18.09.2015 Views

Performance

provincial-review-physician-licensing

provincial-review-physician-licensing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Clinical leadership in HA and other healthcare providers<br />

Like many professions, physicians are keenly aware if a colleague is not performing to standard.<br />

We learned through the interviews that instead of reporting them, physicians may choose not to<br />

refer their patients to a poor-performing physician. It is difficult to define the cause for this<br />

finding. There are many reasons why a lack of challenge could exist, including payment<br />

mechanisms, mutual trust and empathy. Whatever the reason, our interviews found that doctors<br />

may be less likely to whistleblow and many clinical leaders, themselves doctors, do not feel that<br />

it is their place or role to judge a colleague, let alone actively manage poor performance.<br />

This situation is magnified in organizations where clinical leadership roles are filled on a rotational<br />

basis, that is to say where a leader is chosen not through ability but because it ‘is their turn’.<br />

Leading practice<br />

In response to this challenge of supporting clinical<br />

leadership, PHSA has developed a pilot program to train<br />

and support Department Heads. The approach will include:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Clarifying the role, the requirements, and the<br />

expectations from a Department Head.<br />

Developing and implementing an orientation program.<br />

Developing and implementing a professional<br />

development program for medical administrators.<br />

In these cases, management can be seen to be a burden, a task that administrators may deem<br />

necessary but certainly one that does not motivate the clinical leader to perform anything other<br />

than a preemptory function.<br />

<br />

Remunerating the position considering its importance<br />

in managing and directing medical staff and the impact<br />

that this has on the quality and safety for patients.<br />

Our interviews found that clinical leaders are seldom provided with the necessary training or support to fulfill these roles effectively.<br />

Issues around clinical leadership are further compounded by the professional barrier that sometimes exists between physicians and management, where the<br />

feedback from administrators was that they understand that they are not necessarily equipped to challenge doctors professionally and/or clinically and look to<br />

clinicians to self-regulate and manage themselves more effectively.<br />

During our interviews we were advised many times that one of the main difficulties is that the Chief of Staff role is oftem either not recognized by some local<br />

physicians or perceived to be valued by HAs themselves as an integral part of the management of physicians within the system. This observation appears to go<br />

further than simply a request for greater remuneration, more that those interviewed believe that the clinical leadership role needs to be better understood and<br />

reviewed by the system.<br />

Who the clinical leaders are is usually clear; the fact that they are not motivated to lead is due to a combination of lack of remuneration, status, levers to create<br />

change and management support.<br />

As many physicians are exclusively contracted to perform services through the MSP system rather than having contracts of employment, it may not be in the<br />

interests of the physician to disclose relevant information. A combination of regulation and this inherent conflict in the system has potential to form a major barrier<br />

to open and honest dialogue on performance issues that is not present in other jurisdictions such as the UK where physicians have contracts with the hospitals in<br />

which they work. That system may have greater potential to develop dialogue, because, as employees, doctors may be far less at risk of losing their livelihoods.<br />

Employers also may have a greater duty of care, and provide structured assistance programs to support individuals through any personal and professional<br />

difficulties and performance issues.<br />

Ministry of Health 44<br />

Provincial Review of Physician Licensing, Credentialing, Privileging & <strong>Performance</strong> Management<br />

© 2012 KPMG LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative<br />

(“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!