14.02.2016 Views

SCHOOL THESIS

?view&did=768625

?view&did=768625

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

employees are granted complete privacy and anonymity when reporting on a fellow<br />

employee’s changed behavior or significant lifestyle changes.<br />

Conclusion 7<br />

Until this year, there has been no systematic method to continuously evaluate<br />

employee behavior or character changes. E.O. 13467 defines continuous evaluation (CE)<br />

as:<br />

reviewing the background of an individual who has been determined to be<br />

eligible for access to classified information (including additional or new<br />

checks of commercial databases, government databases, and other<br />

information lawfully available to security officials) at any time during the<br />

period of eligibility to determine whether that individual continues to meet<br />

the requirements for eligibility for access to classified information. 399<br />

Assessing data automatically derived from credit background checks, social media,<br />

personnel records, and self-reporting records, may reveal relevant information, prompting<br />

further investigation and enabling agencies to prioritize their efforts on those who appear<br />

to have the highest risk. As noted earlier, there are many inaccuracies in obtaining data in<br />

the initial clearance process. This could be critical information in granting or not granting<br />

a clearance. Recently, the Department of Defense initiated a pilot program that tested the<br />

validity of its Automated Continuous Evaluation System (ACES). The test program<br />

sampled 3,370 Army service members, civilian employees, and contractor personnel. It<br />

discovered that 21.7 percent of the tested population had previously unreported<br />

derogatory information that had developed since the last investigation, and three percent<br />

had serious derogatory information (for example, financial issues, domestic abuse, drug<br />

abuse) that resulted in a revocation or suspension of a security clearance. 400 The<br />

frequency of these data checks would allow for a more real-time assessment to better<br />

monitor the behavior of any clearance holder and alert security officers for the need to<br />

399 Exec. Order No. 13467.<br />

400 Joe Davidson, “More Frequent Automated Security Clearance Checks Likely in Defense and Other<br />

Agencies,” The Federal Diary, March 25, 2013,<br />

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/federal_government/more-frequent-automated-security-clearance-<br />

checks-likely-in-defense-and-other-agencies/2014/03/25/6d313b80-b43e-11e3-b899-<br />

20667de76985_story.html<br />

113

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!