Performance
provincial-review-physician-licensing
provincial-review-physician-licensing
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Clinical leadership in HA and other healthcare providers<br />
Like many professions, physicians are keenly aware if a colleague is not performing to standard.<br />
We learned through the interviews that instead of reporting them, physicians may choose not to<br />
refer their patients to a poor-performing physician. It is difficult to define the cause for this<br />
finding. There are many reasons why a lack of challenge could exist, including payment<br />
mechanisms, mutual trust and empathy. Whatever the reason, our interviews found that doctors<br />
may be less likely to whistleblow and many clinical leaders, themselves doctors, do not feel that<br />
it is their place or role to judge a colleague, let alone actively manage poor performance.<br />
This situation is magnified in organizations where clinical leadership roles are filled on a rotational<br />
basis, that is to say where a leader is chosen not through ability but because it ‘is their turn’.<br />
Leading practice<br />
In response to this challenge of supporting clinical<br />
leadership, PHSA has developed a pilot program to train<br />
and support Department Heads. The approach will include:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Clarifying the role, the requirements, and the<br />
expectations from a Department Head.<br />
Developing and implementing an orientation program.<br />
Developing and implementing a professional<br />
development program for medical administrators.<br />
In these cases, management can be seen to be a burden, a task that administrators may deem<br />
necessary but certainly one that does not motivate the clinical leader to perform anything other<br />
than a preemptory function.<br />
<br />
Remunerating the position considering its importance<br />
in managing and directing medical staff and the impact<br />
that this has on the quality and safety for patients.<br />
Our interviews found that clinical leaders are seldom provided with the necessary training or support to fulfill these roles effectively.<br />
Issues around clinical leadership are further compounded by the professional barrier that sometimes exists between physicians and management, where the<br />
feedback from administrators was that they understand that they are not necessarily equipped to challenge doctors professionally and/or clinically and look to<br />
clinicians to self-regulate and manage themselves more effectively.<br />
During our interviews we were advised many times that one of the main difficulties is that the Chief of Staff role is oftem either not recognized by some local<br />
physicians or perceived to be valued by HAs themselves as an integral part of the management of physicians within the system. This observation appears to go<br />
further than simply a request for greater remuneration, more that those interviewed believe that the clinical leadership role needs to be better understood and<br />
reviewed by the system.<br />
Who the clinical leaders are is usually clear; the fact that they are not motivated to lead is due to a combination of lack of remuneration, status, levers to create<br />
change and management support.<br />
As many physicians are exclusively contracted to perform services through the MSP system rather than having contracts of employment, it may not be in the<br />
interests of the physician to disclose relevant information. A combination of regulation and this inherent conflict in the system has potential to form a major barrier<br />
to open and honest dialogue on performance issues that is not present in other jurisdictions such as the UK where physicians have contracts with the hospitals in<br />
which they work. That system may have greater potential to develop dialogue, because, as employees, doctors may be far less at risk of losing their livelihoods.<br />
Employers also may have a greater duty of care, and provide structured assistance programs to support individuals through any personal and professional<br />
difficulties and performance issues.<br />
Ministry of Health 44<br />
Provincial Review of Physician Licensing, Credentialing, Privileging & <strong>Performance</strong> Management<br />
© 2012 KPMG LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative<br />
(“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity. All rights reserved.