People Places Practices

Recommendations

Info

To improve the efficiency of our operations, Johnson & Johnson has implemented five targeted demand-side efficiency efforts (see below) designed to optimize the largest energyusing systems at our most energy-intensive manufacturing and research properties. These programs have realized reductions in both energy and water use. In 2015, we began expanding these programs beyond North America and the Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) region into Asia-Pacific and Latin America. Converting existing chilled water systems into an optimized variable condition by taking advantage of state-of-the-art control technology. Clean Energy Sources Modernizing steam and hot water systems by utilizing a mix of proven best practices and new technologies to increase efficiency. Implementing continuous monitoring, improved controls, efficient drying and heat recovery on our largest compressed air systems. Retro-commissioning the HVAC systems at our largest properties using real-time controls and set-point optimization. Systematically upgrading existing fluorescent lighting systems to LED technology to provide better light quality and control while improving efficiency. Fuel Cell 2 Biomass 2 Geothermal 3 Wind 17 Cogeneration 36 Solar PV 40 While energy efficiency improvements are one way to address climate change, the use of clean energy sources is a way to reduce the environmental impact of the energy our business needs to operate. At the end of 2015, we have increased our on-site clean/renewable energy technology capacity to 54 megawatts (MWs), exceeding our Healthy Future 2015 goal of 50 MWs. 21 Of this, 53.5 MWs are currently installed and 0.5 MWs are approved or under construction. Efforts in 2015 include two fuel cell projects in California, and the construction of a new windmill project in Ireland, which was completed in early 2016. Currently, approximately seven percent of the Company’s electricity is generated Percent of Total by clean/renewable sources. Our 2020 goal, updated in 2016, is to produce/procure 20 percent of our electricity needs from clean/ renewable sources by 2020, with an aspiration to power all our facilities with renewable energy by 2050. Current On-Site Renewable/ Clean Energy Capacity 54 Megawatts Fuel Cell 2% (installed or in progress) Biomass 2% Geothermal 3% Project Solar PV cAIR 40% Project HOT Project cAIR Project HOT Project cAIR Project HOT Project cAIR Project HOT Wind 17% Cogeneration 36% At Our Vision Care facility in Limerick, Ireland, a 3.0 MW wind turbine completed in early 2016 is the latest project in a series of energy use and CO 2 emission reduction efforts ongoing since 2006, which through the end of 2015 have reduced the energy cost and CO 2 emissions at that location by nearly 30 percent. These efforts continue into 2016 with Solar PV additional energy efficiency and water use reduction projects. An “energy Congeneration wall” (below) at the facility explains and tracks the site efforts. Wind Geothermal Biomass Fuel Cell 21. Performance is lower than clean energy capacity reported in 2014 report (55.7 MW) based on recalculations due to divestitures. 2015 Citizenship & Sustainability Report 48
Energy Consumption in Terajoules Facility CO 2 Emissions 22 We continue to follow the Greenhouse Gas Protocol issued by the World Business Council for Sustainable Development and the World Resources Institute, and three of our sites are subject to the European Union Emissions Trading System program. We track and report our Scope 1 and 2 emissions sources. In launching our new science-based 2020 CO 2 reduction goal, we also expanded the scope of the goal to include our aviation fleet and sales fleet. We continue to engage with our external supply chain in an effort to collect meaningful data on our material Scope 3 emissions sources and collaborate with them on reducing their carbon footprint. Our Healthy Future 2015 goal is to achieve a 20 percent absolute reduction in facility CO 2 emissions by 2020, compared to our 2010 baseline. Since 2010, we have realized a 9.8 percent decrease in CO 2 emissions at our facilities globally. In 2015, we realized a 0.7 percent decrease in CO 2 emissions, from 1,122,888 metric tons in 2014 to 1,114,764 metric tons in 2015. These reductions are the result of energy efficiency and clean energy projects, the electricity grid becoming cleaner across the globe and portfolio optimization. Our emissions intensity (including Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions) per revenue since 2010 has decreased by more than 20 percent, from 20.1. MT CO 2/million USD in 2010 to 15.9 MT CO 2/million USD in 2015. EN18 We currently do not use carbon offsets to reduce our global emissions footprint. The Scope 3 emissions currently tracked include employee business travel, non-hazardous waste generated from our operations, electricity-related transmission and distribution losses, and limited downstream (U.S. only) transportation emissions. Evaluation of opportunities for engagement and improvement within our Scope 3 footprint continue, and an input/output analysis has been performed to identify emissions hot spots within our value chain. We continue to participate in the CDP supply chain climate program where we ask our largest suppliers to report energy and emissions data for their operations. For more information, see Worldwide Facility CO 2e Emissions (Scope 1 and Scope 2) EN15 23 EN16 in thousand metric tons 25 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 332 313 303 323 324 312 904 859 822 810 799 803 23, 24 Total 1,236 1,172 1,125 1,132 1,123 1,115 0 200 400 800 1,200 1,500 Direct Indirect 22. Recalculation for Emission Factors: It is standard for reporting on Scope 2 GHG emissions to use electricity factors with a twoyear lapse time due to the delay in the availability of grid and country emission factors for a specific year. For this reason, we use the most recent emission factors available when reporting emissions, and then recalculate emissions for prior years when the actual factors become available. 