13.12.2019 Views

Israelites, Pharisees & Sadducees In The 21st Century Church

Israelites, Pharisees & Sadducees In The 21st Century Church

Israelites, Pharisees & Sadducees In The 21st Century Church

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In Neusner's view, the rabbinic project, as acted out in the Talmud, reflected not the

world as it was but the world as rabbis dreamed it should be.

According to S. Baron however, there existed "a general willingness of the people to

follow its self imposed Rabbinic rulership". Although the Rabbis lacked authority to

impose capital punishment "Flagellation and heavy fines, combined with an extensive

system of excommunication were more than enough to uphold the authority of the

courts." In fact, the Rabbis took over more and more power from the Reish Galuta until

eventually R' Ashi assumed the title Rabbana, heretofore assumed by the exilarch, and

appeared together with two other Rabbis as an official delegation "at the gate of King

Yazdegard's court." The Amorah (and Tanna) Rav was a personal friend of the last

Parthian king Artabenus and Shmuel was close to Shapur I, King of Persia. Thus, the

Rabbis had significant means of "coercion" and the people seem to have followed the

Rabbinic rulership.

Pharisees and Christianity

The Pharisees appear in the New Testament, engaging in conflicts between themselves

and John the Baptist and with Jesus, and because Nicodemus the Pharisee (John 3:1)

with Joseph of Arimathea entombed Jesus' body at great personal risk. Gamaliel, the

highly respected rabbi and defender of the apostles, was also a Pharisee, and

according to some Christian traditions secretly converted to Christianity.

There are several references in the New Testament to Paul the Apostle being a

Pharisee before converting to Christianity, and other members of the Pharisee sect are

known from Acts 15:5 to have become Christian believers. It was some members of his

group who argued that gentile converts must be circumcised and obliged to follow the

Mosaic law, leading to a dispute within the early Church addressed at the Apostolic

Council in Jerusalem, in 50 CE.

The New Testament, particularly the Synoptic Gospels, presents especially the

leadership of the Pharisees as obsessed with man-made rules (especially concerning

purity) whereas Jesus is more concerned with God's love; the Pharisees scorn sinners

whereas Jesus seeks them out. (The Gospel of John, which is the only gospel where

Nicodemus is mentioned, particularly portrays the sect as divided and willing to debate.)

Because of the New Testament's frequent depictions of Pharisees as self-righteous

rule-followers (see also Woes of the Pharisees and Legalism (theology)), the word

"pharisee" (and its derivatives: "pharisaical", etc.) has come into semi-common usage in

English to describe a hypocritical and arrogant person who places the letter of the law

above its spirit. Jews today typically find this insulting and some consider the use of the

word to be anti-Semitic.

Some have speculated that Jesus was himself a Pharisee and that his arguments with

Pharisees is a sign of inclusion rather than fundamental conflict (disputation being the

dominant narrative mode employed in the Talmud as a search for truth, and not

necessarily a sign of opposition). Jesus' emphasis on loving one's neighbor (see Great

Page 58 of 176

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!