06.03.2017 Views

TRUMP

anatomy

anatomy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

APPENDIX 313<br />

fact-checkers to a culture war.” 129 That’s true as an assessment of<br />

the problem, but the question is how Democrats intend to win that<br />

culture war. Do they intend to win it by trying to get people who<br />

already agree with them to half-heartedly drag themselves to the<br />

polls, and by portraying Trump’s working class constituency as the<br />

enemy? Or do they intend to win it by offering an actual principled<br />

contrast that deals with the real problems that people have?<br />

The selection of Tim Kaine as Clinton’s running mate is not a good<br />

sign here. Kaine has no potential whatsoever to craft the kind of<br />

inspiring alternative platform that Democrats need. Hillary Clinton<br />

has not just admitted Kaine is boring, but says that she “love[s] that<br />

about him” because he fits her “fondness for wonks.” 130 But wonks<br />

are precisely the problem; they are incapable of understanding<br />

voters’ emotions. Such people will puzzle over why Americans<br />

are “stubbornly negative” about the economy, 131 failing to even<br />

recognize that large parts of the country are characterized by massive<br />

inequality 132 and poverty. 133<br />

Kaine certainly doesn’t help with the Democrats’ need to reclaim a<br />

progressive populism, since he infamously tried to help banks evade<br />

consumer protection regulations. 134 Trump will (accurately) seize on<br />

this as a reflection of Democratic obliviousness. Indeed, just hours after<br />

the pick was announced, the Republican National Committee sent<br />

out a statement pointing out that “Kaine has castigated opponents<br />

of free-trade agreements as ‘losers’ and strongly supported the War in<br />

Iraq.” 135 By selecting Kaine, Clinton shows that she has no intention<br />

of trying to rechannel the working class anxiety fueling the Trump<br />

campaign into something positive. Instead, she’s simply hoping that<br />

people will be so afraid of Trump that they have no choice but to join<br />

her. Perhaps they will be. But consider: Trump tells people he will keep<br />

them safe from joblessness, terrorism, and crime. Clinton tells people<br />

that joblessness, terrorism, and crime aren’t problems, and that she’ll<br />

keep them safe from Trump. Which scare tactic is more compelling?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!