11.01.2016 Views

Inclusive social development: The next generation of policies for overcoming poverty and reducing inequality in Latin America and the Caribbean

The Latin American and Caribbean region has achieved notable social development in the past decade. However, much remains to be done. The persisting challenges of defeating poverty once and for all and significantly reducing inequality are not only ethical imperatives but also conditions for making progress toward sustainable development, consistently with the recently adopted 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Although the global economy is more complex and uncertain now than in previous years, and prospects for the region are not —in the short term, at least— particularly bright, it is crucial to secure the progress made in social development in the past decade and lose no time in tackling unresolved issues in areas where progress has been insufficient.

The Latin American and Caribbean region has achieved notable social development in the past decade. However, much remains to be done. The persisting challenges of defeating poverty once and for all and significantly reducing inequality are not only ethical imperatives but also conditions for making progress toward sustainable development, consistently with the recently adopted 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
Although the global economy is more complex and uncertain now than in previous years, and prospects for the region are not —in the short term, at least— particularly bright, it is crucial to secure the progress made in social development in the past decade and lose no time in tackling unresolved issues in areas where progress has been insufficient.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Inclusive</strong> <strong>social</strong> <strong>development</strong>: <strong>the</strong> <strong>next</strong> <strong>generation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>policies</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>overcom<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>poverty</strong>...<br />

a significant drop <strong>of</strong> 8 percentage po<strong>in</strong>ts (from 19.3% to 11.3%); however, <strong>the</strong> rate <strong>of</strong> that reduction has fallen <strong>in</strong><br />

recent years, chiefly because <strong>of</strong> food costs ris<strong>in</strong>g more rapidly than <strong>in</strong>flation <strong>in</strong> general. 2<br />

<strong>The</strong>se positive results are associated with a range <strong>of</strong> factors, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g a favourable economic context, notable<br />

improvements <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> labour market <strong>and</strong> a str<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>social</strong> policy <strong>in</strong>itiatives, most notably <strong>the</strong> expansion <strong>and</strong> redef<strong>in</strong>ition<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>policies</strong> <strong>and</strong> programmes <strong>for</strong> <strong>overcom<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>poverty</strong> <strong>and</strong> extreme <strong>poverty</strong> <strong>and</strong> promot<strong>in</strong>g <strong>social</strong> <strong>in</strong>clusion, aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />

a political backdrop where those topics were once aga<strong>in</strong> at <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>efront <strong>of</strong> several countries’ public agendas <strong>and</strong><br />

general <strong>development</strong> strategies.<br />

Thus, between 2002 <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> onset <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational f<strong>in</strong>ancial crisis (2008), <strong>the</strong> region was able to return to rates<br />

<strong>of</strong> growth similar to those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1970s. A boom period occurred between 2003 <strong>and</strong> 2007, with high annual rates <strong>of</strong><br />

GDP growth (around 5%) <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> per capita GDP (3% <strong>for</strong> almost five years runn<strong>in</strong>g), <strong>in</strong> a context <strong>of</strong> positive current<br />

account balances, fiscal surpluses <strong>and</strong> unprecedented <strong>in</strong>ternational reserve levels. This favourable comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong><br />

rapid growth, <strong>in</strong> conjunction with expansionary external conditions, was without precedent <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> region’s recent<br />

history, <strong>and</strong> it was largely driven by <strong>the</strong> boom <strong>in</strong> commodity prices. At <strong>the</strong> same time, unemployment fell notably<br />

(from 11% to 7.4%) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> percentage <strong>of</strong> people liv<strong>in</strong>g beneath <strong>the</strong> <strong>poverty</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e dropped by 10 percentage po<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

(from 44% to 34%) (ECLAC, 2009).<br />

Figure I.2<br />

Lat<strong>in</strong> <strong>America</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Caribbean</strong>: per capita GDP <strong>and</strong> rates <strong>of</strong> <strong>poverty</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>digence, 1990-2014<br />

(Index: 1990=100 <strong>and</strong> percentages <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> population)<br />

