LIGO_casebook

OTTO E. RÖSSLER
Does a “Fraudulent Joke” stand behind the Discovery of
Gravitational Waves?
Two hard reasons motivate this public question:
question.
First, the by now famous, almost identical pair of LIGO data
from September 14, 2015 got recorded four days before the
official start of measurements while the experiment was still
on trial runs. During that phase, fake “trial data” of similar
shapes got routinely injected at unpredictable times to remain
unacknowledged for months in a row for double-blind
purposes. This state of affairs likely extends to the data in
Second, the data are interpreted as a length change in the 4 kilometers long detector
arms, functionally enlarged by a factor of more than ten through back and forth
reflections. The measured length change then is less than one ten-thousandth of the
diameter of a proton – more than 24 orders of magnitude below the 4 kilometers of
the instrument. This unprecedented sensitivity means also that no physical effect has
ever been excluded to a higher accuracy! If the observed minute length change was
real, gravity waves would be a million times weaker than originally anticipated by
Joseph Weber whom I once met. Never has a tinier result been presented as a
discovery.
This unprecedented state of affairs makes it mandatory for the involved scientists to
publish a detailed account of the up until now neglected “forensic part” of the
experiment: by portraying every fake signal injected during the months and weeks
and days before September 18. Only thereafter can one return to the, in this light
prematurely published, claim of a gravitational wave detected.
This caveat is given by an author who for eight years offers an unchallenged,
meanwhile maximally simplified, published proof of global constancy of the speed
of light in the vacuum. This retrieved result of the less than 32 year old Einstein rules
out gravitational waves from first principles. It simultaneously confirms Einstein’s
own later abandonment of gravitational waves. The marvelously crafted “ring-down
effect” displayed in the LIGO data from September 14 in Physical Review Letters is
114