14.12.2012 Views

Key Issues Report of the Porirua City Council - Environmental ...

Key Issues Report of the Porirua City Council - Environmental ...

Key Issues Report of the Porirua City Council - Environmental ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Permitted Baseline<br />

6.5 Provision is made for network utilities that existed at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> notification <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>Porirua</strong> <strong>City</strong> are provided for as a Permitted Activity (Rule D4.1.1(ii)) in <strong>the</strong><br />

Rural Zone and prior to 22 September 2007 in <strong>the</strong> Public Open Space Zone<br />

(Rule DC.1.1(xii)). Irrespective to when <strong>the</strong> existing transmission lines that are<br />

<strong>the</strong> subject <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Transpower application were established, <strong>the</strong> rules in <strong>the</strong><br />

Resource Management (National <strong>Environmental</strong> Standards for Electricity<br />

Activities) Regulations 2009 (NESETA) supersede <strong>the</strong>se two rules. For this<br />

reason it is considered that it is <strong>the</strong> NESETA that sets <strong>the</strong> 'permitted baseline'<br />

ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> District Plan in relation to existing transmission lines.<br />

6.6 Regulation 14 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> NESETA provides for <strong>the</strong> relocation <strong>of</strong> Transmission Line<br />

towers subject to compliance with identified sub-clauses. These provisions are<br />

summarised in Section 4.2.2 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> assessment <strong>of</strong> environmental effects<br />

accompanying <strong>the</strong> Transpower application. It is considered that <strong>the</strong> parameters<br />

set out in <strong>the</strong> NESETA for permitted activities establish <strong>the</strong> permitted baseline<br />

<strong>of</strong> environmental effects that may occur in relation to <strong>the</strong> relocation <strong>of</strong><br />

transmission towers. It is acknowledged that <strong>the</strong> NESETA only applies to<br />

existing transmission lines.<br />

6.7 No provision is made for new network utilities outside <strong>of</strong> a road as a Permitted<br />

Activities in ei<strong>the</strong>r Zone in <strong>the</strong> District Plan. Those network utilities located<br />

within a Rural zoned road that include lines conveying electricity up to and<br />

including 110kV are permitted where <strong>the</strong> support structure does not exceed 10<br />

metres in height or 2 metres in diameter. New aboveground lines for conveying<br />

electricity at a voltage above 110kV, or with a design capacity above 100MVA<br />

per circuit in <strong>the</strong> Rural Zone are not provided for as a Permitted Activity by <strong>the</strong><br />

District Plan. Likewise, new above-ground lines for conveying electricity at a<br />

voltage above 110kV are not provided as a Permitted Activity in <strong>the</strong> Public<br />

Open Space Zone.<br />

6.8 It is not considered that <strong>the</strong>re are any activities permitted in <strong>the</strong> Rural or Open<br />

Space Zones by <strong>the</strong> District Plan that are <strong>of</strong> a comparative nature to <strong>the</strong><br />

proposed transmission line relocation. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, it is considered that any<br />

activities involving establishment <strong>of</strong> new transmission lines provided for as a<br />

Permitted Activity by <strong>the</strong> District Plan are <strong>of</strong> a relatively modest nature due to<br />

<strong>the</strong> limitation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> scale <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> associated support structures compared to <strong>the</strong><br />

scale <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> effects associated with <strong>the</strong> proposed relocation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> transmission<br />

line.<br />

6.9 It is <strong>the</strong>refore considered that it is only <strong>the</strong> effects permitted by <strong>the</strong> NESETA<br />

which are relevant in determining <strong>the</strong> 'permitted baseline'. No comparison has<br />

been sought by <strong>the</strong> EPA for a comparison <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> proposed<br />

transmission line relocation with <strong>the</strong> 'permitted baseline' <strong>of</strong> effects.<br />

Existing Resource Consents on Subject Land<br />

6.10 The properties that are <strong>the</strong> subject <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> application for resource consent are<br />

identified in <strong>the</strong> From 9 attaching to <strong>the</strong> Transpower application 34 . A search <strong>of</strong><br />

34 Contained in Volume 6: Transmission Line Relocation Project<br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!