- Page 1 and 2: Praca Dyplomowa Temat pracy: Badani
- Page 3 and 4: wcześniej aplikacje. Nie mniej jed
- Page 5: NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND
- Page 10 and 11: SUMMARY Sculptures and other artifa
- Page 12 and 13: 4.2 Three-dimensional scanning ....
- Page 14 and 15: Figure 6.3 Visual comparison of mod
- Page 16 and 17: INTRODUCTION had been the cathedral
- Page 18 and 19: INTRODUCTION Figure 1.2 Actual scul
- Page 20 and 21: 2 THEORETICAL BACKGROUND 2.1 Review
- Page 22 and 23: THEORETICAL BACKGROUND photos are p
- Page 24 and 25: Where: T - depth of field R - the f
- Page 26 and 27: THEORETICAL BACKGROUND To make came
- Page 28 and 29: THEORETICAL BACKGROUND Figure 2.5 E
- Page 30 and 31: THEORETICAL BACKGROUND Figure 2.8 E
- Page 32 and 33: THEORETICAL BACKGROUND The bundle a
- Page 34 and 35: THEORETICAL BACKGROUND RMSE - root
- Page 36 and 37: THEORETICAL BACKGROUND In the begin
- Page 38 and 39: THEORETICAL BACKGROUND Single point
- Page 40 and 41: THEORETICAL BACKGROUND opportunitie
- Page 42 and 43: 3 INSTRUMENTS AND SOFTWARE 3.1 Comp
- Page 44 and 45: 3.2.4 PhotoModeler Scanner Software
- Page 46 and 47: INSTRUMENTS AND SOFTWARE 3.3.2 Arte
- Page 48 and 49: 4 EXPERIMENT 4.1 Photogrammetry 4.1
- Page 50 and 51: EXPERIMENT � Tripod For image rec
- Page 52 and 53: EXPERIMENT In the project both ways
- Page 54 and 55: EXPERIMENT Figure 4.4 Residuals on
- Page 56 and 57:
EXPERIMENT Figure 4.5 Coloured poin
- Page 58 and 59:
EXPERIMENT Figure 4.7 Final Maximum
- Page 60 and 61:
EXPERIMENT 4.2.2 Artec MHT three-di
- Page 62 and 63:
EXPERIMENT was removed before mergi
- Page 64 and 65:
RESULTS, COMPARISSON AND ANALYSIS o
- Page 66 and 67:
RESULTS, COMPARISSON AND ANALYSIS N
- Page 68 and 69:
RESULTS, COMPARISSON AND ANALYSIS F
- Page 70 and 71:
RESULTS, COMPARISSON AND ANALYSIS F
- Page 72 and 73:
RESULTS, COMPARISSON AND ANALYSIS F
- Page 74 and 75:
RESULTS, COMPARISSON AND ANALYSIS F
- Page 76 and 77:
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION between a
- Page 78 and 79:
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION Figure 6.
- Page 80 and 81:
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION Figure 6.
- Page 82 and 83:
REFERENCES Blake, W.H., 2010. WHAT
- Page 84 and 85:
REFERENCES Prokos, A., Kalisperakis
- Page 86 and 87:
APPENDIXES APPENDIXES A. 1 Specific
- Page 88 and 89:
APPENDIXES 74
- Page 90 and 91:
APPENDIXES A. 2 Report - results of
- Page 92 and 93:
APPENDIXES A. 3 Comparison on photo
- Page 94 and 95:
APPENDIXES Application PhotoModeler
- Page 96 and 97:
APPENDIXES Model Konica Minolta VI-
- Page 98 and 99:
APPENDIXES Application Konica Minol
- Page 100 and 101:
APPENDIXES A. 6 Geomagic Qualify: m
- Page 102 and 103:
APPENDIXES Application Geomagic Qua
- Page 104 and 105:
APPENDIXES Blais, F., 2004. Review
- Page 106:
http://www.topconpositioning.com/.