12.04.2016 Views

Biotech financing

25WmEet

25WmEet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Slowdown ahead?<br />

Since the US garners the vast majority of all biotech <strong>financing</strong><br />

(86% in 2015), it makes sense to view it as a proxy for the<br />

overall health of the industry. And signs of a financial slowdown<br />

are readily available.<br />

In the fourth quarter of 2015, for instance, activity decelerated<br />

significantly in nearly every fundraising category except venture<br />

capital, which held remarkably steady throughout the year.<br />

Fourth quarter IPO activity shrank appreciably: biotechs raised<br />

US$1.4 billion via 11 offerings in the third quarter, but in the<br />

fourth quarter, newly public biotechs raised only US$497 million<br />

across eight deals. Most ominously, no biotechs went public,<br />

in the US or anywhere else, during December 2015 and<br />

January 2016.<br />

The drop in follow-on offerings was even more pronounced:<br />

in the third quarter, biotechs pulled in US$4.4 billion across<br />

48 deals, but in the fourth quarter, that fell to US$1.2 billion<br />

across 27 deals. Debt practically vanished, too, but the third<br />

quarter’s total was unusually high as a result of US$24 billion<br />

raised by stalwarts Gilead Sciences, Biogen and Celgene.<br />

In this environment,<br />

the question to ask<br />

isn’t whether the<br />

climate is changing,<br />

but just how long this<br />

winter will last.<br />

Beyond borders 2016 — <strong>Biotech</strong> <strong>financing</strong><br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!