Biotech financing
25WmEet
25WmEet
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Slowdown ahead?<br />
Since the US garners the vast majority of all biotech <strong>financing</strong><br />
(86% in 2015), it makes sense to view it as a proxy for the<br />
overall health of the industry. And signs of a financial slowdown<br />
are readily available.<br />
In the fourth quarter of 2015, for instance, activity decelerated<br />
significantly in nearly every fundraising category except venture<br />
capital, which held remarkably steady throughout the year.<br />
Fourth quarter IPO activity shrank appreciably: biotechs raised<br />
US$1.4 billion via 11 offerings in the third quarter, but in the<br />
fourth quarter, newly public biotechs raised only US$497 million<br />
across eight deals. Most ominously, no biotechs went public,<br />
in the US or anywhere else, during December 2015 and<br />
January 2016.<br />
The drop in follow-on offerings was even more pronounced:<br />
in the third quarter, biotechs pulled in US$4.4 billion across<br />
48 deals, but in the fourth quarter, that fell to US$1.2 billion<br />
across 27 deals. Debt practically vanished, too, but the third<br />
quarter’s total was unusually high as a result of US$24 billion<br />
raised by stalwarts Gilead Sciences, Biogen and Celgene.<br />
In this environment,<br />
the question to ask<br />
isn’t whether the<br />
climate is changing,<br />
but just how long this<br />
winter will last.<br />
Beyond borders 2016 — <strong>Biotech</strong> <strong>financing</strong><br />
5