08.12.2016 Views

Survival of the Richest

survival_of_the_richest_FINAL

survival_of_the_richest_FINAL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Latvia<br />

Transparency<br />

Public country by country reporting<br />

Latvia has, in accordance with <strong>the</strong> legal requirements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

EU, introduced public CBCR for <strong>the</strong> financial industry. 518 The<br />

government is planning to introduce non-public CBCR for<br />

multinational corporations with a turnover <strong>of</strong> a minimum <strong>of</strong><br />

€750 million by <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> 2016. 519<br />

The government supports <strong>the</strong> European Commission’s<br />

proposal to require big multinational corporations (with<br />

an annual turnover <strong>of</strong> €750 million) to publish country by<br />

country reports on <strong>the</strong>ir operations in EU Member States<br />

and so called “non-cooperative jurisdictions” (but not from<br />

all countries where <strong>the</strong>y do business). The government<br />

does not support a lower threshold for which companies<br />

should be required to report, nor does it support <strong>the</strong><br />

proposal for full public country by country reporting (which<br />

would require multinational corporations to report from all<br />

countries where <strong>the</strong>y operate). 520<br />

Ownership transparency<br />

Latvia is planning to transpose <strong>the</strong> EU’s 4th Anti Money<br />

Laundering Directive into national legislation by <strong>the</strong> end<br />

<strong>of</strong> 2016. The government is planning to establish a lower<br />

threshold (than <strong>the</strong> 25 per cent shareholding mentioned in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Directive) for <strong>the</strong> definition <strong>of</strong> ‘beneficial owner’, and<br />

to list <strong>the</strong> beneficial owner regardless <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ownership<br />

percentages in <strong>the</strong> company. However, <strong>the</strong> government<br />

also plans to include very limited access to <strong>the</strong> register<br />

<strong>of</strong> beneficial owners, allowing only “persons who have an<br />

obligation under <strong>the</strong> law to carry out State administration<br />

tasks” to see <strong>the</strong> information. Given that <strong>the</strong> Directive<br />

specifies that everyone who can document a ‘legitimate<br />

interest’ should be given access to <strong>the</strong> information, 521 it<br />

is not clear that <strong>the</strong> Latvian access requirement is wide<br />

enough to be in line with <strong>the</strong> directive.<br />

In addition, Latvia has no plans to make amendments to <strong>the</strong><br />

regulatory framework on trusts. 522<br />

Latvia’s position regarding <strong>the</strong> European Commission’s<br />

proposal on public registers <strong>of</strong> beneficial owners <strong>of</strong><br />

companies and some trusts is unclear, but taken <strong>the</strong><br />

government’s current plans, it seems unlikely that Latvia<br />

would support public access.<br />

According to <strong>the</strong> 2015 Financial Secrecy Index, Latvia has<br />

<strong>the</strong> twelth highest level <strong>of</strong> financial secrecy out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 18<br />

countries included in this report (ranked at number 59 at <strong>the</strong><br />

global level). 523<br />

Taxation<br />

Tax treaties<br />

When negotiating tax treaties with developing countries,<br />

Latvia uses <strong>the</strong> OECD Model with individual provisions <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> UN model. Anti-abuse clauses have been included in<br />

some treaties, namely with India, Kuwait and United Arab<br />

Emirates. There are currently plans to negotiate a new<br />

treaty with Bahrain. 525<br />

According to <strong>the</strong> government, Latvia takes into consideration<br />

that any treaties signed, or planned, with developing<br />

countries should align with <strong>the</strong> contracting country’s<br />

priorities. For example, <strong>the</strong> treaty with Pakistan, as well<br />

as o<strong>the</strong>rs, retains <strong>the</strong> option <strong>of</strong> withholding taxes in <strong>the</strong><br />

country <strong>of</strong> source from income such as royalties, interest<br />

income and dividends. Latvia has not, however, conducted a<br />

spillover analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> potential effects <strong>of</strong> its tax treaties on<br />

developing countries, nor does <strong>the</strong> government plan to do so.<br />

In total, Latvia has 22 tax treaties with developing countries,<br />

which is significantly below <strong>the</strong> average (42 treaties) among<br />

<strong>the</strong> countries covered by this report. The average reduction<br />

<strong>of</strong> developing country tax rates within those treaties – 4.4<br />

percentage points – is, however, significantly above <strong>the</strong><br />

average (3.8 percentage points) among <strong>the</strong> countries<br />

covered by this report. 526 This means that <strong>the</strong> relatively few<br />

tax treaties which Latvia has with developing countries have<br />

a relatively high negative impact on <strong>the</strong> tax rates <strong>of</strong> those<br />

countries. While <strong>the</strong> average reduction <strong>of</strong> tax rates is high,<br />

Latvia does not have any tax treaties that stand out as ‘very<br />

restrictive’. 527<br />

Harmful tax practices<br />

According to a study on aggressive tax planning structures,<br />

Latvia exhibits 13 indicators <strong>of</strong> such structures, which<br />

makes it <strong>the</strong> country with <strong>the</strong> fifth highest number <strong>of</strong><br />

indicators in <strong>the</strong> EU. 528 Latvia does not have a patent box and<br />

no o<strong>the</strong>r active indicators were found.<br />

Latvia is known for its favourable holding regime, in<br />

force since January 2013. Certain income from European<br />

subsidiaries, such as dividends, can be paid to a Latvian<br />

holding company without being taxed at all. Dividends can<br />

also be paid out to a foreign parent company, again with zero<br />

per cent tax. 529 This contributes to making Latvia an attractive<br />

destination for multinationals looking to cut <strong>the</strong>ir tax bills.<br />

Latvia <strong>of</strong>fers advance pricing agreements (or ‘swee<strong>the</strong>art<br />

deals’) to multinational corporations, although at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong><br />

2015, <strong>the</strong>re was only one such agreement in force. 530 The<br />

government does not support making essential elements <strong>of</strong><br />

tax rulings public. 531<br />

76 • <strong>Survival</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Richest</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!