22.12.2012 Views

OUTLINE - Notre Dame University

OUTLINE - Notre Dame University

OUTLINE - Notre Dame University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

C O M M U<br />

This was the rather surprising title of Erik<br />

Peterson’s article in the review Communio that was<br />

discussed when the Communio Circle met on<br />

Thursday, 19th December, 2002. The presentation was<br />

made by Mr. Riad Mufarraj with remarkable insight<br />

into Patristic theology.<br />

Erik Peterson (1890-1960) is now realised as having<br />

been an unfairly neglected Christian thinker,<br />

although his retiring nature may be considered as<br />

largely to blame. He was brought up by an agnostic<br />

father and a severely Calvinist mother. From 1910<br />

onwards he followed theology courses in a number<br />

of German universities and qualified as a lecturer in<br />

1920, after specialising in classical and Christian epigraphy.<br />

After contact with such leading Protestant<br />

theologians as Harnack, Karl Barth and Rudolph<br />

Bultmann, he finally moved away from both liberal<br />

and dialectical theology towards Catholic notions of<br />

revelation, faith and Church. Despite attempts by<br />

such eminent friends as Jacques Maritain to help him,<br />

Theology of Dress<br />

A welcome to<br />

Communio<br />

from Dr. Edward Alam.<br />

he refused academic positions in the Catholic world,<br />

except one at the Pontifical Institute of Christian<br />

Archaeology, and lived a lonely and penurious life. A<br />

number of his theological and historical essays were<br />

published before he died in his birthplace, Hamburg,<br />

leaving a wife and five children.<br />

In the essay now published in English in Communio,<br />

he insisted that man’s dress was not, as is popularly<br />

supposed, a moral problem at all, but rather a metaphysical<br />

and theological one. He noted that those<br />

who advocated a cult of nudity did so out of conscious<br />

opposition to the Church on an ideological<br />

basis. This, incidentally, was confirmed by Dr.<br />

Eugene Sensenig-Dabbous (NDU) out of his own<br />

experience in German-speaking Europe. The author<br />

pointed out that the biblical account in Genesis refers<br />

to nakedness only after the Fall. The previous lack of<br />

clothing was not nakedness; nakedness supposes<br />

lack of clothing but is not identical with it (it should<br />

hardly be necessary to point out that the popular<br />

belief that Adam’s sin was a sexual one is utterly erro-<br />

12 NNU SPIRIT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!