06.05.2020 Views

Ashburton Courier: May 07, 2020

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Local news at www.starnews.co.nz <strong>Ashburton</strong>'s The <strong>Courier</strong>, Thursday <strong>May</strong> 7, <strong>2020</strong>, Page 13<br />

Mid Canterbury Rural<br />

&Lifestyle Specialists.<br />

Mid Canterbury focus andgetting message acrossthat<br />

we areopen forbusiness and that real estategoeson!<br />

The value of water<br />

Thetopic of wateralways attractspassionate discussioninbothurbanand ruralcircles.<br />

Waterreally is the“source of life”. Cleanwater to drink-essential, clean rivers and lakesfor<br />

animal lifeand recreation- essential, sufficientwatertosustainplant growthtoprovidefood –<br />

essential,beitnaturalrainorirrigation.Especially so if climate change is upon us we needto<br />

considerwhatfood canbeproducedifnatural watersourcesbecomelimited. Theconundrum<br />

we haveisthataspopulationgrows the quantum of waterisfiniteand needsbesharedor<br />

allocatedtomaximise thebenefits.<br />

It is here where thewaterusers starttobecome diverse!! Thereare many different callsonour<br />

waterresources. LegallytheCrown owns allthe freshwater in New Zealand, much in thesame<br />

way asitownsthe mineralsunder theland. Hence theneed to obtainResourceConsents,<br />

permits andlicences to utilise naturalresources.These areassessed on a“benefit”versus<br />

“detriment’ basiseitheronNational or Regional scale then dropping down to District (say<br />

Community )and individualbasis.<br />

We all understand waterisnot alimitless resource. Get adry summer in Christchurch andwith<br />

everybodyonwaterrestrictions andnotethe angst against waterbottlerstaking millions of<br />

litres from theaquifer without anypayment. Shouldtheypay?Ifthey do is it still economic?<br />

What is the valueofthe economic benefits lost if they shut?Whatisapriority,keeping our<br />

lawnsgreen or providingjobs andincome? Thesame in agriculture.Thereis“competition’<br />

betweenagri waterusers and urbanand recreationalusers forboth qualityandquantity.<br />

Thereiscompetition betweenfarmers forthe same resource as theaquifer arenot limitless<br />

andgenerallythereisnomoreirrigationwater available unlessyouare in an area serviced by<br />

an IrrigationScheme. As afunction of this trade-ablewater rights originatedand werebid for<br />

whenoffered in muchthe same way asapropertyTender.InCanterbury Ecan have stepped<br />

in,asmodeling suggested the groundwaterresources were largely over allocated, sotrades<br />

becomesubjecttoareview andinmostcases Ecan reduced theconsented watertake able<br />

to be transferred. This oftenleftthe residual at sub optimal levels and notworth trading from<br />

afarmmanagementperspective.Asaresult to my knowledge it hasstoppedthe waterbeing<br />

traded.<br />

2510 MethvenHighway<br />

Idon’tpretend to hold theanswers. Ithink we allagreeweneedtobecollaborative and<br />

theprogress made betweenfarming leadersand waterrepresentative bodiesshould be<br />

acknowledgedmorethan it has. Onething Iseeclearly isthat, in MidCanterburywhere I<br />

am domiciled, is that forwardthinking pioneersofour irrigationschemes utilising shared<br />

waterresources from our rivers,sensible storage, somewithlow energygravityfed pressurised<br />

pipedwater, enhancedthewider District andNational economy. The followon is thousands<br />

of jobs,broaddiversificationofproductsandhenceabroaderrangeofinternationaltrading<br />

partners lowering economic risktoall. Suresomewilldobetterthan others. ButamongstthisI<br />

seesomefantasticrecreational opportunitiesaka Twizeland thenearbylakesasanexample<br />

whereeverybodygets abenefit.Wecan maximise thesocial and economic benefit when we<br />

collaborate.<br />

Iturnedmy mind to all this as IwalkedaroundLakeHoodthismorning andheardaradio<br />

commentatortalkingabout waterresource charging.Atsome point thiswould createa<br />

cost ofnotonlythechargesbutthecost of collectingthem. <strong>May</strong>bethe wateruse suddenly<br />

becomes uneconomic and developmentstalls. If ourDistricthad to payfor the watertake<br />

to feed Lake Hoodwould it ever happened?Ifthebusiness people whodonatedthe seed<br />

capitalandtheir timepaid forwater would they have the surplustodonate? Every situation is<br />

different butweshouldlook at both sides and assessthe dual benefit as thepriority and work<br />

to mitigate the balance. Nothing willeverbeperfect butisthat is nota reason to do nothing?<br />

What made methink aboutthis wasthismorning,Isaw aDad with his songoing fishing.<br />

They lookedprettyhappy.Isaw somepeople from town on theirbikes. Theylookedpretty<br />

happy. Isaw people paddling kayaks.They looked prettyhappy.The foresight ofearlier<br />

generationscan take creditfor alot ofpeoplebeinghappynot just in MidCanterbury but all<br />

around NZ.<br />

Greg Jopson<br />

027 447 4382<br />

Chris Murdoch<br />

027 434 2545<br />

Rodger Letham<br />

027 433 3436<br />

350 Line Road, Methven<br />

Paul Cunneen<br />

027 432 3382<br />

Robert Harnett<br />

027 432 3562<br />

Writtenby<br />

Paul Cunneen<br />

RuralLifestyleSales Consultant<br />

pb.co.nz<br />

Property Brokers Ltd Licensed REAA 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!