16.05.2017 Views

The Accountant-May-June 2017

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Business Practice and Development<br />

It is common knowledge that, SACCOs operate on principles<br />

of cooperation, voluntary and open membership, democratic<br />

member control, member economic participation, autonomy and<br />

independence, education, training etc. it’s from these principles<br />

that the governance of the cooperative movement is derived.<br />

loan facility from a SACCO, he is required<br />

to present a security or collateral. In nearly<br />

all known SACCOs, this collateral will<br />

constitute the employees monthly salary,<br />

terminal dues and any other employment<br />

benefits that might accrue to him in the<br />

future. Of course for as long as the loan<br />

remains outstanding. However, these<br />

kinds of collateral are not considered<br />

sufficient on their own. <strong>The</strong> applicant<br />

(loan) has to get a number of guarantors in<br />

addition to the aforementioned securities.<br />

This act is the best way to ensure the<br />

SACCO doesn’t lose money. Definitely<br />

the SACCO management has it easy<br />

but not so, the guarantors and especially<br />

if the loan applicant defaults payment.<br />

Some SACCOs will attach the salaries of<br />

the guarantors and recover the defaulted<br />

amount overtime. Of course a huge<br />

burden to the guarantors considering that<br />

they are paying an amount they didn’t<br />

borrow or even consume. Another way of<br />

recovering the same amount (defaulted) is<br />

by reducing the deposits Account of the<br />

guarantor by his/her share of defaulted<br />

amount. This is equally a huge burden<br />

on the part of the guarantors. Well as to<br />

which method is the best the jury is still<br />

out. However, we may try to analyze the<br />

second method to be able to quantify the<br />

impact.<br />

Illustrative problem:<br />

A, took a loan of 500,000 payable in 36<br />

months at an interest rate of 14% per<br />

annum on a reducing balance method.<br />

He was guaranteed by 5 members of his<br />

SACCO (XY SACCO LTD). B was one<br />

of the guarantors to A’s loan. B has over<br />

the years taken loans and repaid and has<br />

saved a considerable amount (300,000),<br />

at least by the time A defaulted on the<br />

loan. When A defaulted on his loan, he<br />

had only paid up 8 months equivalent<br />

of monthly installments. On his part A<br />

had a total of ksh. 200,000 in deposits.<br />

A member is entitled to a loan amount<br />

equivalent to 3 times his/her Deposits<br />

Account.<br />

What will be the burden to B<br />

from default of A’s loan<br />

For easy of calculation we assume the<br />

total interest payable by A is 150,000 by<br />

the end of the loan duration. <strong>The</strong>refore<br />

total loan burden = Principal Amount +<br />

Interest; 500,000 + 150,000= Ksh650,000.<br />

<strong>The</strong> monthly installments would amount<br />

to 650,000/36 = 18,056 per month<br />

When A defaulted, he had done 8<br />

months worth of installments = 18056 *<br />

8 = Ksh144,444<br />

Balance = 650,000- 144,444 = 505,556<br />

Guarantors burden = Defaulted amount<br />

– A’s Deposits Account = 505,556 –<br />

200,000= Ksh. 305,556<br />

Individual Guarantors Burden =<br />

305,556/5 =Ksh. 61,111<br />

B will reduce his Deposit Account by<br />

Ksh.61, 111 which means<br />

Deposit Account after default = 300,000<br />

MAY - JUNE <strong>2017</strong> 9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!