Open Access e-Journal Cardiometry - No.15 November 2019
We have decided to dedicate this issue to discussing sports medicine topics, namely, to defining what is the healthy heart performance. We are glad to present some fresh papers considering these problems of physiology in sports from the standpoint of cardiometry: the material is an integral part of a new book, which will be published within the nearest future.
We have decided to dedicate this issue to discussing sports medicine topics, namely, to defining what is the healthy heart performance. We are glad to present some fresh papers considering these problems of physiology in sports from the standpoint of cardiometry: the material is an integral part of a new book, which will be published within the nearest future.
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
patients, symptom-onset-to-treatment time was significantly
lower for those in the WhatsApp group
compared with the other patients 150 vs 200 minutes
(P < 0.001).
The novelty of the current study (apart from being
the 1st on a national base and may be in the Arab
world) emerges from the fact that we not only evaluated
the impact of WhatsApp transfer on key time
intervals, but also we discussed in details its impact on
various important echocardiographic parameters and
selected in-hospital outcomes (namely, hospital stay
and all-cause in-hospital mortality). Notably, the D2B
times in the current study were exceedingly higher
than what’s recommended in the guidelines (this was
true even among the group with the best-case-scenario
‘group 3’). Taking the observational nature of the
current study into consideration, this might represent
a call for action, that much effort is still needed to the
close the gap between the real situation in a developing
country like Egypt and the guideline-recommended
time frames.
Two main limitations deserve mention, first, the
relatively small sample size did not allow the power for
calculation of the full spectrum of in-hospital clinical
outcomes. Second, no formal calculation of the doorin-door-out
(DIDO) time was done. This is because
patients in groups 1 and 2 were mixed population (including
those who were transferred from a non-PCI
capable centers and those who presented directly to
the PCI centers included in the study).
Conclusions
Using smartphone messaging applications such
as WhatsApp for pre-activation of CCL teams during
inter-hospital transfer for STEMI primary PCI is associated
with scientifically shorter ED waiting and
D2B times. This might be relevant for develop-ing
countries lacking inter-hospital robust communication
systems. Adequately powered randomized trial is
needed to evaluate the impact of such a strategy on
clinical outcomes.
Statement on ethical issues
Research involving people and/or animals is in full
compliance with current na-tional and international
ethical standards.
Conflict of interest
None declared.
Author contributions
The authors read the ICMJE criteria for authorship
and approved the final manuscript.
References
1. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines
for the management of acute myocardial infarction
in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation:
The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial
infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment
elevation of the European Society of Cardiology
(ESC). European heart journal. 2017; 39: 119-77. Doi:
10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393
2. Stone GW, Dixon SR, Grines CL, et al. Predictors
of infarct size after primary coronary angioplasty in
acute myocardial infarction from pooled analysis
from four contemporary trials. The American journal
of cardiology. 2007; 100: 1370-5. Doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.06.027
3. Brodie BR, Stone GW, Cox DA,et al. Impact of
treatment delays on outcomes of primary percutaneous
coronary intervention for acute myocardial
infarction: analysis from the CADILLAC trial. American
heart journal. 2006; 15: 1231-8. Doi: 10.1016/j.
ahj.2005.07.016
4. Menees DS, Peterson ED, Wang Y, et al. Door-toballoon
time and mortality among patients undergoing
primary PCI. New England Journal of Medicine.
2013; 369: 901-9. Doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1208200
5. Fordyce CB, Al-Khalidi HR, Jollis JG, et al. Association
of rapid care process implementation on reperfusion
times across multiple ST-segment–elevation
myocardial infarction networks. Circulation: Cardiovascular
Interventions. 2017; 10: e004061. Doi: 10.1161/
CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004061
6. Bagai A, Jollis JG, Dauerman HL, et al. Emergency
department bypass for ST-segment–elevation myocardial
infarction patients identified with a prehospital
electrocardiogram: a report from the American
Heart Association Mission: Lifeline Program. Circulation.
2013; 128: 352-9. Doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIO-
NAHA.113.002339
7. Helal AM, Shaheen SM, Elhammady WA, et al. Primary
PCI versus pharma-coinvasive strategy for ST
elevation myocardial infarction. IJC heart & vascu-lature.
2018; 21: 87-93. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2018.10.006
8. Bendary A, Tawfek W, Mahros M, et al. Primary
PCI versus Pharmaco-Invasive Strategy in Patients
with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction; a Random-
Issue 15. November 2019 | Cardiometry | 61