Performance
provincial-review-physician-licensing
provincial-review-physician-licensing
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Role of organizations<br />
It is widely understood by all stakeholders we met with during this review, that those who own a public hospital (HAs and DF) have responsibility for granting<br />
physician privileges. However, there are two areas where the Ministry and the College are involved in programs that create exceptions to the current processes<br />
for privileging and credentialing:<br />
BC Locum Program<br />
Some managers within HAs raised a concern that some physicians may view their inclusion on the BC Locum Program (BCLP) registry as legitimacy to practice<br />
as a locum without having to formally apply for privileges. The current system may have potential to be used inappropriately and the Ministry cannot easily check<br />
the credentials of those registered.<br />
The College’s role in credentialing diagnostic imaging restricted activities for the purposes of billing<br />
As discussed in Chapter 3, the College currently plays a statutory role in reviewing credentials of physicians seeking privileges for restricted activities in diagnostic<br />
imaging within a HA-governed facility. This is solely for the purposes of the physician gaining approval to bill the MSP, and the College expects that the HA is<br />
performing its due diligence in granting privileges and monitoring performance.<br />
There are two challenges with this role:<br />
The College’s by-laws do not enumerate this role and consequently the Senior Deputy Registrar (who at present manages this process) may be<br />
operating outside his approved mandate; and<br />
<br />
There was no strong justification provided to substantiate why the College would approve credentials for the purpose of accessing the MSP, when the<br />
HA is reviewing credentials to approve privileges anyway.<br />
Most stakeholders agreed that this was not an appropriate role for the College, although it would require a change in statute if the role were to be performed by<br />
another body/other bodies (i.e. the HAs).<br />
Communication<br />
Through this review we found that the terms ‘Credentialing’ and ‘Privileging’ were used interchangeably, particularly in using the term credentials to refer to the<br />
privileges that a physician has within a practice setting. We identified that this was a contributory factor in perpetuating communication differences and confusion<br />
both between and within organizations.<br />
Communication issues as they relate to credentialing and privileging are primarily associated with performance management information being shared across the<br />
system to inform privileging decisions. These issues are discussed at greater length in the performance management section below.<br />
Ministry of Health 35<br />
Provincial Review of Physician Licensing, Credentialing, Privileging & <strong>Performance</strong> Management<br />
© 2012 KPMG LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative<br />
(“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.