korea</strong> National Statistical Office, 2005. Basic Business Statistics Almanac.Vogel, Robert <strong>and</strong> Adams, Dale, 1997. Costs & Benefits of Loan <strong>Guarantee</strong> Programs, TheFinancier, 4(1&2).126

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!