11.01.2016 Views

Inclusive social development: The next generation of policies for overcoming poverty and reducing inequality in Latin America and the Caribbean

The Latin American and Caribbean region has achieved notable social development in the past decade. However, much remains to be done. The persisting challenges of defeating poverty once and for all and significantly reducing inequality are not only ethical imperatives but also conditions for making progress toward sustainable development, consistently with the recently adopted 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Although the global economy is more complex and uncertain now than in previous years, and prospects for the region are not —in the short term, at least— particularly bright, it is crucial to secure the progress made in social development in the past decade and lose no time in tackling unresolved issues in areas where progress has been insufficient.

The Latin American and Caribbean region has achieved notable social development in the past decade. However, much remains to be done. The persisting challenges of defeating poverty once and for all and significantly reducing inequality are not only ethical imperatives but also conditions for making progress toward sustainable development, consistently with the recently adopted 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
Although the global economy is more complex and uncertain now than in previous years, and prospects for the region are not —in the short term, at least— particularly bright, it is crucial to secure the progress made in social development in the past decade and lose no time in tackling unresolved issues in areas where progress has been insufficient.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Inclusive</strong> <strong>social</strong> <strong>development</strong>: <strong>the</strong> <strong>next</strong> <strong>generation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>policies</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>overcom<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>poverty</strong>...<br />

Around 2012, approximately 30 million young Lat<strong>in</strong> <strong>America</strong>ns between <strong>the</strong> ages <strong>of</strong> 15 <strong>and</strong> 29 were excluded<br />

from <strong>the</strong> dual axis <strong>of</strong> <strong>social</strong> <strong>in</strong>clusion provided by <strong>the</strong> education system <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> labour market (22% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total).<br />

That situation also <strong>in</strong>volved a strong gender dimension: 73.5% <strong>of</strong> those young people were women (ECLAC, 2014a).<br />

That exclusion, however, does not signify a lack <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to society: <strong>the</strong> difficulties<br />

encountered <strong>in</strong> rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> education system or <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g a job are compounded by a significant proportion<br />

<strong>of</strong> young people —women, <strong>in</strong> particular— who per<strong>for</strong>m unpaid domestic work: that is <strong>the</strong> situation <strong>of</strong> 70% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

young women nei<strong>the</strong>r study<strong>in</strong>g nor <strong>in</strong> paid work, compared to 11% <strong>of</strong> men <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same age group <strong>and</strong> situation. If<br />

this is comb<strong>in</strong>ed with o<strong>the</strong>r temporary reasons <strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong>activity (young people wait<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> a job or <strong>for</strong> school to beg<strong>in</strong>)<br />

<strong>and</strong> with those affected by a disability <strong>of</strong> some k<strong>in</strong>d (slightly over 1%), only approximately 3.3% <strong>of</strong> young people<br />

make up <strong>the</strong> “hard core” <strong>of</strong> exclusion (ECLAC, 2015e). <strong>The</strong> rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 17% <strong>of</strong> young people nei<strong>the</strong>r per<strong>for</strong>m<strong>in</strong>g paid<br />

work nor study<strong>in</strong>g constitute a group that should be given <strong>the</strong> opportunities <strong>the</strong>y need both to f<strong>in</strong>ish <strong>the</strong>ir education<br />

<strong>and</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>ue develop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir skills <strong>and</strong> to enter <strong>the</strong> job market <strong>and</strong> construct, <strong>in</strong> better conditions, strategies to<br />

reconcile <strong>the</strong>ir studies, work <strong>and</strong> personal <strong>and</strong> family lives (ECLAC, 2015c).<br />

Box I.4<br />

Young people not <strong>in</strong> education or employment, <strong>in</strong> Brazil:<br />

gender <strong>and</strong> racial <strong>in</strong>equalities<br />

In 2013, 6.5 million young people aged between 15 <strong>and</strong> 24<br />

(19.6% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total) were nei<strong>the</strong>r study<strong>in</strong>g nor occupied <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

labour market.<br />

This situation is strongly marked by <strong>the</strong> gender dimension:<br />

one out <strong>of</strong> every four young women are <strong>in</strong> that situation, a<br />

proportion that is almost double <strong>the</strong> rate seen among young<br />

men. This is primarily due to <strong>the</strong> fact that a large proportion<br />

