10.01.2021 Views

Odds and Ends Essays, Blogs, Internet Discussions, Interviews and Miscellany

Collected essays, blogs, internet discussions, interviews and miscellany, from 2005 - 2020

Collected essays, blogs, internet discussions, interviews and miscellany, from 2005 - 2020

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

to Men in the early part of their adult Age, what Playthings are to Children; they teach them a love for

Regularity, Exactness, Truth, Simplicity; […] and when [these] social, moral, and religious Affections

begin to be generated in us, we may make a much quicker progress towards the perfection of our

natures. (Hartley, Vol 2, 244)

In this way, then, the objects of nature are envisaged as having something of an instructive role in the development

of character, especially regarding moral development.

Hartley also hypothesized on the origins of language. He thought that since speech was a necessary requirement for

Adam and Eve to name the animals in Eden, God granted it to them and from this faculty the original Edenic or

Adamic language developed. Initially, this language was monosyllabic and its usage was limited to referring to visible

phenomena. After the Fall, Hartley supposes that Adam and Eve “extended their Language to new Objects and Ideas”

and principally to those associated with pain (Hartley, Vol 1, 298). Eventually, this language became corrupted, as

humans acquired names for evil things, which led to a greater propagation of self-interest and such aspirations as the

Tower of Babel which the Babylonians thought they could build high enough to reach the Heavens (Genesis 11; 1-9).

In response, God disrupted the construction of the Tower by causing the workers to speak in different tongues, thus

protecting the Edenic language from further corruption and doing something to limit the dissemination of false

perceptions.

These false perceptions were the result of the corrupted language having acquired the means to become ambiguous

- a major departure from Adam’s original language, which was unequivocal. By the eighteenth century, the

expansion of knowledge had resulted, as Hartley saw it, in humanity having moved closer to an original state of pure

knowledge. This being the case, it was necessary to go back to the original language of Adam, integrating the

languages of the world in the process, to reinstate the purity of the original language. This language would be a

philosophical one “without any Deficiency, Superfluity, or Equivocation” (Hartley, Vol 1, 315). (This idea anticipates

the aspirations of the Logical Positivists, c. 1920-40.)

Among those who were influenced by Hartley’s ideas were William Wordsworth and Samuel Taylor Coleridge. In his

Preface to Lyrical Ballads Wordsworth refers on several occasions to mental associations, and it is possible to see

how Hartley’s theory is the source of his interest in bodily sensation that is evident in passages such as “our bodies

feel, where’er they be / Against or with our will” (“Expostulation and Reply”); “sensations sweet, / Felt in the blood,

and felt along the heart; / And passing even into my purer mind” (“Tintern Abbey”). Similarly, in Coleridge’s verse

we can see references to Hartley’s notion of a physiological process causally linking mind and matter, as the

following lines dedicated to him in Religious Musings illustrate:

he of mortal kind

Wisest, he first who marked the ideal tribes

Up the fine fibres through the sentient brain.

Moreover, we can see Hartley’s theory implicitly expressed in poetic terms in Coleridge’s “Frost at Midnight”. In

further demonstrations of his esteem for Hartley, Coleridge not only had his portrait painted with Observations on

Man resting on his knee, but he famously named his son (David Hartley Coleridge) after Hartley. However,

Coleridge’s passion for Hartley was later to diminish when he came to see that Hartley’s theory was untenable in

relation to what Coleridge had observed of his infant son’s attempts at language acquisition.

Hartley’s ideas found favour amongst many other leading thinkers, including the scientist Joseph Priestley, who

considered Observations on Man as second only to the Bible in significance. Others who were directly or indirectly

influenced by him include: James Mill, John Stuart Mill, William Benjamin Carpenter, Alexander Bain, Abraham

Tucker, Archibald Alison and Thomas Brown.

Hartley died on August 28, 1757 whilst still a practicing physician in Bath.

Works Cited

Coleridge, S. T., The Poetical Works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, ed. by J. D. Campbell (London: Macmillan, 1938)

Hartley, D., Observations of Man: His Frame, His Duty, His Expectations, 2 vols (New York: Delmar, 1976)

167

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!