You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
THE APOSTLES : M.M.NINAN<br />
Hebrew make the equation impossible so that two different Marys are meant. Some want to<br />
equate Alphaeus, Cleophas, and the Cleopas of Luke 24:18.<br />
2. The father of the apostle Levi (Mark 2:14). Comparison of Matthew 9:9 and Luke 5:27 would<br />
indicate Levi was also called Matthew.<br />
Alphaeus in the Bible Encyclopedia - ISBE al-fe'-us (Alphaios; Westcott and Hort, The New<br />
Testament in Greek, Halphaios):<br />
(1) The father of the second James in the list of the apostles (Mt 10:3; Mk 3:18; Lk 6:15; Acts 1:13).<br />
(2) The father of Levi, the publican (Mk 2:14). Levi is designated as Matthew in the Gospel of Mt<br />
(9:9).<br />
There is no other reference to this Alpheus.<br />
Some writers, notably Weiss, identify the father of Levi with the father of the second James. He<br />
says that James and Levi were undoubtedly brothers; but that seems improbable. If they were<br />
brothers they would quite likely be associated as are James and John, Andrew and Peter.<br />
Chrysostom says James and Levi had both been tax-gatherers before they became followers of<br />
Jesus. This tradition would not lend much weight as proof that they were brothers, for it might arise<br />
through identifying the two names, and the western manuscripts do identify them and read James<br />
instead of Levi in Mk 2:14. This, however, is undoubtedly a corruption of the text. If it had been the<br />
original it would be difficult to explain the substitution of an unknown Levi for James who is well<br />
known.<br />
Many writers identify Alpheus, the father of the second James, with Clopas of Jn 19:25. This had<br />
early become a tradition, and Chrysostom believed they were the same person. This identity rests<br />
on four suppositions, all of which are doubtful:<br />
(a) That the Mary of Clopas was the same as the Mary who was the mother of the second James.<br />
There is a difference of opinion as to whether "Mary of Clopas" should be understood to be the wife<br />
of Clopas or the daughter of Clopas, but the former is more probable. We know from Mt 27:56 and<br />
Mk 15:40 that there was a James who was the son of Mary, and that this Mary belonged to that<br />
little group of women that was near Jesus it the time of the crucifixion. It is quite likely that this Mary<br />
is the one referred to in Jn 19:25. That would make James, the son of Mary of Mt 27:56, the son of<br />
Mary of Clopas. But Mary was such a common name In the New Testament that this supposition<br />
cannot be proven.<br />
(b) That the James, who was the son of Mary, was the same person as the James, the son of<br />
Alpheus. Granting the supposition under (a), this would not prove the identity of Clopas and