16.06.2021 Views

Waikato Business News May/June 2021

Waikato Business News has for a quarter of a century been the voice of the region’s business community, a business community with a very real commitment to innovation and an ethos of co-operation.

Waikato Business News has for a quarter of a century been the voice of the region’s business community, a business community with a very real commitment to innovation and an ethos of co-operation.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Front-foot it or<br />

cross fingers?<br />

Does anyone else feel like <strong>May</strong> was crisis<br />

month? The HMC team sure had our fair<br />

share of issues and crises come across our<br />

desks recently.<br />

Complimentary Ed<br />

19.1x6<br />

part – that companies (just<br />

like people) make mistakes<br />

sometimes.<br />

And, you’ll put a lot of<br />

goodwill in the trust bank<br />

when you admit you’ve done<br />

wrong, apologise to those<br />

hurt and show proof of how<br />

you are rectifying the situation.<br />

And don’t forget to circle<br />

back at a future date to let<br />

people know how the situation<br />

has been resolved and<br />

why your organisation and<br />

your people are better for it.<br />

Since issues are on my<br />

mind, I thought I’d talk<br />

about one subject that<br />

comes up repeatedly when<br />

working with boards and<br />

leadership teams to manage<br />

reputational crises, in<br />

particular.<br />

Inevitably, as reputational<br />

issues emerge, there are<br />

going to be facts and stories<br />

that will damage your organisation’s<br />

reputation if and<br />

when they become public.<br />

So, how do you deal with<br />

those facts? Do you frontfoot<br />

them and lift the veil<br />

yourself by making them<br />

public? Or do you cross fingers<br />

hoping media, staff or<br />

stakeholders don’t uncover<br />

them?<br />

From my experience, in<br />

nearly every situation the<br />

best way to deal with a reputational<br />

issue is proactively<br />

and with honesty.<br />

I told a client recently, it’s<br />

like tearing off a plaster. Just<br />

do it, say it, and let’s deal<br />

with it.<br />

Taking the “front-foot”<br />

approach is far from easy<br />

- but doing the right thing<br />

in life rarely is, right? The<br />

initial announcement will<br />

be tough and you’ll need<br />

to brace yourself for what<br />

comes next. But the great<br />

thing about front-footing a<br />

negative situation is that you<br />

control the timing, which<br />

allows you to prepare for just<br />

about anything that comes<br />

your way.<br />

There are four good<br />

reasons to front-foot<br />

a reputational issue:<br />

Gives you time to plan<br />

PR AND COMMUNICATIONS<br />

> BY HEATHER CLAYCOMB<br />

The best thing about<br />

front-footing an issue is that<br />

you take control and you can<br />

plan when and how you’ll<br />

make the announcement.<br />

Work through what you’re<br />

going to say and think about<br />

all the communications<br />

Heather Claycomb is director of HMC Communications, a<br />

Hamilton-based, award-winning public relations agencys.<br />

you need to do. This might<br />

include staff briefing notes,<br />

emails to key stakeholders, a<br />

media release, social media<br />

posts, a website story and<br />

more.<br />

Once you pick the day and<br />

time, take the leap. Then,<br />

make sure your spokesperson<br />

– your Chair or CEO<br />

– has cleared the decks and<br />

is ready to talk to staff, take<br />

phone calls and do media<br />

interviews.<br />

Being available is incredibly<br />

important so you don’t<br />

look like you are hiding from<br />

the bad news.<br />

Avoids a defensive position<br />

Social media and the 24-hour<br />

news cycle means crises<br />

break online at any hour of<br />

the day or night. And when<br />

that happens and bad news<br />

comes to light unexpectedly,<br />

you’ll quickly be put in the<br />

defensive position. And<br />

anyone who’s played sport<br />

knows it is difficult to ‘win’<br />

when you don’t control the<br />

ball.<br />

If you’re caught unaware<br />

and start bumbling around<br />

asking your colleagues or<br />

advisors, “what should we<br />

say?,” there’s never going to<br />

be a good ending. Get on the<br />

offensive instead.<br />

Demonstrates integrity<br />

Your staff, customers and the<br />

community where you operate<br />

understand – for the most<br />

Shows you’re not hiding<br />

anything<br />

Public outrage can quickly<br />

gain momentum and skyrocket<br />

out of control when<br />

people think an organisation<br />

is trying to hide something.<br />

And when you don’t respond<br />

immediately when a negative<br />

situation comes to light, people<br />

