13.12.2012 Views

MMM Classics Year 10: MMM #s 91-100 - Moon Society

MMM Classics Year 10: MMM #s 91-100 - Moon Society

MMM Classics Year 10: MMM #s 91-100 - Moon Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ment/construction schedule would be useful on planetary<br />

surfaces as well. For instance, if a small robotic/remote<br />

control digger/hauler were at work now, how ready could it<br />

have an area on the <strong>Moon</strong> for an oasis in ten or fifteen<br />

years? And if every year or two another robot some with<br />

similar some with other capabilities were also sent then how<br />

far along could an oasis be when it finally became feasible to<br />

send humans? And as construction progressed there would<br />

be greater and greater incentive to send humans and less<br />

and less of an infrastructure hurdle to overcome.<br />

Richard Richardson<br />

< Rrrspace@aol.com><br />

Doering, Alaska<br />

EDITOR’S REPLY: While a sphere can be imagined as a combination<br />

of radial segments, and perhaps, on Earth where there is<br />

no differential between inside and outside pressure, such<br />

segments could be built one at a time. But not in space, at least<br />

not if you are going to pressurize them. Pressure wants to make<br />

everything round! PK.<br />

Triple Helix Space Colony seems ungainly<br />

[<strong>MMM</strong> # 87 JUL ‘95 “Space Oases, Part IV”, p. 8]<br />

Nature doesn’t use the triple helix very much.<br />

Myoglobin molecules, which somewhat resemble triple<br />

helices are crosss-braced. Even Watson and Crick’s abortive<br />

initial attempt at modeling DNA as a triple helix had an<br />

internal backbone holding everything together. It’s a rather<br />

ungainly structure.<br />

Jeff Sanburg,<br />

Skokie, Illinois<br />

EDITOR’S REPLY: Just as the torus space colony has a hub, the<br />

helix, double or single has a hub-shaft. And just as the torus<br />

has supporting spokes connecting it concentrically to the hub,<br />

so will the helix, double or triple, have rhythmically spaced<br />

spokes to the central shaft. I was incapable of illustrating this<br />

structural feature in my crude MacPaint graphics program and<br />

hoped that the reader would assume it.<br />

Whether nature uses the triple helix or not is immaterial.<br />

The design is structurally stable from an engineering<br />

point of view, and if growth from all three end points is kept<br />

apace, dynamic equilibrium will be maintained. Nature does<br />

use the radial plan (starfish, octopus, flowers, etc.) and the<br />

triple helix can be seen as a radial derivative. — PK<br />

Dust Control, Space Suits, Terrestrial Uses<br />

11/02/’95. “Dust Control” [<strong>MMM</strong> #89, pp. 5-7] was<br />

an excellent article. There is a way that we could get some<br />

of this hardware developed prior to returning to the <strong>Moon</strong>.<br />

The universal door-lock and the turtle-back suit would<br />

appear to have real application in the area of radioactive<br />

waste management and other hazardous environments. The<br />

concepts of keeping the nasties out, shielding, and working<br />

at a positive pressure with respect to your environment are<br />

common to both the radioactive waste problem and the<br />

<strong>Moon</strong>.<br />

It is becoming increasingly clear that there is an<br />

enormous clean up effort that must be done in the wake of<br />

weapons production and nuclear power generation both in<br />

this country and elsewhere. If we could steer some of the<br />

design concepts in this area, the result would be<br />

technologies highly adaptable to the <strong>Moon</strong>.<br />

David Graham < Woollym@aol.com ><br />

Woolly Mammoth Co./ECS<br />

EDITOR’S REPLY: Your suggestion is a great example of what<br />

I’ve dubbed "spin-up", pre-developing a technology that will<br />

be needed eventually on the space frontier, now, here on Earth<br />

for for-profit Earthly applications. Relatively free technology,<br />

ready to go or apply, when we need it in spaceis theend result.<br />

Shielding with Bricks? [posted to artemis-list]<br />

11/19/’95 With walls made of bricks or sandbags of lunar<br />

soil, and a roof made of supporting more lunar<br />

soil, we can provide the same protec-tion and still have<br />

access to the exterior surface of the habitat.<br />

Some questions: How quickly does the habitat need<br />

to be shielded? Does it have to be accomplished during the<br />

initial manned mission or can it be done telerobotically after<br />

the first team leaves?<br />

As far as brickmaking is concerned, do we know how<br />

to make bricks at the <strong>Moon</strong>base using equipment that will fit<br />

into the first mission's mass budget? I thought brickmaking<br />

would involve producing a glass base product, melting it<br />

and using it as a bonding agent in the bricks. Is there<br />

another way? Maybe using the regolith's natural clinging<br />

properties and a gas operated pressurized ram mold?<br />

Similar concerns for "sandbagging" lunar soil.<br />

Several hundred lightweight plastic and fiber reinforced<br />

plastic bags wouldn't weigh that much. But it would<br />

probably take a little time to fill them up by hand. The<br />

process could be automated but that means the machinery<br />

would have to be there to do it. Maybe a simple frame<br />

holding an electric vibrating hopper with a bag changer/endclosure<br />

device at the outfeed. Still have to have some sort<br />

of lunar earth mover to keep adding material to the hopper<br />

as well as a mechanism to remove and stack the bags as they<br />

are completed. Sounds like a system that would work best<br />

if there were people around to clear any malfunctions.<br />

Supervising it might be a full time job.<br />

Simply piling dirt on top of the compound with a<br />

teleoperated scooper may be the best way to go at first.<br />

Although taking a brickmaking outfit and setting up business<br />

might do a lot to make people understand that we are<br />

serious about building a full fledged moonbase and that we<br />

are there to stay. You don't start a brick factory if you<br />

aren't serious about construction!<br />

If it's essential to have external access to the<br />

first habitat then I suppose an aluminum frame could be set<br />

up like a spindly greenhouse (without the glazing) covering<br />

<strong>Moon</strong> Miners’ Manifesto <strong>Classics</strong> - <strong>Year</strong> <strong>10</strong> - Republished January 2006 - Page 13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!