Per capita GDP (<strong>in</strong>dex: 1990=100)<br />

150<br />

140<br />

130<br />

120<br />

110<br />

Asian <strong>and</strong> Russian<br />

crises<br />

International f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />

crisis <strong>and</strong> slow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese<br />

economy<br />

55<br />

50<br />

45<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

Percentage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> population<br />

100<br />

1990<br />

1991<br />

1992<br />

1993<br />

10<br />

Chapter I<br />

1994<br />

1995<br />

1996<br />

1997<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

2000<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

2007<br />

2008<br />

2009<br />

2010<br />

2011<br />

2012<br />

2013<br />

2014<br />

Per capita GDP (<strong>in</strong>dex: 1990=100) Indigence Poverty<br />

Source: Economic Commission <strong>for</strong> Lat<strong>in</strong> <strong>America</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Caribbean</strong> (ECLAC), CEPALSTAT database; <strong>and</strong> C. Aravena, L.E. Escobar <strong>and</strong> A. H<strong>of</strong>man, “Fuentes del<br />

crecimiento económico y la productividad en América Lat<strong>in</strong>a y el Caribe, 1990-2013”, Macroeconomía del Desarrollo series, No. 164 (LC/L.4024), Santiago,<br />

ECLAC, 2015.<br />

This process was affected by <strong>the</strong> global f<strong>in</strong>ancial crisis <strong>of</strong> 2008 <strong>and</strong> 2009; however, compared to previous crises,<br />

this one had a lower impact on levels <strong>of</strong> <strong>poverty</strong> <strong>and</strong> extreme <strong>poverty</strong>. This was partly due to <strong>the</strong> countercyclical nature<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> public <strong>social</strong> spend<strong>in</strong>g used to tackle <strong>the</strong> crisis <strong>and</strong>, with<strong>in</strong> that, <strong>the</strong> priority placed on <strong>the</strong> <strong>social</strong> dimension.<br />

That trend was seen both <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased public <strong>social</strong> spend<strong>in</strong>g over time (up to 2010, <strong>the</strong> resources available<br />

<strong>for</strong> fund<strong>in</strong>g <strong>social</strong> services <strong>and</strong> household transfers rose <strong>in</strong> real terms) <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> composition <strong>of</strong> public spend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(greater fiscal priority placed on <strong>social</strong> spend<strong>in</strong>g). In contrast, up to <strong>the</strong> midpo<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first decade <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> century,<br />

<strong>the</strong> evolution <strong>of</strong> public <strong>social</strong> spend<strong>in</strong>g had been highly procyclical. Thus, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> second half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> decade, several<br />

countries began a process <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>social</strong> spend<strong>in</strong>g to exp<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> coverage <strong>of</strong> different <strong>social</strong> programmes,<br />

particularly those geared towards fight<strong>in</strong>g <strong>poverty</strong>, on which such countries as Brazil <strong>and</strong> Mexico had embarked <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> mid-1990s (ECLAC, 2013d).<br />

However, <strong>in</strong> 2012 <strong>and</strong> 2013, <strong>the</strong> <strong>poverty</strong> reduction process stagnated (see ECLAC, 2014a). This occurred <strong>in</strong><br />

a context <strong>of</strong> low global economic growth, <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> commodity boom, heightened <strong>in</strong>flationary pressure <strong>and</strong><br />

curtailed capacity to create <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong>malize employment. Thus, 2012 saw a decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> world economy, comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> European recession, particularly <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> euro zone, <strong>the</strong> deceleration <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a’s economy <strong>and</strong> moderate growth<br />

2<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> Social Panorama <strong>of</strong> Lat<strong>in</strong> <strong>America</strong>, <strong>the</strong> lowest levels <strong>of</strong> <strong>poverty</strong> <strong>and</strong> extreme <strong>poverty</strong> over <strong>the</strong> past three decades were<br />

recorded <strong>in</strong> 2012 (ECLAC, 2013b).<br />

17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!