Government Security News August Digital Edition
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Border <strong>Security</strong>/Immigration<br />
Why the Department of Homeland <strong>Security</strong><br />
should also end private prison contracts<br />
By Walter Ewing,<br />
American Immigration Coucil<br />
For two years, women and children<br />
from Honduras, El Salvador,<br />
and Guatemala have been fleeing to<br />
the United States to escape the extreme<br />
violence of gangs which control<br />
large swaths of territory within<br />
their home countries. And for two<br />
years the Obama Administration<br />
has responded to this humanitarian<br />
crisis by locking up the women<br />
and children seeking protection<br />
and then deporting them back to<br />
the countries where their lives may<br />
be in danger. In defiance of its obligations<br />
under international law,<br />
the Administration is<br />
Photo: Neil Conway<br />
trying to deter future Central<br />
American asylum<br />
seekers by coming down<br />
hard on current Central<br />
American asylum seekers.<br />
During that first “surge”<br />
of refugees two years ago, the<br />
Administration knew exactly what<br />
it needed to get a handle on the crisis:<br />
a bigger and better prison for<br />
women and children. And so, according<br />
to the Washington Post, the<br />
Administration handed a $1 billion,<br />
four-year contract to Corrections<br />
Corporation of America (CCA) to<br />
build a “massive detention facility<br />
for women and children seeking<br />
asylum.” In the sweetest of sweetheart<br />
deals, CCA “gets the money<br />
regardless of how many people are<br />
detained at the facility.”<br />
The facility in question<br />
is the South Texas Family<br />
Residential Center in Dilley,<br />
Texas. According to the<br />
Post:<br />
“In 2015, the first full year<br />
in which the South Texas<br />
Family Residential Center<br />
was operating, CCA—which<br />
operates 74 facilities—made<br />
30<br />
14 percent of its revenue<br />
from that one center<br />
while recording record<br />
profit. CCA declined to<br />
specify the costs of operating<br />
the center.”<br />
The Administration’s heavyhanded<br />
approach to the social turmoil<br />
currently engulfing Honduras,<br />
El Salvador, and Guatemala may<br />
mean big money for private contractors,<br />
but it’s not going to be an<br />
effective deterrent to women who<br />
are running for their lives or the<br />
lives of their children. If you or your<br />
child face murder, rape, or forced<br />
induction into a gang if you stay, as<br />
opposed to a slim chance of asylum<br />
if you head to the United States,<br />
then common sense dictates you<br />
head to the United States.<br />
Moreover, even looked at from a<br />
purely financial standpoint, CCA<br />
isn’t running a very cost-effective<br />
prison. The Post writes that:<br />
“When 2,400 people are detained,<br />
the government spends<br />
what amounts to $285 per day, per<br />
person, according to a Post calculation.<br />
When the facility is half-full,<br />
More on page 43