21.09.2015 Views

Dementia

gi2hff

gi2hff

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The quality of included studies<br />

The quality of the studies included in the survey was evaluated on<br />

the basis of combined index, study design, scope of diagnostic<br />

assessment, sample size, response proportion and overall quality.<br />

Details can be found online in the web appendix to this report¹.<br />

Meta-analysis of dementia prevalence<br />

within GBD regions<br />

There were sufficient studies of good quality to conduct meta-analyses<br />

for 11 of the 21 GBD regions; Western Europe, North America,<br />

Latin America (combining Andean, Central, Southern and Tropical<br />

regions), Asia Pacific high-income, Australasia, East Asia, South-East<br />

Asia and South Asia. For Latin America, we considered it pragmatic<br />

and appropriate to pool studies from across the four GBD regions<br />

to conduct a single continent-wide meta-analysis. Given that the<br />

North American region comprised just Canada and the USA, and<br />

that Canada was represented by a large and well-conducted survey<br />

on a nationally representative sample (19), the national prevalence<br />

figures for Canada were applied to Canada and the USA studies<br />

were meta-analysed to generate estimates for that country.<br />

Modelling the prevalence of dementia<br />

Age-specific and age- and sex-specific meta-analysed dementia<br />

prevalence estimates are described for each region in Table 2.1.<br />

Prevalence increased exponentially with age in each region, doubling<br />

with every 5.5 year increment in age in Asia Pacific, Latin<br />

America and North America, with every 5.6 year increment in East<br />

Asia, every 6.3 years in South Asia and Western Europe, and every<br />

6.7 years in Australasia and South-East Asia. In all regions other<br />

than Asia Pacific and North America, the predicted prevalence for<br />

men was lower (by 19–29%) than that for women. There was a<br />

tendency in all regions for the divergence in prevalence between<br />

men and women to increase with increasing age; however, this was<br />

statistically significant only for the Asia Pacific region. There was<br />

statistically significant heterogeneity (variation in prevalence between<br />

studies within regions) for all regions other than South-East.<br />

Generation of prevalence estimates for<br />

other GBD regions<br />

Where it was impractical to conduct a meta-analysis due to insufficient<br />

data, the default option was to apply relevant estimates from<br />

the Delphi consensus of 2005, representing the best available<br />

estimates of likely dementia prevalence in those regions (12). For a<br />

full description of the strategies used, see online appendix¹.<br />

Estimated prevalence of dementia<br />

Estimated prevalence of dementia for all those aged 60 years and<br />

over, age-standardized to the Western Europe population structure,<br />

can be compared directly between the 21 GBD regions (Tables 2.1<br />

and 2.2 and Figure 2.2). There is a four-fold variation, from 2.07%<br />

(West sub-Saharan Africa) to 8.50% (Latin America). However, most<br />

of the estimated age-standardized prevalence figures lie in a band<br />

between 5% and 7%. The major source of variation is the very low<br />

estimated prevalence for the four regions of sub-Saharan Africa.<br />

Estimation of numbers of people with<br />

dementia<br />

Having applied the age-specific, or age- and sex-specific, prevalence<br />

estimates to UN population projections, it was estimated that<br />

35.6 million people worldwide were living with dementia in 2010<br />

(Table 2.3). Western Europe is the GBD region with the highest<br />

number of people with dementia (7.0 million), closely followed by<br />

East Asia with 5.5 million, South Asia with 4.5 million and North<br />

America with 4.4 million. The nine countries with the largest number<br />

of people with dementia in 2010 (1 million or more) were China<br />

(5.4 million), USA (3.9 million), India (3.7 million), Japan (2.5 million),<br />

Germany (1.5 million), Russia (1.2 million), France (1.1 million), Italy<br />

(1.1 million) and Brazil (1.0 million).<br />

The total number of people with dementia is projected to almost<br />

double every 20 years, to 65.7 million in 2030 and 115.4 million<br />

in 2050. Much of the increase is attributable to increases in the<br />

numbers of people with dementia in LMIC (Figure 2.3); in 2010,<br />

57.7% of all people with dementia lived in LMIC, and this proportion<br />

is expected to rise to 63.4% in 2030 and 70.5% in 2050. The projections<br />

are driven mainly by population growth and demographic<br />

ageing (Table 2.3). World regions fall into three broad groups. Highincome<br />

countries start from a high base, but will experience only a<br />

moderate proportionate increase – a 40% increase in Europe, 63%<br />

in North America, 77% in the southern Latin American cone and<br />

89% in the developed Asia Pacific countries. Other parts of Latin<br />

America and North Africa and the Middle East start from a low base<br />

but will experience a particularly rapid increase – 134–146% in the<br />

rest of Latin America, and 125% in North Africa and the Middle East.<br />

China, India and their neighbours in South Asia and Western Pacific<br />

start from a high base and will also experience rapid growth – 107%<br />

in South Asia and 117% in East Asia. Projected increases for sub-<br />

Saharan Africa (70–94%) are modest and are consistent with limited<br />

demographic ageing in view of persistently high child mortality and<br />

the effects of the HIV epidemic.<br />

1. http://www.who.int/mental_health/publications/dementia_report_2012<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!