24.04.2018 Views

Exberliner Issue 171 May 2018

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

DON’T WORK, MAKE MONEY<br />

with our democratic ideals, he just couldn’t cope and refused<br />

to continue his seminar. He retired soon after and died five<br />

months later. So in a way he was one of the victims of the<br />

whole movement. At one point my Doktormutter [doctoral<br />

supervisor] refused to speak to me for three months because<br />

I had voted along student lines and not with professors as a<br />

representative in the university governing body. Although I<br />

was her assistant! [Laughs]<br />

In <strong>May</strong> 1968 my wife and I were still in Berlin taking part in<br />

numerous demonstrations. However, that is the point when<br />

the Extra-parliamentary Opposition (APO) and the radicalisation<br />

began, which we thought was wrong. So we were happy<br />

to be able to get away to the States in August 1968. When<br />

I returned in 1970, everything had become very politicised.<br />

There were various factions competing against each other,<br />

fighting each other: the Albanian Maoists, the Trotskyists, the<br />

Chinese Maoists. In my view, it became more and more irrational.<br />

I increasingly distanced myself. It was endless fights<br />

among sectarian groups over leadership. In 1970, my professor<br />

told me she would offer me an assistantship. Then I got a<br />

telephone call: ‘This is Genosse [Comrade] Paul. We hear you<br />

are up for an assistantship. Would you be willing to present<br />

yourself to the student body?’ He invited me to a meeting on<br />

a Sunday night in a huge downtown Berlin apartment. It was<br />

arranged like a tribunal. There were four ‘comrades’ sitting<br />

in the front of the room. They interviewed the candidates for<br />

the research positions two at a time. The only question they<br />

were asked was, ‘In case of controversy between students<br />

and professors, who would you vote with?’ Of course both<br />

of them knew what they had to say. The first one said, ‘Of<br />

course with the students.’ But then he had second thoughts,<br />

and added something like, ‘Well, it would depend on the<br />

topic.’ That was the end of him. The other guy got the job.<br />

When I refused to take part in this tribunal, comrade Paul<br />

said ‘Then you’re not getting the job.’ [Luckily for Fluck it<br />

turned out his employment offer was connected to a special<br />

grant and was therefore exempt from the student veto over<br />

academic appointments. He could take up the job.]<br />

Looking back and despite the radical turn it later took, I<br />

believe that the student movement helped make the German<br />

university become a democratic place. Today’s students<br />

are still active in their own way: their political engagement<br />

has mostly shifted from class conflict to diversity issues.<br />

More importantly, the 1968 movement played a huge role in<br />

democratising Germany. When I grew up, Germany was still<br />

an authoritarian country in many ways. The next generation<br />

threw this overboard. I’d grown up as a German ashamed of<br />

Germany. When abroad and asked where I was from, I’d just<br />

say I was “European”. When I see the path of development<br />

Germany has since taken, I am mainly proud. — EJ<br />

From Marxist to feminist<br />

Frigga Haug<br />

Born in 1937, Haug had already been an active Marxist<br />

militant for years when the 1968 student movement broke<br />

in Berlin. Converted to feminism after she experienced the<br />

‘trap’ of motherhood in a small town near Cologne, she ran<br />

back to Berlin and would soon dedicate her energy to the<br />

socialist women’s movement. At 80, Haug is one of Germany’s<br />

foremost feminist intellectuals and regularly speaks<br />

at conferences.<br />

I was in the SDS [Socialist German Student<br />

League] and co-founded the Marxist<br />

magazine Das Argument in 1959 [she’s<br />

still an editor for the publication to this<br />

day]. We covered all the topics of the time, which also<br />

became the questions of the 1968 movement: sexuality,<br />

author-ity and family, education, Poland, the war in<br />

Algeria, fascism, antisemitism, etc. At first, we thought<br />

the 1968ers’ demeanour wasn’t genuine politics – it<br />

was more like a disruption. We were working on analyses<br />

of capitalist society, but more and more people<br />

started going to big assemblies where everyone yelled<br />

over each other and whoever had charisma could take<br />

over. We were completely overwhelmed by the movement,<br />

but were also part of it. Das Argument became<br />

the mouthpiece of the 1968 movement. The print run<br />

jumped from 700 to 18,000.<br />

I was a Marxist before I was a feminist. But it was<br />

women from the SDS who were at the frontlines of<br />

the women's revolt. Media made it look like women<br />

in the SDS were limited to typing flyers and making<br />

coffee. That’s a total myth – I was in the SDS from the<br />

beginning and I never typed a flyer or made coffee.<br />

That said, women and women’s issues were never<br />

recognised as such in the movement and there was a<br />

grand total of seven women in SDS at the time. That’s<br />

when I joined the Action Committee for the Liberation<br />

of Women, which was<br />

just forming, in January or<br />

February 1968.<br />

“The men in the<br />

‘68 movement<br />

tolerated us...<br />

but the women’s<br />

movement was<br />

often called ‘petty<br />

bourgeois’ and<br />

'marginal'.”<br />

Women take action<br />

We questioned all the morals<br />

of the petty bourgeois:<br />

prudery, pettiness and<br />

taboos. We talked about the<br />

power of mass media. Axel<br />

Springer, the king of the Bild<br />

newspaper, was our enemy<br />

number one. We studied how<br />

the press creates submissive<br />

citizens. We believed that<br />

the situation of women was<br />

primarily a result of deficiencies<br />

in education, and we wanted to counter that with<br />

a a “political literacy” campaign. Our slogan from the<br />

socialist Frauenbund (women’s league) was: “Everyone<br />

should know everything!” I would say that men in the<br />

1968 movement tolerated us but didn’t actively support<br />

the women’s organisation. The women’s movement<br />

was often called “petty bourgeois” or “marginal” and<br />

not taken seriously.<br />

In Das Argument we had been studying Marx’s<br />

Grundrisse and Das Kapital, and I took that with me<br />

into the Action Committee. One wing of the movement<br />

wanted to organise a kindergarten teachers’<br />

strike. They believed that from an early age children<br />

were raised to be authoritarian personalities, so they<br />

needed an alternative perspective and way of life. But<br />

I had just escaped from a year trapped at home with<br />

a baby – I didn’t just want to talk about mothers and<br />

children. I wanted to study the big picture: How do<br />

women end up in a situation where, as soon as they<br />

MAY <strong>2018</strong><br />

9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!