Subject
StatementofAccounts2015-2016V11StA
StatementofAccounts2015-2016V11StA
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Notes to the Core Financial Statements<br />
• Liquidity Risk – the possibility that the Council might not have the funds available to meet its payment<br />
commitments; and,<br />
• Market Risk – the possibility that a financial gain or loss might arise for the Council due to movements in<br />
interest rates, market prices, foreign currency exchange rates, etc. The Council’s investment in the<br />
CCLA is subject to the risk of falling commercial property prices. This risk is limited by the Council’s<br />
maximum exposure to property investments of £1.5m. A 5% fall in commercial property prices would<br />
result in a £75,000 charge to Other Comprehensive Income & Expenditure – this would have no impact<br />
on the General Fund until the investment was sold.<br />
Credit Risk<br />
The Council has adopted CIPFA’s Code of Practice on Treasury Management (and subsequent amendments),<br />
and complies with the Prudential Code for Capital Finance in Local Authorities.<br />
Credit risk arises from deposits with banks and financial institutions (counterparties), as well as credit exposure to<br />
the Council’s customers. The Council protects the security of the cash it deposits with counterparties using a<br />
number of risk management techniques. Principal among these is the evaluation of counterparty risk, which uses<br />
a combination of credit ratings and limits on the term and maximum value of any deposits.<br />
The Council seeks to reduce counterparty risk by adjusting the maximum amounts that may be invested with<br />
institutions. The details can be found in the Council’s Treasury Management Strategy.<br />
The table below summarises the Council’s investment portfolio at 31 March 2016. All investments made were in<br />
line with the Council’s approved credit rating criteria at the time of placing the investment, and still met those<br />
criteria at 31 March 2016.<br />
Table 5<br />
Counterparty<br />
(MMF = Money Market Funds)<br />
Long-<br />
Term<br />
Rating<br />
Balance Invested at 31 March 2016 £’000<br />
Up to Greater than 1 Greater<br />
1 month and up than 3<br />
month to 3 months months Total<br />
59<br />
Balance<br />
Invested at<br />
31 March 2015<br />
£’000<br />
Svenska Handelsbanken* Aa2 3,000 3,000 3,000<br />
Santander Bank* A1 3,000 3,000 3,000<br />
Barclays Bank A2 0 3,000<br />
Lloyds Bank A1 0 3,000<br />
Standard Chartered Bank A1 3,000 3,000 3,000<br />
Nationwide Building Society A1 0 3,000<br />
HSBC Bank Aa2 3,000 3,000 0<br />
Debt Management Office (T-Bills) 5,989 5,989 0<br />
Leeds Building Society A2 0 1,000<br />
Close Brothers Aa3 1,000 1,000 0<br />
BNP Paribas MMF* Aaa-mf 3,000 3,000 1,500<br />
Goldman Sachs MMF* Aaa-mf 0 1,500<br />
Morgan Stanley MMF* Aaa-mf 376 376 300<br />
Black Rock MMF* Aaa-mf 3,000 3,000 0<br />
CCLA Property Fund 1,504 1,504 1,418<br />
Total 24,365 1,000 1,504 26,869 23,718<br />
*These investments are cash and cash equivalents in the Balance Sheet. The rest are short-term investments,<br />
except for the CCLA Property Fund investment.<br />
The ratings above are from Moody’s credit rating agency. The long-term rating is the benchmark measure of<br />
probability of default. The default based on the experience gathered over the last five financial years is nil and the<br />
default adjusted for current market conditions is nil. Therefore, the estimated maximum exposure to default is nil<br />
as at 31 March 2016 (nil as at 31 March 2015).<br />
A description of the grading is provided below: