10.01.2021 Views

Odds and Ends Essays, Blogs, Internet Discussions, Interviews and Miscellany

Collected essays, blogs, internet discussions, interviews and miscellany, from 2005 - 2020

Collected essays, blogs, internet discussions, interviews and miscellany, from 2005 - 2020

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Indeed, Geoffrey Hartman, in relation to Descriptive Sketches, mentions Wordsworth’s failure to wrest control of the

visual sense from its subservience to nature:

The eye, the most despotic of the bodily senses in Wordsworth, is thwarted in a peculiar manner. It

seeks to localise in nature the mind’s intuition of ‘powers and presences’, yet nature itself seems

opposed to this process, and leads the eye restlessly from scene to scene. 6

In this view of Wordsworth, it is nature, or sense data, which is the controlling factor in vision. Similarly, in Book II of

The Prelude, Wordsworth recognises nature’s unremitting controlling influence over his senses:

My soul was unsubdued. A plastic power

Abode with me; a forming hand, at times

Rebellious, acting in a devious mood;

A local spirit of his own, at war

With general tendency, but, for the most,

Subservient strictly to external things

With which it communed. 7

However, Wordsworth’s recognition of the despotic nature of vision should not lead us to the conclusion that his

passivity in the presence of nature was undesirable to him. Wordsworth’s writings and correspondence are replete

with his advocacy of what has been called the ‘static nominals of reason’: his use of language in a nominal way. 8

David Pirie, in William Wordsworth: The Poetry of Grandeur and of Tenderness, comments that, ‘instead of concocting

imaginary worlds for our diversion’, Wordsworth, ‘directs us back to the one world which is real’. 9 In ‘Techniques of

Truth in the Poetry of William Wordsworth and Ezra Pound’, Geoffrey Clifford Jaggs notes:

His interest is not in language for itself, but as a means to an end. That end is an irreducibly empiricist

one: we are of the earth, our nature bound up in the larger nature that sustains us. Our engagement

with the universe is prior to language, but language-or poetic language, at least-is in a constant state

of reaching out to the universe. 10

Elements of this can be seen in his poem ‘The Influence of Natural Objects’:

Wisdom and Spirit of the universe!

Thou Soul, that art the Eternity of thought!

And giv’st to forms and images a breath

And everlasting motion! not in vain,

By day or star-light, thus from my first dawn

Of childhood didst thou intertwine for me

The passions that build up our human soul;

Not with the mean and vulgar works of Man;

But with high objects, with enduring things,

With life and nature; 11

With regard to Wordsworth’s subtitle for Book VIII of The Prelude (‘Love of Nature leading to Love of Man’) Pirie

writes:

This subtitle still misdirects many readers in their approach to The Prelude as a whole and to much of

Wordsworth’s other poetry as well. […] ‘Love of Nature’ sounds soothingly abstract whereas the

poetry itself is often defiantly concrete and insists upon the unqualified actuality of ‘rocks, and stones

and trees’. 12

Of the poems in Lyrical Ballads Wordsworth writes, ‘I have at all times endeavoured to look steadily at my subject,

consequently, I hope that there is in these poems little falsehood of description’. 13 In a letter to his sister concerning

Dryden he writes:

That his [Dryden’s] cannot be the language of imagination must have necessarily followed from this.

That there is not a single image from Nature in the whole body of his works; and in his translation from

37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!