02.02.2018 Views

LSB February 2018_Web_LSSA

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TOP ELECTION ISSUE<br />

KEY ASKS<br />

• A commitment to an audit of all South<br />

Australian legislation and regulation that<br />

impacts on businesses as to continuing<br />

relevance and to simplify and reduce<br />

the regulatory burden.<br />

• Policy makers contemplating<br />

introduction or changes to major<br />

aspects of regulation must consult in<br />

a genuine and timely way with affected<br />

businesses, community organisations<br />

and individuals.<br />

8. PROTECTION OF ESSENTIAL STATE<br />

SERVICES<br />

PRIVATISATION OF THE LAND SERVICES<br />

GROUP<br />

The issue: The privatisation of services<br />

of the Lands Titles Office (LTO)<br />

was conducted without appropriate<br />

consultation. There has been a lack of<br />

transparency by the Government as to the<br />

terms and conditions of the contract the<br />

Government is entering into with Land<br />

Services SA, particularly regarding issues<br />

of privacy and the protection of personal<br />

data. South Australians have a right to<br />

know how data relating to their property<br />

ownership and transactions will be used<br />

and how it is to be protected.<br />

KEY ASKS<br />

• That the terms of and conditions of the<br />

Contract the Government is entering<br />

into with Land Services SA be publicly<br />

disclosed.<br />

• That in any future sale of a State-owned<br />

asset or a service provided by the State:<br />

o the Government outline its proposal<br />

including the results of a cost/<br />

benefit and risk analysis, before<br />

proceeding to amend legislation<br />

or include projections in the State<br />

budget<br />

o if not otherwise required to<br />

be debated by the Parliament,<br />

Parliamentary approval be required for<br />

sales expected to exceed $50 million<br />

o the terms and conditions of the<br />

contract be transparent<br />

PRIVATISATION OF FINES UNIT<br />

The issue: The Law Society has serious<br />

concerns about the passage of a Bill<br />

that allows the Government to privatise<br />

the fines unit, which is responsible for<br />

recovering unpaid fines. Under the Bill,<br />

a Chief Recovery Officer is responsible<br />

for recovering civil debt owed to the<br />

Government, and the Government could<br />

outsource the Chief Recovery Officer<br />

role to a private debt collection agency, or<br />

privatise the function entirely. The Society<br />

strongly opposes the privatisation of the<br />

Government’s fines collection functions.<br />

KEY ASK<br />

• That the responsibility for the collection<br />

of Government fines remain a function<br />

of the Government.<br />

9. SMARTER CRIMINAL POLICIES<br />

The issue: A number of legislative<br />

changes have been introduced since the<br />

last State election which have expanded<br />

the power of the State and eroded civil<br />

liberties. Several of these laws seek to hand<br />

even more authority to the State, increasing<br />

the risk of people being unfairly oppressed<br />

and persecuted.<br />

They include:<br />

• The Criminal Law Consolidation<br />

(Criminal Organisations) Amendment<br />

Bill 2017<br />

• Statutes Amendment (Child Exploitation<br />

and Encrypted Material) Bill 2017<br />

• The Statutes Amendment (Terror<br />

Suspect Detention) Bill 2017<br />

People are being detained for long<br />

periods of time without access to lawyers<br />

or rights. There is a growing number of<br />

instances where the presumption of bail<br />

has been revoked.<br />

KEY ASKS<br />

• That the Government enact a charter<br />

of rights to ensure that State laws are<br />

compatible with a set of principles that<br />

protect and promote the basic freedoms,<br />

rights and responsibilities of all South<br />

Australians.<br />

• That there be genuine consultation<br />

with stakeholders such as the Law<br />

Society on proposed legislative changes<br />

before they are introduced into<br />

Parliament.<br />

• That an evidence-based rationale be<br />

provided of the merits of proposed<br />

laws that may infringe a person’s rights<br />

and freedoms.<br />

10. PRISONS<br />

The issue: South Australia’s prisons are<br />

chronically overcrowded, which impacts<br />

on the delivery of rehabilitation programs,<br />

the release of prisoners at the end of<br />

their parole period, the capacity to treat<br />

cognitively impaired prisoners, and the<br />

ability of lawyers to meet with their clients<br />

in prison.<br />

KEY ASKS<br />

• Sufficient allocation of funds to support<br />

the execution of the “10by20” strategy<br />

to reduce re-offending by 10% by 2020<br />

• Adoption of the Standard Minimum<br />

Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners<br />

(“the Nelson Mandela Rules”) as<br />

minimum standards for people held in<br />

prisons and other forms of custody.<br />

• The concerns of the Society in<br />

relation to the Correctional Services<br />

(Miscellaneous) Amendment Bill<br />

2017 be addressed. In particular, the<br />

removal from the Bill of the proposed<br />

deletion of section 22(3) of the<br />

Correctional Services Act 1982, which<br />

provides that person who is sentenced<br />

to a term of imprisonment exceeding<br />

15 days must not be imprisoned in a<br />

police prison. B<br />

<strong>February</strong> <strong>2018</strong> THE BULLETIN 19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!