OIL Louisiana Mississippi Alabama Texas 1000 ft 1500 ft 5000 ft 7500 ft GAS Louisiana Mississippi Alabama Texas 1000 ft 1500 ft 5000 ft 7500 ft 50 0 50 mi 50 0 50 km Existing <strong>Deepwater</strong> Pipelines New Proposed Figure 23. <strong>Deepwater</strong> oil and gas pipelines in the <strong>Gulf</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mexico</strong>. 36
LEASING Until the mid-1990's, leasing activities in the <strong>Gulf</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mexico</strong> were focused on shallow-water blocks located on the continental shelf (water depths <strong>of</strong> approximately 650 ft [200 m] or less). For example, in 1992 there were 176 leases issued in water depths less than approximately 650 ft (200 m), compared with only 28 leases issued in water depths greater than that depth. In 1995, the DWRRA established incentives for royalty relief based on water-depth intervals defined in meters. The water-depth categories depicted in figure 24 reflect the divisions used in the DWRRA. This figure shows the magnitude <strong>of</strong> the DWRRA impact, with tremendous deepwater leasing activity from 1996 through 1998 in water depths greater than 800 m (2,625 ft), where the greatest royalty relief was available. In 1992, for example, leases in water depths greater than 800 m (2,625 ft) only accounted for 3 percent <strong>of</strong> leases issued. By the end <strong>of</strong> 1998, however, this had grown to almost 70 percent. While interest in deepwater blocks increased during the mid-1990’s, interest in shallow-water blocks faded during that period. For example, shelf leases accounted for 86 percent <strong>of</strong> all leases issued in 1992, but this dropped to 23 percent by the end <strong>of</strong> 1998. BIDDING AND LEASING TRENDS The <strong>Gulf</strong> experienced a lull in leasing activities in 1999 — about a four-fold decrease compared with the 1998 levels. However, interest is rekindling in blocks in the 200-m (650-ft) or less range and in the greater than 800-m (2,625-ft) range, evidenced by increased leasing activities in the 1999-2003 interval. Note that shelf leasing has once again outpaced leasing in water depths greater than 800 m (2,625 ft). Some <strong>of</strong> the resurgent interest in the shelf area may be the result <strong>of</strong> the MMS’s recent royalty suspension program for new deep-gas development in water depths less than 200 m (650 ft). Data in figure 24 include 95 leases awarded in Sale 181 (2001) and 14 leases in Sale 198 (2003), both Eastern GOM sales. All <strong>of</strong> the leases in these Eastern GOM sales are located in water depths <strong>of</strong> 1,600 m (5,250 ft) or greater. Figure 25a was derived from the data in figure 24 but displays the deepwater categories used elsewhere in this report (shallow-water data are excluded from figure 25a). These deepwater data show the rapid increase in leasing activity that began in 1995. Although GOM leasing activity plummeted in 1999, there has since been a steady increase in leases awarded in the 1,500-4,999 ft (457-1,524 m) and the 5,000-7,499 ft (1,524- 2,286 m) intervals since that time. Figure 25b shows the total amount <strong>of</strong> money spent annually for leases in each water-depth range. Large financial investments were made by the oil and gas industry from 1996 through 1998. Bid amounts were depressed in 1999, moderately increased to 2001, and slightly decreased since that time. Most important for lease trend analysis is the average bid amount per lease as depicted in figure 25c. Overall, the average bid price for all deepwater leases steadily increased from 1992 through 2001. Beginning in 2002, there was a downturn in average bid amount per deepwater block. The high average bid amounts for 2001 reflect the fact that the industry bid large amounts per block for leases in the Eastern GOM. This was the first opportunity in 16 years for companies to bid in an area immediately adjacent to discoveries in the Central GOM area. As the value <strong>of</strong> deepwater leases increased throughout the 1990’s, MMS rejected an increasing number <strong>of</strong> deepwater high bids that it viewed as insufficient. Figure 26 shows that tracts with rejected bids moved into increasingly deeper waters over time. The rejection trend reflects the fact that, as more deepwater fields began production, they provided analogs (with high production rates, thick reservoir sections, and production infrastructure) and thus reduced the risk on similar deepwater blocks, leading to an increase in the estimated net present worth <strong>of</strong> the unleased deepwater blocks. 37
- Page 2 and 3: ON COVER - The cover features four
- Page 5 and 6: Table of Contents Page PREFACE.....
