27.08.2015 Views

Plant&Equipment

Download pdf - OPERC

Download pdf - OPERC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

special report<br />

Lifting<br />

the veil<br />

on Dust<br />

Dust is THE topic for health, safety<br />

and welfare practitioners at present<br />

and there is currently a flurry of activity<br />

within trade and professional bodies<br />

to produce appropriate guidance<br />

documents. Perhaps one of the most<br />

useful resources to be found is the lively<br />

on-line discussion forum established<br />

by the Health and Safety Executive<br />

(details below). Various contributions<br />

have been made to date as part of a<br />

constructive debate and the discussions<br />

are extremely useful and enlightening.<br />

One line of discussion has focused upon<br />

what can be done to reduce the risk<br />

posed by dust and many have suggested<br />

that the risk should be designed<br />

out completely at project inception.<br />

Essentially, the theory is that if the need<br />

for electric or mechanical power tools is<br />

designed out, then the risk is eliminated<br />

at source. This philosophy also<br />

conveniently fits into the construction<br />

and highway industries’ push for<br />

standardisation of building components,<br />

off site manufacture and buildability,<br />

leading ultimately to cost reductions and<br />

productivity improvements. The question<br />

is, does such a philosophy work in real<br />

life? The answer is simply NO.<br />

If the construction industry produced factory controlled<br />

utilitarian concrete boxes in place of dynamic construction<br />

projects, and there was no existing housing stock or<br />

infrastructure to maintain, then designing out the risk could<br />

work. In reality, it will only work for those new projects that<br />

can manufacture components and simply assemble them<br />

on site. For all other construction and highways projects<br />

a more holistic approach is needed. Although this should<br />

include consideration of designing out the risk, thought<br />

must also be given to dust suppression, dust extraction,<br />

the safe use of PPE, operator training, innovative tool<br />

design and so forth. Of course it would be idyllic if design<br />

could be the solution to the dust problem, but this would<br />

require an industry that does not have to renovate old<br />

buildings, demolish existing structures, repair<br />

underground services or maintain existing<br />

structures. As long as industry has to deal with<br />

muck and bullets, dust will remain a problem<br />

and therefore industry needs resources,<br />

facilities and innovations to reduce the risk<br />

posed. The key has to be education and what<br />

is good about the HSE forum is that it has very<br />

successfully engendered the debate so that<br />

solutions are already in the making<br />

To add your voice to this debate, visit the:<br />

Project for Reducing Respiratory Disease<br />

in Kerb, Paving and Block Cutting<br />

URL: http://webcommunities.hse.gov.uk/<br />

inovem/inovem.ti/kerbcutting.community<br />

February 2008<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!