Odds and Ends Essays, Blogs, Internet Discussions, Interviews and Miscellany

More documents

Recommendations

Info

my digressive strategies. It seems strange you represented my collections as e-books unless you werealigning yourself in another silent debate in poetry.Jeffrey Side:Ann, I was unaware that the links to your ebooks were not working. I will correct that. If I had intendedto remove the actual ebooks I would not have left them as listed on the site. If that is what all yoursilliness is about, then you should have told me the links were inactive instead of causing trouble here. Iassumed you were more mature than this.Regarding my saying Bobbi Lurie was psychotic. I said her emails to me had become psychotic andconfusing to me, much like your posts here have been.Ann Bogle:Define “psychotic” then. You are wildly evasive. Who knew you were wild? I wrote “distrustful” and youare not? I wrote “confusion” and you are not confused. Bobbi knows about this correspondence that Jeffquotes here accurately (it is plain that Jeff and I do not have day jobs), painstakingly, and, okay,Princess Di . . .Shortly after this exchange, Marc Vincenz told me that Ann had now left the Otherstream Facebook group. I wish herno ill will, and hope she can resolve some of the issues she has with me.Second Response to Ann Bogle14 August 2012Here is Ann Bogle’s response to my blog post of 11 August 2012:http://annbogle.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/jeffrey-side-and-american-candid.htmlIn that blog post I explain that I didn’t call Bobbi Lurie “psychotic”, as Ann had previously said I had done in an emailto Ann, but had, rather, referred to Bobbi’s emails to me as becoming ‘more and more psychotic and confusing’,principally at the point at which Bobbi accused me in one email of trying to make her cancer worse. I think anyoneaccused of this would take such an accusation as not being consistent with reality, hence my use of the word“psychotic” in relation to this. The word “psychotic” means, by the way, in case Ann doesn’t know the definition of it,“being out of touch with reality”, and as Bobbi’s accusation that I was trying to make her cancer worse falls verymuch into this area, I felt justified in using that word. I did not say, I stress, that Bobbi, herself, was psychotic, butthat what she was saying was.Ann says in her response to my blog post that Bobbi has told her that Bobbi might seek legal advice regarding my useof the word “psychotic”. Ann says of Bobbi: ‘She says the word “psychotic” is incriminating even in defence against it.She emailed she could find a lawyer’. If one can’t refer to the word “psychotic” to defend oneself from the accusationthat they had called someone it, then that would be very strange. I’m only going, though, by what Ann says Bobbi hassaid regarding this. I don’t know if Bobbi said it or not.Ann also says in her response to my blog post that my blog post accuses Ann of incompetence and malicious gossip. Idon’t think I do accuse her of the former but certainly of the latter, as the latter was, as is plain from my blog post,motivated by her anger at my removing her from The Argotist Online Facebook group. The malicious gossip inquestion, being her accusation that I called Bobbi “psychotic”, which she first mentioned in the OtherstreamFacebook group and then in a post she made at Fictionaut, which has now been removed by a Fictionautadministrator as it was defamatory.Ann then says in her response to my blog post:66
Side sent Bobbi quack remedies for cancer, she told me, and that when she lived in London, she metmany Brits who believed in false hope remedies such as those Side proposed to her.This is referring to the period when Bobbi and I were in communication with each other. I sent Bobbi various links toalternative cancer therapies. I wouldn’t characterise them as “quack” therapies, though, as most were beingdelivered by reputable hospitals and clinics.Ann then says in her response to my blog post:In a message dated 8/12/2012 11:49:19 P.M. Central Daylight Time, bobbilurie@.com writes:YES, JEFF SIDE’S BRAIN: DRINKING WATER WHILE STANDING ON YOUR HEAD AND SPEAKING INHUNGARIAN IS NOT A CURE FOR CANCER, JEFF SIDE’S BRAIN . . . YOU’LL JUST MAKE MY CANCERWORSE . . .I have no idea if Bobbi did actually write this or not. If she did, then I would like to take the opportunity to say that Ihave not advised her to drink water while standing on her head and speaking Hungarian, which, of course, sheknows full well is not true.Third Response to Ann Bogle17 August 2012Ann Bogle has made a further false accusation about me in the comments thread of one of her recent blog postsregarding me. Here is a link to the blog post:http://annbogle.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/american-candid.htmlThe comments stream is at the very end of this long blog post. The same comments stream can also be found inanother part of her blog, here:http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=21023072&postID=8315023444307361429She says (referring to the emails between her and myself that I posted in my first blog response to her initialaccusation about me): ‘Jeffrey Side posted emails he didn’t write’. If I didn’t write them, who did? Maybe shemistyped “he” for “I”, and the sentence should read: ‘Jeffrey Side posted emails I didn’t write’.It so, then why did Ann, in the Otherstream Facebook group thread where I also posted the same emails in responseto her accusing me there of having called her friend Bobbi Lurie “psychotic”, say: ‘Bobbi knows about thiscorrespondence that Jeff quotes here accurately’. This comment can be found here:http://annbogle.