Ashburton Courier: May 07, 2020
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Local news at www.starnews.co.nz <strong>Ashburton</strong>'s The <strong>Courier</strong>, Thursday <strong>May</strong> 7, <strong>2020</strong>, Page 13<br />
Mid Canterbury Rural<br />
&Lifestyle Specialists.<br />
Mid Canterbury focus andgetting message acrossthat<br />
we areopen forbusiness and that real estategoeson!<br />
The value of water<br />
Thetopic of wateralways attractspassionate discussioninbothurbanand ruralcircles.<br />
Waterreally is the“source of life”. Cleanwater to drink-essential, clean rivers and lakesfor<br />
animal lifeand recreation- essential, sufficientwatertosustainplant growthtoprovidefood –<br />
essential,beitnaturalrainorirrigation.Especially so if climate change is upon us we needto<br />
considerwhatfood canbeproducedifnatural watersourcesbecomelimited. Theconundrum<br />
we haveisthataspopulationgrows the quantum of waterisfiniteand needsbesharedor<br />
allocatedtomaximise thebenefits.<br />
It is here where thewaterusers starttobecome diverse!! Thereare many different callsonour<br />
waterresources. LegallytheCrown owns allthe freshwater in New Zealand, much in thesame<br />
way asitownsthe mineralsunder theland. Hence theneed to obtainResourceConsents,<br />
permits andlicences to utilise naturalresources.These areassessed on a“benefit”versus<br />
“detriment’ basiseitheronNational or Regional scale then dropping down to District (say<br />
Community )and individualbasis.<br />
We all understand waterisnot alimitless resource. Get adry summer in Christchurch andwith<br />
everybodyonwaterrestrictions andnotethe angst against waterbottlerstaking millions of<br />
litres from theaquifer without anypayment. Shouldtheypay?Ifthey do is it still economic?<br />
What is the valueofthe economic benefits lost if they shut?Whatisapriority,keeping our<br />
lawnsgreen or providingjobs andincome? Thesame in agriculture.Thereis“competition’<br />
betweenagri waterusers and urbanand recreationalusers forboth qualityandquantity.<br />
Thereiscompetition betweenfarmers forthe same resource as theaquifer arenot limitless<br />
andgenerallythereisnomoreirrigationwater available unlessyouare in an area serviced by<br />
an IrrigationScheme. As afunction of this trade-ablewater rights originatedand werebid for<br />
whenoffered in muchthe same way asapropertyTender.InCanterbury Ecan have stepped<br />
in,asmodeling suggested the groundwaterresources were largely over allocated, sotrades<br />
becomesubjecttoareview andinmostcases Ecan reduced theconsented watertake able<br />
to be transferred. This oftenleftthe residual at sub optimal levels and notworth trading from<br />
afarmmanagementperspective.Asaresult to my knowledge it hasstoppedthe waterbeing<br />
traded.<br />
2510 MethvenHighway<br />
Idon’tpretend to hold theanswers. Ithink we allagreeweneedtobecollaborative and<br />
theprogress made betweenfarming leadersand waterrepresentative bodiesshould be<br />
acknowledgedmorethan it has. Onething Iseeclearly isthat, in MidCanterburywhere I<br />
am domiciled, is that forwardthinking pioneersofour irrigationschemes utilising shared<br />
waterresources from our rivers,sensible storage, somewithlow energygravityfed pressurised<br />
pipedwater, enhancedthewider District andNational economy. The followon is thousands<br />
of jobs,broaddiversificationofproductsandhenceabroaderrangeofinternationaltrading<br />
partners lowering economic risktoall. Suresomewilldobetterthan others. ButamongstthisI<br />
seesomefantasticrecreational opportunitiesaka Twizeland thenearbylakesasanexample<br />
whereeverybodygets abenefit.Wecan maximise thesocial and economic benefit when we<br />
collaborate.<br />
Iturnedmy mind to all this as IwalkedaroundLakeHoodthismorning andheardaradio<br />
commentatortalkingabout waterresource charging.Atsome point thiswould createa<br />
cost ofnotonlythechargesbutthecost of collectingthem. <strong>May</strong>bethe wateruse suddenly<br />
becomes uneconomic and developmentstalls. If ourDistricthad to payfor the watertake<br />
to feed Lake Hoodwould it ever happened?Ifthebusiness people whodonatedthe seed<br />
capitalandtheir timepaid forwater would they have the surplustodonate? Every situation is<br />
different butweshouldlook at both sides and assessthe dual benefit as thepriority and work<br />
to mitigate the balance. Nothing willeverbeperfect butisthat is nota reason to do nothing?<br />
What made methink aboutthis wasthismorning,Isaw aDad with his songoing fishing.<br />
They lookedprettyhappy.Isaw somepeople from town on theirbikes. Theylookedpretty<br />
happy. Isaw people paddling kayaks.They looked prettyhappy.The foresight ofearlier<br />
generationscan take creditfor alot ofpeoplebeinghappynot just in MidCanterbury but all<br />
around NZ.<br />
Greg Jopson<br />
027 447 4382<br />
Chris Murdoch<br />
027 434 2545<br />
Rodger Letham<br />
027 433 3436<br />
350 Line Road, Methven<br />
Paul Cunneen<br />
027 432 3382<br />
Robert Harnett<br />
027 432 3562<br />
Writtenby<br />
Paul Cunneen<br />
RuralLifestyleSales Consultant<br />
pb.co.nz<br />
Property Brokers Ltd Licensed REAA 2008