21.10.2015 Views

index

Natura2000Network.Handbook-for-journalists-

Natura2000Network.Handbook-for-journalists-

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BLOCK<br />

02 THE ANALYSIS<br />

The journalists´ experience<br />

Opportunities for<br />

communicating the<br />

Natura 2000 Network<br />

on television<br />

Carolina Rueda<br />

Instinto Animal programme, Telemadrid TV station<br />

Journalist specialized in environmental matters with 25 years of<br />

experience in radio, television and magazines. Particularly interested in<br />

biodiversity and conservation areas. She is a contributor to the www.<br />

rednatura2000.info website.<br />

When it comes to communicating the Natura 2000 Network we encounter<br />

several strengths and weaknesses. Among its strengths are its size<br />

and variety, that offer many possibilities for attractive communication.<br />

Nearly 30 per cent of the Spanish territory is full of things to talk about,<br />

with an overwhelming diversity and richness. Moreover, we have the<br />

advantage that the Network connects nature and man. We know that<br />

the sites that are within the network have been included because they<br />

are an example of good practices and prove that the human presence is<br />

compatible with the conservation of biodiversity.<br />

Oppositely, we have to deal with some of its weaknesses. In the first place,<br />

the complexity of the concept. Part of the problem is that the Natura<br />

2000 Network is actually a technical concept relatively complex, and also<br />

very specific, that stems from two European directives: the Birds Directive<br />

and the Habitats Directive. There is a lot of confusion in this respect,<br />

even in scientific circles: some people get it mixed up with the IUCN list<br />

of endangered species, or the Red Book of endangered species. So, if<br />

this happens to them, how would it not happen to the common citizen?<br />

On top of that there is another obvious weakness: the lack of signage<br />

on the sites. The National and Natural Parks have signs marking them<br />

and directing towards them and that is how citizens recognize their geographical<br />

boundaries. They know where they are. That is not the case<br />

with the Natura 2000 Network and the result is that it takes a different<br />

shape in the mind of each one. Urban audiences tend to identify it with<br />

the different traditional protection statuses (parks) and in the rural world<br />

there is more than one who doesn´t even know that he lives inside the<br />

Natura 2000 Network.<br />

44<br />

Natura 2000 Network. Handbook for journalists

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!