12.12.2012 Views

Handbook of Functionalized Organometallics Applications in S

Handbook of Functionalized Organometallics Applications in S

Handbook of Functionalized Organometallics Applications in S

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

( +<br />

- )<br />

14.3 Unsymmetrically Placed Substituents <strong>in</strong> Stoichiometric Electrophilic Multihapto-Complexes<br />

Me<br />

Ph<br />

Fe(CO) 3<br />

1) LiCMe 2CN,<br />

2) CO, then MeI, 87%<br />

CMe 2CN<br />

48 Ref. 204<br />

( +<br />

-)<br />

Fe(CO) 3<br />

( +<br />

-)<br />

+<br />

Fe(CO)2P(OPh)3<br />

50<br />

Scheme 14.19<br />

1) LiSiMe 2Ph, THF, 0 ºC,<br />

then 25 ºC, 20 h,<br />

2) F 3CCO 2H, 0 ºC,<br />

then 25 ºC, 1 h, 41%<br />

LiCCPh,<br />

Ref. 235<br />

THF, -78 ºC - rt, 1 h, 59%<br />

Ref. 236<br />

Me<br />

O<br />

SiMe 2Ph<br />

Ph<br />

( +<br />

-)<br />

Fe(CO) 2P(OPh) 3<br />

Ph<br />

49<br />

( +<br />

-)<br />

central atom <strong>of</strong> the allyl ligand, produc<strong>in</strong>g two metal±carbon r bonds [216±218],<br />

and with neutral stoichiometric g 3 allyl complexes, this seems to be quite a common<br />

outcome [219]. Catalytic substitution <strong>of</strong> Cl from the center <strong>of</strong> an allyl ligand<br />

has been reported us<strong>in</strong>g cationic plat<strong>in</strong>um complexes [220]. Cationic g 3 allyl complexes<br />

<strong>of</strong> Ir(C5Me5)(PMe3) + [221], Rh(C5Me5)(PMe3) + + +<br />

[221], MoCp2 [222], WCp2<br />

[222] are also known to react with nucleophiles at the central carbon atom.<br />

Cycloheptadienyliron complexes also frequently show examples <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternal<br />

nucleophile addition [214,215,224±227]. Steric effects are conventionally cited to<br />

expla<strong>in</strong> the tendency <strong>of</strong> cycloheptadienyl complexes to give <strong>in</strong>ternal addition products<br />

(whereas cyclohexadienyl complexes react at the term<strong>in</strong>i). There is k<strong>in</strong>etic evidence<br />

to support this, as cycloheptadienyl complexes have been shown to be less<br />

reactive than cyclohexadienyl complexes [223]. The CH2 <strong>of</strong> the cyclohexadienyl<br />

complexes, and the CH2CH2 <strong>of</strong> the cyclohepadienyl complexes fold out away from<br />

the metal <strong>in</strong> these structures, and <strong>in</strong> the cycloheptadienyl case, each CH2 blocks a<br />

term<strong>in</strong>us <strong>of</strong> the p system. Nucleophilic attack is displaced to the <strong>in</strong>ternal positions,<br />

form<strong>in</strong>g g 1 ,g 3 products <strong>in</strong> competition with the g 4 products from the normal<br />

addition pathway [214,215,224±230]. With larger metals [Ru(CO) 3 and Os(CO) 3],<br />

this effect becomes more pronounced, and the g 1 ,g 3 products can predom<strong>in</strong>ate<br />

[230,231]. The nature <strong>of</strong> the nucleophile can also <strong>in</strong>fluence the preferred pathway<br />

(see Section 14.4). With ªs<strong>of</strong>tº nucleophiles, cycloheptadienyl complexes show the<br />

term<strong>in</strong>al addition pathway, while hard nucleophiles add <strong>in</strong>ternally [232]. Further<br />

593

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!