MBR JULY ALL
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Malta Business Review<br />
DENTAL HEALTHCARE<br />
Malta Business Review<br />
ADDRESSING COMPLEX<br />
CASE SCENARIOS!<br />
By Dr Jean Paul Demajo<br />
In today’s dentistry aesthetics are as<br />
important as functionality. Many patients visit<br />
the dentist and tell them how happy they are<br />
that their bridge or implant they had done<br />
many years ago is still doing fine. What they<br />
are unhappy about are the poor aesthetics<br />
they carry. Most of this old dental work is<br />
heavily constructed using old techniques<br />
with possible visible metal. The frontal view<br />
often shows receeded darkened gums by the<br />
thin metal-ceramic edge of the border of the<br />
crown. Spaces appear in between the teeth<br />
and/or implants, again due to gum recession<br />
causing dark shadows and food packing.<br />
Food packing leads to plaque build-up and<br />
inflammation. Yes this may be kept clean but<br />
the aesthetics still leave much to be desired.<br />
The fact remains that in most cases a bridge<br />
or implant looks very good when inserted but<br />
10, 15 or 20years later it looks very poor and<br />
not in-keeping with the rest of the dentition.<br />
OPTIONS FOR TREATMENT<br />
1 Removal of the implant and adjacent tooth<br />
with poor prognosis followed by two new<br />
implants replacing the two missing teeth<br />
and two new crowns<br />
2 Modification of metal collar and provision<br />
of new implant crown<br />
3 Removal of implant and construction of<br />
new all-ceramic bridge in zirconia or lithium<br />
di-silicate replacing both teeth<br />
4 Gingival plastic surgery to cover the metal<br />
collar<br />
This is a tricky case scenario on a patient<br />
with high expectations. Each option<br />
carries advantages and disadvantages.<br />
Understanding that each option may bare a<br />
good but possibly a compromised result, the<br />
patient has opted for option 1. Here is the<br />
sequence of events:<br />
1 Explantation (removal of implant) and<br />
extraction of adjacent central incisor<br />
2 Simultaneous bone and gingival grafting<br />
plus provision of removable prosthesis.<br />
3 Placement of 2 new implants 3months<br />
post-removal of implant and tooth with<br />
further bone augmentation<br />
4 Fitting of new all ceramic intermediate<br />
implant-crown connections followed by<br />
a metal free all-ceramic superstructure<br />
4months post-implantation<br />
Intra-op pre treatment<br />
Intra-op showing two implants and two ceramic connections<br />
The above shows that there are many<br />
solutions to an aesthetic problem. What’s<br />
important is knowing what options are out<br />
there, explaining them to the patient and<br />
selecting the best option to address the<br />
patients wishes. Timeframes and costings<br />
must also be weighed out.<br />
Ask your dentist! <strong>MBR</strong><br />
A CASE SCENARIO<br />
Middle aged man is unhappy<br />
with an implant done<br />
12 years ago<br />
The implant has healed very well<br />
Fully satisfied with performance<br />
of implant but deeply unsatisfied<br />
with current aesthetics<br />
of tooth and gum<br />
Extra-op pre treatment<br />
Extra-op post treatment<br />
DR JEAN PAUL DEMAJO<br />
Dental and Implant Surgeon,<br />
Trained in London working in<br />
private practice in Malta<br />
42 43<br />
www.maltabusinessreview.net