Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Analyzing Computational Models<br />
David A. Siegel, Duke University<br />
david.siegel@duke.edu<br />
Models-As-Fables: An Alternative to the<br />
Standard Rationale for Using Formal Models in<br />
Political Science<br />
James Johnson, University of Rochester<br />
jd.johnson@rochester.edu<br />
51-11 Modeling Over Time<br />
Fri at 3:00 pm<br />
3:00 Chair, Olga Chyzh, Iowa State University<br />
ochyzh@iastate.edu<br />
3:05 Equation Balance in Time Series Analysis: What<br />
it is and Why it Matters<br />
Paul M. Kellstedt, Texas A & M University-College<br />
Station<br />
kellstedt@tamu.edu<br />
Mark Pickup, Simon Fraser University<br />
mark.pickup@sfu.ca<br />
3:18 Causal Inference and Treatment Histories in<br />
Time-Series Cross-Sectional Data<br />
Matthew Blackwell, Harvard University<br />
mblackwell@gov.harvard.edu<br />
Adam Nathaniel Glynn*, Emory University<br />
adam.glynn@emory.edu<br />
3:31 Endogenous Hidden Markov Models<br />
Kentaro Hirose, Waseda University<br />
khirose@aoni.waseda.jp<br />
3:44 Selection Bias in Event Data<br />
Scott Jeffrey Cook, Texas A & M University-<br />
College Station<br />
sjcook@tamu.edu<br />
3:57 Disc., Olga Chyzh, Iowa State University<br />
ochyzh@iastate.edu<br />
4:10 Audience Discussion<br />
52-9 Lobbying Congress<br />
Fri at 3:00 pm<br />
3:00 Chair, Kris Miler, University of Maryland-College<br />
Park<br />
kmiler@umd.edu<br />
3:05 Direct and Indirect Effects of Female Lobbyists<br />
Scott Ainsworth*, University of Georgia<br />
sainswor@uga.edu<br />
3:15 Hearing Our Voices: The Presence of Minority<br />
Interest Groups in Congressional Hearings<br />
Maraam A. Dwidar, University of Texas-Austin<br />
mdwidar@utexas.edu<br />
Eric L. McDaniel, The University of Texas at Austin<br />
emcdaniel@austin.utexas.edu<br />
3:26 Rhetoric and Contributions on a Committee<br />
Level: A Bayesian Dynamic Model<br />
Iliyan Iliev, University of Southern Mississippi<br />
iliyan.r.iliev@gmail.com<br />
3:37 The Influence of Lobbying and Campaign<br />
Contributions on Federal Procurement<br />
Thomas T. Holyoke, California State University-<br />
Fresno<br />
tholyoke@csufresno.edu<br />
Aaron Dusso, Indiana University-Purdue University-<br />
Indianapolis<br />
adusso@iupui.edu<br />
Henrik M. Schatzinger, Ripon College<br />
schatzingerh@ripon.edu<br />
3:48 The Inverse Pull of Lobbying Influence and<br />
Legislator Power<br />
Amy Melissa McKay, University of Exeter<br />
A.McKay@Exeter.ac.uk<br />
Michael C. Munger*, Duke University<br />
munger@duke.edu<br />
3:59 Disc., Michael S. Kowal, Bowdoin College<br />
mkowal@bowdoin.edu<br />
4:10 Audience Discussion<br />
53-9 Separation of Powers and the Administrative<br />
State<br />
Fri at 3:00 pm<br />
3:00 Chair, Rachel Augustine Potter, University of<br />
Virginia-Main Campus<br />
rapotter@virginia.edu<br />
3:05 Off-site Oversight: Congressional Dominance and<br />
Agency Accountability<br />
Kenneth Scott Lowande, Washington University in<br />
St. Louis<br />
lowande@wustl.edu<br />
3:15 Lobbying the Courts Through Comments<br />
Miranda Elyse Yaver*, Yale University<br />
miranda.yaver@yale.edu<br />
Steven Rashin, New York University<br />
srashin@gmail.com<br />
3:26 Presidential Preferences and Bureaucratic<br />
Performance: Fair Housing Enforcement at the<br />
Justice Department<br />
Charles M. Lamb, SUNY Buffalo State<br />
clamb@buffalo.edu<br />
Collin Anderson, University at Buffalo<br />
collinan@buffalo.edu<br />
Daniel Myers, University at Buffalo<br />
danielmy@buffalo.edu<br />
Eric Wilk*, Georgia Gwinnett College<br />
ewilk@ggc.edu<br />
3:37 When Do Executive Agencies Comply?: Congress,<br />
Statutory Deadlines and the Bureaucratic<br />
Response<br />
Kathleen Doherty, University of Southern<br />
California<br />
kdoherty@price.usc.edu<br />
Anthony Michael Bertelli, New York University<br />
tony.bertelli@nyu.edu<br />
260
Change language