23. Johnson & Johnson does not currently use purchases, sales or transfers of offsets or allowances. Gases included in these calculations include only CO2, as that is how our goal was originally written, but we have calculated methane and nitrous oxide emissions from 2010 forward, and these are included in our new goal. Hydrofluorocarbons (CFCs) are tracked by EHS&S. Perfluorinated chemicals, sulfur hexafluoride and nitrogen trifluoride do not result from our operations. We do not calculate or report biogenic CO2 emissions in metric tons of CO2 equivalent separately from the gross direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions. Base year is 2010, included in table. Emissions in base year have been recalculated to adjust for acquisitions and divestitures in accordance with guidance from World Resources Institute Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard. We follow the World Resources Institute Worldwide Aviation and Sales Fleet Scope 1 Emissions in metric tons 2010 Year Sales Fleet Aviation 2011 150,003 8,544 2012 2011 142,709 8,571 2013 132,973 9,081 2014 130,755 10,604 2012 2015 127,640 9,855 Worldwide CO 2 Emissions vs. Sales, Facility-related Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions, 1990–2015 CO2 Emissions (thousand metric tons) Sales (billion US$) 1,400 1400 CO2 emissions (thousand metric tons) Sales (billion US$) $90 1,200 1200 1,000 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Net emissions Sales 2013 2014 2015 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 75 60 45 30 30 15 15 Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard. Electricity emission factors are obtained from the International Energy Agency’s CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion Report and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s eGRID publication. Fuel emission factors are obtained from the EPA Climate Leaders publication. Global Warming Potentials are obtained from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fifth Assessment Report. The chosen consolidation approach for emissions is operational control. 24. Facility CO2 emissions numbers were third party–assured in 2010–2015, but prior year values are being restated due to updates in electricity grid emission factors and the addition and removal of acquisitions and divestitures, which is in line with guidance from the World Resource Institute’s Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Standard. 0 25. Emissions data are adjusted for prior years due to divestitures, acquisitions and updated emissions factors. As a result, data presented here will not correspond to the figures in the 2014 Report or those submitted to CDP in the respective years. For information on how data from acquisitions and divestitures are managed, please see the Report Profile section of this report. 2015 Citizenship & Sustainability Report 49
Page 1 and 2: People. Places. Practices. Finding
Page 3 and 4: Our Credo We believe our first resp
Page 5 and 6: Provided below are the material are
Page 7 and 8: Sales by Geographic Region (in bill
Page 9 and 10: Citizenship & 2020 GOALS Sustainabi
Page 11 and 12: Goal: Achieve World Health Organiza
Page 13 and 14: Our Materiality Assessment G4-18-21
Page 15 and 16: People We’ll help people be healt
Page 17 and 18: • Piloting and scaling therapeuti
Page 19 and 20: Tuberculosis Our goal in TB is to e
Page 21 and 22: Access & Affordability of Health Ca
Page 23 and 24: MDR-TB therapies, expanding upon th
Page 25 and 26: Innovation Innovation is critical t
Page 27 and 28: are taking an integrated approach t
Page 29 and 30: Philanthropy At Johnson & Johnson,
Page 31 and 32: implement projects that would build
Page 33 and 34: 9 Environmental Responsibility G4-1
Page 35 and 36: Product Stewardship With the world
Page 37 and 38: ® Selected Products that Received
Page 39 and 40: INCREASING RECYCLING IN THE BATHROO
Page 41 and 42: Our Ingredients & Raw Materials Our
Page 43 and 44: Progressive palm oil policies and p
Page 45 and 46: Climate Human health and environmen
Page 47: Energy Use 18 We made good progress
Page 51 and 52: goods transport, we work with our t
Page 53 and 54: Percentage of Water Consumption Ant
Page 55 and 56: that will enable focused environmen
Page 57 and 58: Notable Waste Reduction Projects, 2
Page 59 and 60: Governance & Ethical Performance Ou
Page 61 and 62: Supply Chain The Customer is at the
Page 63 and 64: triggers to allow escalation of sig
Page 65 and 66: Supply Chain Risk Management Johnso
Page 67 and 68: Procurement & Supplier Management T
Page 69 and 70: EN33, LA15, HR11, S010 Responsible
Page 71 and 72: • Support initiatives to verify s
Page 73 and 74: 42 Human Rights G4-58 Johnson & Joh
Page 75 and 76: Labor Practices 44, 45 & Workforce
Page 77 and 78: We currently have 11 Board members,
Page 79 and 80: Employee Recruitment, Development &
Page 81 and 82: Workplace 50 Health & Safety functi
Page 83 and 84: lower in Asia-Pacific, EMEA and Lat
Page 85 and 86: Health-Conscious, 54 Safe Employees
Page 87 and 88: These services are centered on prev
Page 89 and 90: Employee Diversity & Inclusion Our
Page 91 and 92: Stakeholder Engagement G4-24-G4-27
Page 93 and 94: and individuals; and recognizing ex
Page 95 and 96: Report Profile G4-13, G4-23, G4 28-
Page 97 and 98: 2015 Data Summary Table Employee He
Page 99 and 100:
2015 Data Summary Table Environment
Page 101 and 102:
2015 Data Summary Table 21 Operatio
Page 103 and 104:
United Nations Global Compact Envir
Page 105 and 106:
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) I
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
show all

People Places Practices

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?