index
Natura2000Network.Handbook-for-journalists-
Natura2000Network.Handbook-for-journalists-
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
BLOCK<br />
02 THE ANALYSIS<br />
The journalists´ experience<br />
Opportunities for<br />
communicating the<br />
Natura 2000 Network<br />
on television<br />
Carolina Rueda<br />
Instinto Animal programme, Telemadrid TV station<br />
Journalist specialized in environmental matters with 25 years of<br />
experience in radio, television and magazines. Particularly interested in<br />
biodiversity and conservation areas. She is a contributor to the www.<br />
rednatura2000.info website.<br />
When it comes to communicating the Natura 2000 Network we encounter<br />
several strengths and weaknesses. Among its strengths are its size<br />
and variety, that offer many possibilities for attractive communication.<br />
Nearly 30 per cent of the Spanish territory is full of things to talk about,<br />
with an overwhelming diversity and richness. Moreover, we have the<br />
advantage that the Network connects nature and man. We know that<br />
the sites that are within the network have been included because they<br />
are an example of good practices and prove that the human presence is<br />
compatible with the conservation of biodiversity.<br />
Oppositely, we have to deal with some of its weaknesses. In the first place,<br />
the complexity of the concept. Part of the problem is that the Natura<br />
2000 Network is actually a technical concept relatively complex, and also<br />
very specific, that stems from two European directives: the Birds Directive<br />
and the Habitats Directive. There is a lot of confusion in this respect,<br />
even in scientific circles: some people get it mixed up with the IUCN list<br />
of endangered species, or the Red Book of endangered species. So, if<br />
this happens to them, how would it not happen to the common citizen?<br />
On top of that there is another obvious weakness: the lack of signage<br />
on the sites. The National and Natural Parks have signs marking them<br />
and directing towards them and that is how citizens recognize their geographical<br />
boundaries. They know where they are. That is not the case<br />
with the Natura 2000 Network and the result is that it takes a different<br />
shape in the mind of each one. Urban audiences tend to identify it with<br />
the different traditional protection statuses (parks) and in the rural world<br />
there is more than one who doesn´t even know that he lives inside the<br />
Natura 2000 Network.<br />
44<br />
Natura 2000 Network. Handbook for journalists