will automatically assume<br />

you are hiding something.<br />

Be as transparent as you can<br />

in times of crisis and it will<br />

help you weather the reputation<br />

storm.<br />

So, if I’ve convinced you<br />

that front-footing is nearly<br />

always the best strategy, when<br />

is it not the right approach?<br />

When individual privacy<br />

issues are involved, or when<br />

there is a legal process taking<br />

place are two such instances<br />

which add complexity that<br />

must be taken into account.<br />

In summary, however,<br />

remember that crossing<br />

fingers is rarely the<br />

smart thing to do when a<br />

reputational issue rears its<br />

head.<br />

Instead, put on your big<br />

kid boots and front-foot it.<br />

When good employees go bad...<br />

Senga Allen<br />

Managing Director<br />

Everest – all about people TM<br />

What happens when<br />

one of your stars<br />

begins to underperform?<br />

What do you do?<br />

Have you ever considered<br />

it could be a bit of the old<br />

“chicken and the egg” conundrum<br />

– what comes first bad<br />

management or bad employee<br />

behaviour? In the long run<br />

it may not actually matter,<br />

but there is a mutual culpability<br />

that must be addressed.<br />

For employees, under-performing<br />

behaviour can manifest<br />

in lots of different ways<br />

– increased absenteeism,<br />

just doing enough to get by,<br />

low energy levels, decreased<br />

interaction<br />

with co-workers, reduced<br />

contribution to projects, negativity<br />

slipping into conversations<br />

– and the list goes on!<br />

For employers, a visible<br />

lack of “good management”<br />

can have a significant impact<br />

on the workplace. Research<br />

shows us that money isn’t the<br />

primary motivator for leaving<br />

a job. In fact it’s about 10th<br />

on the list. The biggest single<br />

reason good employees leave<br />

is because of the behaviour<br />

of their direct supervisor. So<br />

what contributes to ineffective<br />

management?<br />

• Lack of direct communication<br />

and information<br />

• Lack of clarity and the<br />

provision of standards/<br />

expectations<br />

• Lack of positive reinforcement<br />

or acknowledgement<br />

of successes<br />

• Lack of face-toface<br />

communication<br />

– these days<br />

there appears to<br />

an over-reliance on passive<br />

communication techniques<br />

such as electronic<br />

media to convey critical<br />

information rather than<br />

sitting down face-to-face.<br />

For employers,<br />

a visible lack<br />

of “good<br />

management” can<br />

have a significant<br />

impact on the<br />

workplace.<br />

Direct face-to-face communication<br />

might also enable you<br />

to find out if there are other or<br />

external factors which could<br />

be affecting their performance.<br />

If a good employee<br />

starts to perform poorly we<br />

need to examine why. Typically<br />

stars don’t get up<br />

one morning and make a<br />

decision to under-perform.<br />

Consider the<br />

following when<br />

diagnosing<br />

what might be affecting your<br />

star employee:<br />

• Does the employee have<br />

the capability to do the<br />

task – if they did it before,<br />

then they can do it again.<br />

• Has the employee been<br />

trained on the correct way<br />

of doing the job – how<br />

long ago was the training?<br />

If they’ve carried out the<br />

tasks correctly in the past,<br />

then it’s likely they can do<br />

it again properly.<br />

• Does the employee use<br />

the skill often enough to<br />

remember how to do the<br />

job next time?<br />

• Does the employee know<br />

he/she is doing it correctly/incorrectly?<br />

What quality checks are in<br />

place to give the employee<br />

feedback on their performance<br />

– who is responsible<br />

for giving that feedback?<br />

• Are you punishing exceptional<br />

performance? By<br />

this I mean – do you<br />

swamp your star with lots<br />

of extra projects because<br />

they are always capable of<br />

taking on more?<br />

• Are you rewarding poor<br />

performance? Has your<br />

superstar been switched<br />

off because they regularly<br />

stand by and watch you<br />

rescue poor performing<br />

employees by handing<br />

their work over to good<br />

employees – rather than<br />

dealing with the problem<br />

employee?<br />

There are always genuine<br />

reasons why performance<br />

slips away – our role as business<br />

owners and managers is<br />

to find out why.<br />

That might also include<br />

looking in the mirror and<br />

asking questions about<br />

our own management<br />

techniques.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!