09.06.2017 Views

APSMER2017 PROCEEDINGS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Proceedings of the 11th Asia-Pacific Symposium for Music Education Research<br />

(APSMER 2017) 19th to 21st July 2017, Melaka MALAYSIA<br />

proposed expression. They felt insecure and the obtained expression was<br />

gradually diminished in each recording.<br />

On the other hand, the players experienced an assent and easiness<br />

when they realized the effect of the teacher’s direction.<br />

Aya: I thought that he was pushing the tempo while he was conducting,<br />

but it encouraged me to exceed my limit.<br />

Seiko: I thought that I felt more unreserved to play the music with his<br />

conducting, too. It was the most cohesive performance in this<br />

session, I suppose.<br />

In the recording right after the scene, the players made a drastic<br />

change of musical expression in not only tempo, but also in dynamics and<br />

articulations.<br />

Discussion<br />

Firstly, none of the three teachers brought definitely predetermined plans of<br />

musical expression as their goal (Karlsson & Juslin 2008). The teachers’<br />

words “Ichigo-Ichie” shows that they evidently recognized the importance to<br />

generate musical expression in a reciprocal process with the players on site.<br />

To prepare for the reciprocal instruction, they gave the players several<br />

question to discern their primary ideas and understanding of the music.<br />

Secondly, not only teachers but also players collaboratively made<br />

decisions of musical expression. The teachers rarely gave concrete<br />

propositions about changes of tempo and dynamics. Instead, they mainly<br />

facilitated the players to generate and reframe their own ideas of musical<br />

expression by inspiring their imagination with intentionally ambiguous<br />

words. These tactics contributed new perspectives for the players to evoke<br />

another way of expression that they had never thought. The teachers accepted,<br />

impelled and sometimes inhibited the players’ new idea as feedback. In the<br />

last phase of their session, the teachers requested players to listen to each<br />

other’s sounds to make a coherent expression of the music by consolidating<br />

individual musical ideas. These structures of the sessions were very similar<br />

to the improvisational process that Fournier (2011) described the<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!