Atonement
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
RECOVERING BIBLICAL AT-ONE-MENT : M.<br />
M. M. NINAN<br />
their wrath. Sacrifices are the expressions of penitance leading to change of behavior. But God the<br />
Father presented by Jesus is the embodiment of goodness, justice, and mercy. My Father does not<br />
need a bribe to convince him to be just or merciful because he is the very definition of justice and<br />
mercy. God does not need an appeasement to forgive.<br />
“But I tell you: Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be sons of your<br />
Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous<br />
and the unrighteous... Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.”<br />
(Math 5:44-45, 48)<br />
There are several problems with this approach if we push the metaphor too far. The answers to these<br />
problems will lead to additional metaphoric explanations and understanding of the cross. This idea is<br />
not new.<br />
Scot McKnight in his blog writes: "What I want to say is not that this theory is wrong... I want to say is<br />
that the atonement is so much more than this. And, if it is so much more than this, then it follows that<br />
using “penal substitution” as our guiding term is inadequate and misleads others. At the least, it does<br />
not provide enough information to explain what one really believes occurs in the <strong>Atonement</strong>"<br />
This brought about strong criticism by the end of the sixteenth century this interpretation of atonement<br />
came under severe criticism by Pelagian, Faustus Socinus, and others.<br />
The Reformers saw Jesus as undergoing vicarious punishment (poena) to meet the claims on us of<br />
God’s holy law and wrath (i.e. his punitive justice).<br />
What Socinus did was to arraign this idea as irrational, incoherent, immoral and impossible.<br />
68