23.12.2015 Views

EXPLORATION

1OLPov1

1OLPov1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 5 Controversy, 1975–1991<br />

97<br />

FIGURE 5-10.<br />

The Highly Maneuverable Aircraft Technology (HiMAT) remotely piloted<br />

vehicle exhibited the NASA logotype insignia during its research program<br />

at the Ames-Dryden Flight Research Facility in 1980. (NASA EC-14281)<br />

FIGURE 5-11.<br />

As might be expected, during the decade following the introduction of<br />

the NASA logotype insignia, aircraft markings at various NASA facilities<br />

involved a mixture of old and new logos. Observers were often confused<br />

by scenes of non-uniformity in NASA markings in photographs,<br />

at airshows, and during other public events. Here, a formation flight of<br />

Dryden F-15 and F-104 aircraft in 1980 shows the differences in NASA<br />

markings commonly encountered at the time. (NASA EC80-14126)<br />

FIGURE 5-12.<br />

During the age of the logotype, several aircraft retained the meatball<br />

insignia. Here NASA’s F-106B research aircraft performs a flight<br />

above NASA Langley Research Center in 1979. The aircraft was used<br />

by Langley for storm hazard (lightning strike) and vortex-flap flight<br />

research studies. (NASA L79-7204.1)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!