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/american-candid.htmlIt can also be found in the original Otherstream Facebook group thread, which will remain in that group as evidence,should Ann try to manipulate the reproduction of that thread she has posted on her blog. It is sad that Ann has had torecourse to a blatant lie about me.She also goes on to say, somewhat incoherently, in the comments stream of her blog:Marc Vincenz and Jeffrey Side have censored using their positions as administrators of web groups. Idon’t have Bobbi’s permission [I have her permission as of 4:29 p.m. today] to post the comment shewrote to me above that explains much that Jeffrey Side forgot to explain in his purple campaign. AnnyBallardini instantly assumes that I did what Jeffrey Side alleges in the flame threads he started atOtherstream and at Argotist. He deleted half the proof of it, and I deleted my own comments from onethread that he said intruded, yet he claimed that he deleted my comments.67
Page 1 and 2:
1
Page 3 and 4:
Cover image by Jake BerryCopyright
Page 5 and 6:
Odds and Ends: Essays, Blogs, Inter
Page 7 and 8:
EssaysThe following essays contain
Page 9 and 10:
Many people still think that high-f
Page 11 and 12:
His mind was distinguished by the c
Page 13 and 14:
Pound’s strategy was to offer a d
Page 15 and 16: Smith’s general contention is tha
Page 17 and 18: He also acknowledges the retrograde
Page 19 and 20: 72. Motion, p.3.73. Motion, p.3.74.
Page 21 and 22: reports on what they thought of the
Page 23 and 24: being switched off. But this is not
Page 25 and 26: poetry in the same way a novice art
Page 27 and 28: line is: ‘With all her young ones
Page 29 and 30: time to insist that they are fine A
Page 31 and 32: 2. Seamus Heaney, ‘The Redress of
Page 33 and 34: medium for Newton’s laws of motio
Page 35 and 36: as a critical methodology. This the
Page 37 and 38: Indeed, Geoffrey Hartman, in relati
Page 39 and 40: In an effort to be able better to j
Page 41 and 42: His criticism of Eliot extends to w
Page 43 and 44: himself, […] proposes something d
Page 45 and 46: process in service to humanistic an
Page 47 and 48: will transfigure the conditions and
Page 49 and 50: 11. The Poetical Works of William W
Page 51 and 52: Dialogue and estrangement (Macmilla
Page 53 and 54: sent him-there would be no need for
Page 55 and 56: Peter Porter in his review for Poet
Page 57 and 58: Marjorie Perloff:‘It’s very str
Page 59 and 60: biographies of Ginsberg and Kerouac
Page 61 and 62: Another Day for Kent Johnson26 Sept
Page 63 and 64: was edited by the independent John
Page 65: The only way I could consider doing
Page 69 and 70: Ann goes on to quote Bobbi as sayin
Page 71 and 72: I am satisfied with your posting yo
Page 73 and 74: the approach of the literary theori
Page 75 and 76: and get the convictionsto cause the
Page 77 and 78: Internet DiscussionsThe following a
Page 79 and 80: debatable) but for all practical pu
Page 81 and 82: in the poem is clear does not mean
Page 83 and 84: That seems to me to be a perfectly
Page 85 and 86: Jeffrey, I’m suddenly reminded of
Page 87 and 88: Something which is being overlooked
Page 89 and 90: what we mean by oblique, and who an
Page 91 and 92: public sphere have, in these partic
Page 93 and 94: Archameau would be also. I think hi
Page 95 and 96: Or to extend this slightly, he gene
Page 97 and 98: you if you wish.As I have said in t
Page 99 and 100: he knows more about the technical a
Page 101 and 102: Hi, Tim,I think when you suggest th
Page 103 and 104: I was saying that support for the i
Page 105 and 106: Tim Allen[Addressing Robin Hamilton
Page 107 and 108: to be presented, literature needs f
Page 109 and 110: Historicist-like’ or “corny”,
Page 111 and 112: PDF format and make them available
Page 113 and 114: Thanks to Drew and Tim for their ki
Page 115 and 116: still quite a lot of actual readers
Page 117 and 118:
a poet and writer, he decided to be
Page 119 and 120:
The NEA (US equivalent of AC) has a
Page 121 and 122:
ideal way to view poetry though, at
Page 123 and 124:
Tim AllenThe term “academic poetr
Page 125 and 126:
seems to be engaging with issues of
Page 127 and 128:
regard to critical articles, resear
Page 129 and 130:
InterviewsInterview with Ami Kaye o
Page 131 and 132:
Ami Kaye: How many submissions do y
Page 133 and 134:
Jeffrey Side: I only edit online ma
Page 135 and 136:
MiscellanyResponses to Critics-Part
Page 137 and 138:
Jamie McKendrick’s Second Respons
Page 139 and 140:
hung onto Heaney’s interview repl
Page 141 and 142:
Fenton isn’t quoted in the articl
Page 143 and 144:
lifetime’s work”? I like what H
Page 145 and 146:
think I’m just talking about tast
Page 147 and 148:
the latter third of the 20C writing
Page 149 and 150:
Rob Stanton’s Response in Jacket
Page 151 and 152:
Here I differ from Side, who sees H
Page 153 and 154:
Reznikoff, Oppen and Niedecker to p
Page 155 and 156:
Cambridge academic, ensuring public
Page 157 and 158:
This point is referring to Heaney
Page 159 and 160:
poet to have a collected edition pu
Page 161 and 162:
that literary studies scholarship a
Page 163 and 164:
Birkbeck University, and the Poetry
Page 165 and 166:
aware of the problematic status of
Page 167 and 168:
to Men in the early part of their a
Page 169 and 170:
accepted. Later she sent me some po
show all

Odds and Ends Essays, Blogs, Internet Discussions, Interviews and Miscellany

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?