13.12.2012 Views

MMM Classics Year 10: MMM #s 91-100 - Moon Society

MMM Classics Year 10: MMM #s 91-100 - Moon Society

MMM Classics Year 10: MMM #s 91-100 - Moon Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

primage, a solar concentrator able to produce various levels of<br />

heat, various handy molds, some of them refractory (able to<br />

withstand high heat), and sieving and compacting devices.<br />

We’ll also want a lab capable of testing performance characteristics,<br />

and a shop with in which we can “work” these initial<br />

crude materials, and “fabricate” them into useful items: building<br />

blocks and bricks, paving slabs, bins and other containers,<br />

tankage, additional molds, support “tables” for additional<br />

imported equipment, etc. As soon as feasible, we will want<br />

equipment that will let us tinker with sintered and cast iron and<br />

crude glass products.<br />

Yes, we want to set out a ready-to-go-just plug-in<br />

oxygen extraction pilot/demonstration module. But if we come<br />

truly committed from the outset to a permanent industrial<br />

presence, then the oxygen trick, taken alone, buys us little.<br />

Oxygen is important enough to share top priority status.<br />

Delivered back to LEO for refueling <strong>Moon</strong>bound ferries, it will<br />

lower the cost of importing additional equipment to the <strong>Moon</strong>.<br />

But every needed piece of low performance equipment that can<br />

be made on the <strong>Moon</strong> in a simple starter industry also cuts<br />

down import costs, even more directly, by cutting down<br />

appreciably the total accumulative weight of equipment<br />

needing to be imported. We need this two-pronged approach.<br />

To scorn it, as unworthy of attention, would be, to put it<br />

honestly, just plain fatally stupid.<br />

Beyond that, we must always keep in mind, that anything<br />

the outpost can make for itself, however crude - as long<br />

as it is serviceable, is a potential export to other space locations<br />

at a decided cost-advantage over unnecessarily refined alternatives<br />

made within, and shipped out of Earth’s deep gravity well.<br />

This should be the guiding philosophy of lunar industrial<br />

diversification aimed at a healthy diversified export trade.<br />

A companion stratagem that will “set us up” better yet<br />

is to especially fabricate all equipment that does, and must<br />

initially, come up from Earth so that those components which<br />

can eventually be replaced by serviceable <strong>Moon</strong>-made parts are<br />

made of elements not easily or economically produced on the<br />

<strong>Moon</strong>, at least not in the near future, but which will be essential<br />

for a healthy diversified industrial operation. For example,<br />

tables, tanks, bins, dividers, separators, containers and other<br />

packaging materials etc. should be made of strategic cannibalizable<br />

materials such as copper, brass, stainless steel, aluminum<br />

alloy, easily reusable simple polymers like polyethylene and<br />

polyurethane, etc. [cf. <strong>MMM</strong> # 65 MAY ‘93 pp. 7-8, “MUS/cle<br />

Substitutions” and “Stowaway Imports” - <strong>MMM</strong> <strong>Classics</strong> #7]<br />

While such “special” manufacturing specifications<br />

may make the import item initially more expensive in itself,<br />

and perhaps even heavier and therefore more fuel-costly to<br />

import, the subsequent advantage to infant lunar industry may<br />

very well outweigh these upfront penalties. If we are indeed in<br />

this for the long haul, then long term goals must be given<br />

priority over short-term budgeting myopia.<br />

To insure that this is the plan we will indeed follow, it<br />

is absolutely essential that we first sell ourselves, then others<br />

whose support we will need, on the whole “ladder” of a lunar<br />

industrial settlement, and not just one innocuous unalarming<br />

“rung” at a time. The rung-by-rung sales pitch now in vogue<br />

among space-activists is perhaps the single most responsible<br />

fatal flaw behind our current going-nowhere space efforts.<br />

by Peter Kokh<br />

The provident architect, in designing a building - be it<br />

a residence, a factory, a school, an office, or a corporate headquarters<br />

- will take into consideration the possible downrange<br />

need to expand. For if the tenant of the premises prospers, the<br />

structured interior space of the original construction may soon<br />

be outgrown. If no provision has been made for easy and<br />

orderly expansion, the original site may have to be abandoned,<br />

and a new facility built on adjoining or distant property.<br />

Much like the would-be architect using Lincoln Logs<br />

or Lego blocks, and even more like the think-ahead Scrabble<br />

player, the architect of the original lunar outpost will want to<br />

leave a number of opportunities for expansion. His grounded<br />

options must provide for changing needs in a flexible way.<br />

“Expand EZ” features will mean minimum disruption and<br />

disturbance of, and other inconvenience to, ongoing operations<br />

This is the philosophy behind using multi-port nodes<br />

as airlock modules, for example. We don’t have to give up a<br />

point of access to expand. Spacing of such expansion/access<br />

nodes must also be considered. The module or other pressurized<br />

space to be added may or may not be of comparable size<br />

to the starter module or modules. If connecting ports are<br />

arranged at angles to one another, as for example in a cross-T,<br />

hex, octagonal or other radial pattern, this provides more sizing<br />

flexibility than does an initial configuration with expansion<br />

ports arrayed side by side.<br />

Expansion ports should be indifferent to the nature of<br />

the added space: hard-hulled payload bay sized modules<br />

brought up from Earth; “telescoping” or otherwise unfolding<br />

hard-hull modules which allow more usable volume; or inflatable<br />

structures. Of these, the cylinder can offer the same or<br />

greater volume than the sphere for the same or lower height.<br />

And the torus offers a more stable footprint as well as room for<br />

built-in features in its “donut-hole” [cf. <strong>MMM</strong> # 50, NOV ‘<strong>91</strong>,<br />

pp. 6-8 “Hostels: Lowering the Threshold to Lunar Occupancy:<br />

Part IV, Hostel-Appropriate Architectures” - <strong>MMM</strong> C #5]<br />

We have recently touched on another topic which will<br />

greatly affect the ease or difficulty of outpost expansion: the<br />

manner in which we apply shielding mass made of regolith. If<br />

we apply it directly, a certain amount of tedious, gingerly<br />

delicate, and messy excavation may be necessary to expose the<br />

expansion point decided upon. If we apply our shielding<br />

indirectly, as in a hangar shed arch roof over the outpost site,<br />

then this shielding will not be in our way when we need to<br />

expand, and, as a bonus, the workers affecting the expansion<br />

can work in a safer, radiation and micrometeorite free “lee”<br />

vacuum under the hangar shed.<br />

The layout of the site must also be considered, and we<br />

won’t want to pick a site that unduly constricts opportunities<br />

for expansion with too close scenic but in-the-way features like<br />

crater walls, rille shoulders, scarps, etc.<br />

Expansion for what?<br />

We will want to expand our outpost in a timely<br />

fashion to provide together both more living space and more<br />

operations space. In expanded living space will be additional<br />

<strong>Moon</strong> Miners’ Manifesto <strong>Classics</strong> - <strong>Year</strong> <strong>10</strong> - Republished January 2006 - Page 4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!