<strong>of</strong> young women per<strong>for</strong>m a heavy burden <strong>of</strong> unpaid work<br />

(domestic <strong>and</strong> care work) <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir own homes: <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r words,<br />

<strong>the</strong> differences <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> figures reflect <strong>the</strong> relationships <strong>and</strong><br />

gender stereotypes that assign such responsibilities to women<br />

<strong>and</strong> by <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> care systems <strong>and</strong> <strong>policies</strong> to facilitate<br />

<strong>the</strong> reconciliation <strong>of</strong> study, work <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> family. As a result,<br />

despite <strong>the</strong>ir higher levels <strong>of</strong> education, young women report<br />

higher rates <strong>of</strong> unemployment <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>activity <strong>and</strong> lower rates<br />

<strong>of</strong> labour market participation.<br />

Brazil: proportion <strong>of</strong> young people aged 15-24 not <strong>in</strong> education or employed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> labour market,<br />

by sex <strong>and</strong> colour <strong>of</strong> sk<strong>in</strong>, 2004-2013<br />

30<br />

25<br />

29.0 29.3 29.2<br />

29.8<br />

25.9 26.1 25.9 26.0<br />

27.7 28.1<br />

24.5 24.8<br />

29.0 28.9<br />

29.6<br />

25.5 25.5 25.7<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

20.5 20.9 20.9 21.1<br />

18.7 18.7 18.8 18.8<br />

16.7 16.3 16.5 16.3<br />

11.4 11.5 11.7 11.8 11.5<br />

10.3 9.9 10.3 10.5<br />

9.8<br />

19.9 20.3<br />

17.9<br />

18.4<br />

15.4<br />

16.0<br />

12.1<br />

10.8<br />

21.0 21.1<br />

19.0 18.9<br />

16.7<br />

16.0<br />

12.7 12.5<br />

11.8<br />

10.6<br />

21.9<br />

19.6<br />

16.6<br />

13.6<br />

12.1<br />

5<br />

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2011 2012 2013<br />

White men<br />

Total men<br />

Total women<br />

White<br />

Total both sexes<br />

Black<br />

Black women<br />

Source: Brazilian Geographical <strong>and</strong> Statistical Institute (IBGE), National household survey (PNAD), various years.<br />

Racial factors are also an important element <strong>in</strong> this situation:<br />

<strong>the</strong> proportion <strong>of</strong> young Afro-descendants who are <strong>in</strong> nei<strong>the</strong>r<br />

education nor paid work (21.9%) is 5.3 percentage po<strong>in</strong>ts higher<br />

than that <strong>of</strong> young whites (13.6%). In <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> Afro-descendent<br />

women, where gender <strong>and</strong> racial <strong>in</strong>equalities <strong>in</strong>tersect, <strong>the</strong><br />

figure is an even more tell<strong>in</strong>g 29.6%: thus, almost one out <strong>of</strong><br />

every three young Afro-descendent women <strong>in</strong> Brazil are <strong>in</strong> that<br />

situation. <strong>The</strong>se figures showcase <strong>the</strong> difficulties encountered<br />

by young women, particularly Afro-descendants, <strong>in</strong> reconcil<strong>in</strong>g<br />

work with studies <strong>and</strong> family life.<br />

In addition, an analysis <strong>of</strong> youth unemployment rates confirms<br />

<strong>the</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>ued existence <strong>of</strong> major gender <strong>and</strong> racial disparities: <strong>in</strong><br />

spite <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sharper reduction among young women (from 23.3%<br />

to 18.7%) than among young men (from 14.2% to 12.3%) over<br />

<strong>the</strong> same period (2004-2013), <strong>the</strong> unemployment rate rema<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

considerably higher among women than among men; similarly, <strong>the</strong><br />

unemployment rate among young Afro-descendants (16.4%) was<br />

higher than that <strong>of</strong> young whites (13.3%), while <strong>the</strong> rate among<br />

young Afro-descendent women (21.6%) was 10 percentage po<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

higher than that <strong>of</strong> young white males (11.4%).<br />

Chapter I<br />

47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!