06.01.2020 Views

Open Access e-Journal Cardiometry - No.15 November 2019

We have decided to dedicate this issue to discussing sports medicine topics, namely, to defining what is the healthy heart performance. We are glad to present some fresh papers considering these problems of physiology in sports from the standpoint of cardiometry: the material is an integral part of a new book, which will be published within the nearest future.

We have decided to dedicate this issue to discussing sports medicine topics, namely, to defining what is the healthy heart performance. We are glad to present some fresh papers considering these problems of physiology in sports from the standpoint of cardiometry: the material is an integral part of a new book, which will be published within the nearest future.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

patients, symptom-onset-to-treatment time was significantly

lower for those in the WhatsApp group

compared with the other patients 150 vs 200 minutes

(P < 0.001).

The novelty of the current study (apart from being

the 1st on a national base and may be in the Arab

world) emerges from the fact that we not only evaluated

the impact of WhatsApp transfer on key time

intervals, but also we discussed in details its impact on

various important echocardiographic parameters and

selected in-hospital outcomes (namely, hospital stay

and all-cause in-hospital mortality). Notably, the D2B

times in the current study were exceedingly higher

than what’s recommended in the guidelines (this was

true even among the group with the best-case-scenario

‘group 3’). Taking the observational nature of the

current study into consideration, this might represent

a call for action, that much effort is still needed to the

close the gap between the real situation in a developing

country like Egypt and the guideline-recommended

time frames.

Two main limitations deserve mention, first, the

relatively small sample size did not allow the power for

calculation of the full spectrum of in-hospital clinical

outcomes. Second, no formal calculation of the doorin-door-out

(DIDO) time was done. This is because

patients in groups 1 and 2 were mixed population (including

those who were transferred from a non-PCI

capable centers and those who presented directly to

the PCI centers included in the study).

Conclusions

Using smartphone messaging applications such

as WhatsApp for pre-activation of CCL teams during

inter-hospital transfer for STEMI primary PCI is associated

with scientifically shorter ED waiting and

D2B times. This might be relevant for develop-ing

countries lacking inter-hospital robust communication

systems. Adequately powered randomized trial is

needed to evaluate the impact of such a strategy on

clinical outcomes.

Statement on ethical issues

Research involving people and/or animals is in full

compliance with current na-tional and international

ethical standards.

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Author contributions

The authors read the ICMJE criteria for authorship

and approved the final manuscript.

References

1. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines

for the management of acute myocardial infarction

in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation:

The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial

infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment

elevation of the European Society of Cardiology

(ESC). European heart journal. 2017; 39: 119-77. Doi:

10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393

2. Stone GW, Dixon SR, Grines CL, et al. Predictors

of infarct size after primary coronary angioplasty in

acute myocardial infarction from pooled analysis

from four contemporary trials. The American journal

of cardiology. 2007; 100: 1370-5. Doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.06.027

3. Brodie BR, Stone GW, Cox DA,et al. Impact of

treatment delays on outcomes of primary percutaneous

coronary intervention for acute myocardial

infarction: analysis from the CADILLAC trial. American

heart journal. 2006; 15: 1231-8. Doi: 10.1016/j.

ahj.2005.07.016

4. Menees DS, Peterson ED, Wang Y, et al. Door-toballoon

time and mortality among patients undergoing

primary PCI. New England Journal of Medicine.

2013; 369: 901-9. Doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1208200

5. Fordyce CB, Al-Khalidi HR, Jollis JG, et al. Association

of rapid care process implementation on reperfusion

times across multiple ST-segment–elevation

myocardial infarction networks. Circulation: Cardiovascular

Interventions. 2017; 10: e004061. Doi: 10.1161/

CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004061

6. Bagai A, Jollis JG, Dauerman HL, et al. Emergency

department bypass for ST-segment–elevation myocardial

infarction patients identified with a prehospital

electrocardiogram: a report from the American

Heart Association Mission: Lifeline Program. Circulation.

2013; 128: 352-9. Doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIO-

NAHA.113.002339

7. Helal AM, Shaheen SM, Elhammady WA, et al. Primary

PCI versus pharma-coinvasive strategy for ST

elevation myocardial infarction. IJC heart & vascu-lature.

2018; 21: 87-93. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2018.10.006

8. Bendary A, Tawfek W, Mahros M, et al. Primary

PCI versus Pharmaco-Invasive Strategy in Patients

with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction; a Random-

Issue 15. November 2019 | Cardiometry | 61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!