- Page 7 and 8: Figures Page Figure 1. The Gulf of
- Page 9 and 10: Figures — continued Page Figure 5
- Page 11: Tables Page Table 1 List of Deepwat
- Page 15 and 16: INTRODUCTION The deepwater Gulf of
- Page 17 and 18: BACKGROUND DEFINITIONS The GOM Oute
- Page 19 and 20: EXPANDING FRONTIER When the origina
- Page 21 and 22: 1992 - 1993 Louisiana Mississippi A
- Page 23 and 24: 1992 - 2003 Texas Louisiana Mississ
- Page 25 and 26: fffffffffffffffff 1500 ft Quaternar
- Page 27 and 28: In addition to the traditional oil
- Page 29 and 30: 15 Figure 8. Gas hydrates on the se
- Page 31 and 32: 1998 - 1999 Louisiana Mississippi A
- Page 33 and 34: 4,500 4,000 Number of Active Leases
- Page 35 and 36: ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVITY The extensiv
- Page 37 and 38: Operators submit a remotely operate
- Page 39 and 40: 25 Figure 15. Loop and eddy current
- Page 41 and 42: 1975 - 1979 Louisiana Mississippi A
- Page 43 and 44: 29 Deepwater Discoveries $ #Y Texas
- Page 45 and 46: 31 Texas ð PORT ARANSAS 1000 ft 15
- Page 47 and 48: Louisiana Mississippi Alabama 33 Te
- Page 49: Pipelines New pipelines Proposed pi
- Page 53 and 54: Number of Leases Bid On 600 500 400
- Page 55 and 56: 1998 - 1999 Louisiana Mississippi A
- Page 57 and 58: 1992 - 1993 Louisiana Mississippi A
- Page 59 and 60: 2004 - 2005 (741 leases) Louisiana
- Page 61 and 62: DRILLING AND DEVELOPMENT Deepwater
- Page 63 and 64: 49 Figure 30. The Discoverer Deep S
- Page 65 and 66: 51 Number of Wells Spudded 250 200
- Page 67 and 68: 120 > 7,500 ft 107 108 100 5,000 -
- Page 69 and 70: 1998 - 1999 Louisiana Mississippi A
- Page 71 and 72: 1998 - 1999 Louisiana Mississippi A
- Page 73 and 74: 180 160 Deepwater EP Deepwater DOCD
- Page 75 and 76: 340 626 390 472 472 456 393 475 590
- Page 77 and 78: Year of First Production Table 4 De
- Page 79 and 80: Year of First Production Table 4 De
- Page 81 and 82: A predominant workhorse of the GOM
- Page 83 and 84: 3 Number Installed 2 1 0 2004 69 TL
- Page 85 and 86: Flow lines to host platform Subsea
- Page 87 and 88: 140 131 120 100 78 Number of Wells
- Page 89 and 90: RESERVES AND PRODUCTION The deepwat
- Page 91 and 92: 77 Million Barrels of Oil Equivalen
- Page 93 and 94: 18 16 14 12 10 8 Number of Fields 6
- Page 95 and 96: 81 Million Barrels of Oil Equivalen
- Page 97 and 98: 45,000 40,000 Million Barrels Oil E
- Page 99 and 100: 1992-1993 1994-1995 1996-1997 Lease
- Page 101 and 102:
S hallo w- wa ter GOM 11% Deepwater
- Page 103 and 104:
1,200,000 1,000,000 Total productio
- Page 105 and 106:
1,100,000 1,000,000 Subsea oil Tota
- Page 107 and 108:
900,000 800,000 Majors Nonmajors 70
- Page 109 and 110:
45,000 40,000 Max oil rate 1,000-1,
- Page 111 and 112:
4,000 3,500 Shallow water Deepwater
- Page 113 and 114:
Texas Auger Louisiana SS182 Troika
- Page 115 and 116:
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS This report
- Page 117 and 118:
2,500 Number of leases Average U.S.
- Page 119 and 120:
Number of Years 14 12 leas es in p
- Page 121 and 122:
data for this analysis include only
- Page 123 and 124:
80 2500 70 60 Number of leases dril
- Page 125 and 126:
4,500 4,000 3,500 Leases tested Lea
- Page 127:
• Nonmajor companies have made mo
- Page 131:
REFERENCES Bascle, B. J., L. D. Nix
- Page 134 and 135:
Project Name Area/Block Water Depth
- Page 136 and 137:
Project Name Area/Block Water Depth
- Page 138 and 139:
Project Name Area/Block Water Depth
- Page 140 and 141:
Project Name Area/Block Water Depth
- Page 142 and 143:
Project Name Area/Block Water Depth
- Page 144 and 145:
Project Name Area/Block Water Depth
- Page 146 and 147:
Sale Number Sale Location Sale Date
- Page 148 and 149:
Completed Studies [MMS Study Number
- Page 150 and 151:
Group Name Company Name MMS Number
- Page 152 and 153:
Group Name Company Name MMS Number
- Page 154 and 155:
Appendix G. Subsea Completions. Are
- Page 156 and 157:
Area Block API Number Operator Comp
- Page 158 and 159:
Area Block API Number Operator 144
- Page 160 and 161:
Area Block API Number Operator Comp
- Page 162 and 163:
Area Block API Number Operator Comp
- Page 164 and 165:
Year Shallowwater Oil (MBOPD) Deepw