BK Perspective Real Estate USA 2016
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Perspective</strong> on <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong> <strong>2016</strong> - U.S.<br />
Technology Drivers & Disruptors<br />
Codeacademy, Khan Academy and Skillshare, allow users<br />
anywhere to learn to write code for little to no money.<br />
Technology will reduce the barriers and costs associated with<br />
educating and training workers for jobs in the new economy<br />
as technological innovation reduces the need for less skilled<br />
workers.<br />
All of these technologies, plus a number of others, have led<br />
to rapid growth in STEM (science, technology, engineering<br />
and math) employment and in the rise of technology as<br />
America’s primary growth engine. Significant investment<br />
and wealth have been created alongside the hope that<br />
these technologies are poised for exponential growth. Many<br />
of these new technology firms are private companies that<br />
have been funded by venture capital firms, high net worth<br />
investors, private equity firms and the like. Investment<br />
analysts have nicknamed private companies with valuations of<br />
$1 billion or more “Unicorns.”<br />
According to CB Insights, there were 144 “Unicorns” with a<br />
cumulative valuation of $525 billion at the end of 2015. The<br />
most highly valued of these, one and a half year-old, Uber,<br />
had a valuation of $51 billion. Fourteen firms had a valuation<br />
of $10 billion or more and seven had a valuation of $5 to<br />
$9.9 billion. Mutual funds, banks, sovereign wealth funds and<br />
hedge funds have recently begun investing in these start-ups<br />
as well, and more than two-thirds of Unicorn companies now<br />
have one or more such investors. All of this capital flowing<br />
into technology start-ups has caused some to question<br />
whether we are in the midst of a technology bubble that<br />
could rival the 1998-2001 dot.com bubble.<br />
While private market valuations are incredibly high and<br />
there are some signs that many of these values will not hold<br />
up, this cycle is different in many ways from that of the dot.<br />
com era. First, most (but not all) of these companies have<br />
proprietary technologies, are creating products and services<br />
that the market desires and are generating revenues. Second,<br />
public sector valuations are not nearly as high as they were<br />
during the go-go days of the late-1990s. As of year-end 2015,<br />
the P/E of the technology sector was 23.8. By contrast, in<br />
March 2000, technology companies had a mean P/E ratio<br />
of 156. Third, the current technology boom is much more<br />
multifaceted and is not as one dimensional as was the dot.<br />
com boom, which primarily focused on online retailing.<br />
There are, however, significant risks. Firstly, private market<br />
valuations are incredibly high and recent evidence suggests<br />
that many of those valuations may not materialize when and<br />
if the firms go public. In 2015, just five Unicorn companies<br />
Fig. 2.11<br />
CBInsights $10 Billion+ Unicorn Companies<br />
Company Valuation (bil.) Date Joined Country Industry<br />
Uber $51 Aug. 2013 United States On-Demand<br />
Xiaomi $46 Dec. 2011 China Hardware<br />
Airbnb $26 Jul. 2011 United States eCommerce/Marketplace<br />
Palantir Technologies $20 May. 2011 United States Big Data<br />
Snapchat $16 Dec. 2013 United States Social<br />
China Internet Plus Holding $15 Dec. 2015 China eCommerce/Marketplace<br />
Didi Kuaidi $15 Dec. 2014 China On-Demand<br />
Flipkart $15 Aug. 2012 India eCommerce/Marketplace<br />
SpaceX $12 Dec. 2012 United States Other Transportation<br />
Pinterest $11 May 2012 United States Social<br />
DJI Innovations $10 May 2015 China Hardware<br />
Dropbox $10 Oct. 2011 United States Internet Software & Services<br />
Lufax $10 Dec. 2014 China Fintech<br />
WeWork $10 Feb. 2014 United States Facilities<br />
Source: CBInsights, Data as of January, <strong>2016</strong><br />
24 | Bentall Kennedy (U.S.) Limited Partnership