14.12.2012 Views

Sun-Earth-Man - PlasmaResources

Sun-Earth-Man - PlasmaResources

Sun-Earth-Man - PlasmaResources

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

time series of X-ray bursts comprising the same sampling intewaIs of half a<br />

month. The calculation based on the Burg-algorithm covers 312 data points<br />

and 301 frequencies. The filter length of 82 coefficients is in accord with the<br />

suggestion of most authors not to go beyond 30% of the number of data<br />

pointsq5' The extreme sensitivity of the MEM can lead to spectra1 shifts or<br />

spectrum instability, especially when the filter length is extended beyond 30<br />

to 40% of the length of the time series. Experiments with different filter lengths<br />

up to 40% show that the spectrum presented in Figure 17 is stable. There is<br />

no shift in the outstanding frequencies. The MEM spectrum shows the same<br />

prominent peaks at the same frequencies as in the Blackman-Tukey power<br />

spectrum. A narrower sampling interval of !4 month does not change the<br />

result.<br />

It is a disadvantage of the MEM that an acknowledged reliability test of<br />

spectra1 peaks does not yet exist. According to the simple and useful "rule of.<br />

thumb'' expressed by Stuart et a1. ,52 a spectral peak is regarded to be significant<br />

if it contains at leastthree computed points which deviate from the noise and<br />

has a maximum two or three times greater than the surrounding noise level.<br />

According to this standard the peaks in Figure 17 marked by period pointers<br />

deviate significantly from the noise. As these are the same peaks as in the<br />

Blackman-Tukey spectrum of Figure 16 that proved to be significant at<br />

confidence levels going up to %%,;here is sufficient evidence supporting their<br />

reality. A further replication is contributed by dividing the data set in klf. The<br />

maximum entropy spectra for each half again set off the peaks around 4.8,2.8,<br />

1.2, and I .I months; only the 156 months period is lost, as was to be expected.<br />

V. PLANETARY CONTROL OF THE SUNS'S MOTION 43<br />

V. PLANETARY CONTROL OF THE SUN'S MOTION ABOUT<br />

THE CENTRE OF MASS OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM<br />

The prominent cyclic features are consistently present in all spectra examined.<br />

Thus, there are sufficient reasons to propose the working hypothesis that the<br />

incidence of X-ray flares in the 1 to 8 A range shows a cyclic pattern. Where<br />

do these flare cycles come from? As to predictions, this is a crucial question<br />

because the analysis is based on the rather small time-span of 13 years. If there<br />

are strong variations in the actual period of cycles, forecasts of flares and<br />

connected terrestrial events will go astray if it is not clear which changes will<br />

o'ccur. It will be shown that the prominent amplitudes in the spectra indeed<br />

represent quasi-cycles with wide variations in their periods. The knowledge<br />

of the mean period of such quasicycles is no real help in predictions. The 12year<br />

sunspot cycle with a range of variation from 7 to 17 years is an example<br />

of this. As long as it is not known how the cycle is regulated, there will be no<br />

solid basis for predictions. Without a reasoned physical background to guide<br />

selection, there is a severe risk of finding accidental patterns in diverse and<br />

varied data sets. The statistical analysis of Fast data does not constitute a<br />

reliable means to foresee future change in the data pattern. Thus, it is of both<br />

practical and theoretical importance that the spectrum can be exactly related<br />

to thk variation in astrophysical quantities and to calculable planetary<br />

configumtions by an approach following the fundamental rule of Operations<br />

res lrch that the behaviour of any part of a system has some effect on the<br />

beKsyiour of the system as a whole. The results were tested by extended<br />

forecast experiments described above.<br />

The first process involved are impulses of the torque (IOT) in the <strong>Sun</strong>'s<br />

motion about the centre of mass of the solar system (CM) that were mentioned<br />

already. They are induced by special heliocentric consteIIations of the giant<br />

planets Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus,.and Neptune. Figure 18 shows the ecIiptic<br />

positions of CM relative to the <strong>Sun</strong>'s centre for 1945 to 1995. The heliocentric<br />

representation and the line marking the limb of the <strong>Sun</strong> make it easy to see<br />

whether CM is to be found above or below the <strong>Sun</strong>'s surface; most of the time<br />

it is on the outside of the <strong>Sun</strong>'s body. The distance of both centres varies from<br />

0.01 to 2.19 solar radii. It takes 9 to 14 years to complete one revolution. In<br />

relation to the galactic centre only CM follows an elliptic path around the centre<br />

of mass of the Milky Way system, whereas the <strong>Sun</strong> describes a very irregular<br />

helix around the elliptic line of motion of CM. The planets' paths are still more<br />

complicated. There is mutual interdependence. While the planets make the<br />

<strong>Sun</strong> oscillate around CM, the <strong>Sun</strong> induces a still more intricate dance of the<br />

planets about the centre of mass of the solar system. Newton was the first to<br />

see this: "Since that centre of gravity is continually at rest, the <strong>Sun</strong>, according<br />

to the various positions of the planets, must continually move every way, but<br />

will never recede far from that ~entre."~ In 1928 Ludwig Zehnder " suspected<br />

a connection of the <strong>Sun</strong>'s motion with the 1 1-year sunspot cycle. Paul D. Jose "5<br />

made a thorough computer analysis of this special relation in 1965.<br />

Unforhnately, h~s predictions for the 11- year sunspot cycle No. 21, based on<br />

his analysis, failed to be accurate.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!