13.03.2018 Views

Sahiyo Communication Guide

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

‘Individual Responsibility’ Approach<br />

Some activists emphasize the idea that ending FGC is a matter of individual<br />

responsibility. They believe that a girl going through FGC is the fault of one<br />

person (the parent, for example), and if that person says no to FGC, then<br />

the practice cannot occur. When this approach is taken, the activist often<br />

ends up asking questions - or making assumptions - about what people<br />

could or should have done to ensure that the girl didn’t get cut (like calling<br />

the police, for example).<br />

The limitation of this approach is that activists tend to take a cognitive<br />

‘blindness’ to systemic factors that might lead to a girl getting cut. In<br />

other words, activists ignore the more universal reasons why people might<br />

continue FGC and tend to focus on blaming individuals. These other<br />

systemic reasons include FGC being promoted as a religious or cultural<br />

necessity, people raised with the belief that authority cannot be questioned,<br />

or fear of being disowned by the community. But even for a sympathetic<br />

activist, sometimes these systemic factors are harder to see and difficult to<br />

cognitively grapple with.<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!