GV Newsletter January 2017

More documents

Recommendations

Info

TRANSPORTATION GOALS ESTABLISHED IN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1. Because traffic management is a critical concern of the Village, the Transportation Plan should be aggressively implemented; the tenets of the plan should be rigorously applied to new development. • In order to understand the full impacts and implications of development staff will continue to assess traffic impacts based on an impact radius considered appropriate. • Level of Service (LOS) standards shall not be the sole determinant of whether to mitigate a traffic impact resulting from a development. LOS should continue to be one factor in determining appropriate exactions and dedications expected from a development. • Impact assessments should consider the net difference between the market occupancy of an existing building compared to what is proposed. 2. Protect the Village’s residential neighborhoods by minimizing the incursion of commercial and transient traffic into residential neighborhoods. 3. Accommodate anticipated commercial development by facilitating commercial traffic flow along arterial streets supported by other means of transportation. 4. Provide convenient access to the Village’s residential neighborhoods for local traffic. 5. Encourage non-motorized travel throughout the Village by providing safe, convenient/bicycle routes. 6. Minimize non-local traffic around the Village’s public areas such as schools and neighborhood parks. 7. Encourage implementation of mass transit systems and other alternatives to single occupant vehicles. 8. Maintain designated truck routes 2011 IDENTIFIED POTENTIAL ROADWAY WIDENIN throughout the Village using size and weight limitations. 9. Provide convenient and safe bicycle access to all Village recreation areas and schools from all part of the Village. 10. Street and traffic impacts adjacent to a proposed development should PG. 24 GV NEWSLETTER | JANUARY 2017
G — REFER TO PAGE 31 be addressed subject to the traffic impact assessment discussion noted above. 11. The Village should strengthen working relationships with adjacent municipalities to address traffic issues of mutual concern. 12. To make certain that new development does not adversely impact the quality and character of the Village, the exaction and continued on page 26 JANUARY 2017 | GV NEWSLETTER PG. 25
Page 2 and 3: ORCHARD STATION SUBAREA: AN INTRODU
Page 4 and 5: GOVERNMENT A PLANNED CITY IS A SUCC
Page 6 and 7: continued from page 4 Each of the p
Page 8 and 9: ORCHARD STATION SUBAREA: CURRENT LA
Page 10 and 11: ORCHARD STATION SUBAREA: THE PLANNI
Page 12 and 13: SCENARIO A (AS PRESENTED ON AUGUST
Page 14 and 15: SCENARIO C (AS PRESENTED ON AUGUST
Page 16 and 17: NEEDLE TOWERS HEIGHT CONCEPT The Co
Page 18 and 19: SCENARIO B MODIFIED - CITY COUNCIL
Page 20 and 21: continued from page 19 employees th
Page 22 and 23: continued from page 21 ensure easy
Page 26 and 27: 2011 IDENTIFIED INTERSECTION DELAYS
Page 28 and 29: CONSULTANT IDENTIFIED RECOMMENDED I
Page 30 and 31: CONSULTANT IDENTIFIED RECOMMENDED I
Page 32: 6060 South Quebec Street Greenwood

GV Newsletter January 2017

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?