Waikato Business News May/June 2021
Waikato Business News has for a quarter of a century been the voice of the region’s business community, a business community with a very real commitment to innovation and an ethos of co-operation.
Waikato Business News has for a quarter of a century been the voice of the region’s business community, a business community with a very real commitment to innovation and an ethos of co-operation.
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Front-foot it or<br />
cross fingers?<br />
Does anyone else feel like <strong>May</strong> was crisis<br />
month? The HMC team sure had our fair<br />
share of issues and crises come across our<br />
desks recently.<br />
Complimentary Ed<br />
19.1x6<br />
part – that companies (just<br />
like people) make mistakes<br />
sometimes.<br />
And, you’ll put a lot of<br />
goodwill in the trust bank<br />
when you admit you’ve done<br />
wrong, apologise to those<br />
hurt and show proof of how<br />
you are rectifying the situation.<br />
And don’t forget to circle<br />
back at a future date to let<br />
people know how the situation<br />
has been resolved and<br />
why your organisation and<br />
your people are better for it.<br />
Since issues are on my<br />
mind, I thought I’d talk<br />
about one subject that<br />
comes up repeatedly when<br />
working with boards and<br />
leadership teams to manage<br />
reputational crises, in<br />
particular.<br />
Inevitably, as reputational<br />
issues emerge, there are<br />
going to be facts and stories<br />
that will damage your organisation’s<br />
reputation if and<br />
when they become public.<br />
So, how do you deal with<br />
those facts? Do you frontfoot<br />
them and lift the veil<br />
yourself by making them<br />
public? Or do you cross fingers<br />
hoping media, staff or<br />
stakeholders don’t uncover<br />
them?<br />
From my experience, in<br />
nearly every situation the<br />
best way to deal with a reputational<br />
issue is proactively<br />
and with honesty.<br />
I told a client recently, it’s<br />
like tearing off a plaster. Just<br />
do it, say it, and let’s deal<br />
with it.<br />
Taking the “front-foot”<br />
approach is far from easy<br />
- but doing the right thing<br />
in life rarely is, right? The<br />
initial announcement will<br />
be tough and you’ll need<br />
to brace yourself for what<br />
comes next. But the great<br />
thing about front-footing a<br />
negative situation is that you<br />
control the timing, which<br />
allows you to prepare for just<br />
about anything that comes<br />
your way.<br />
There are four good<br />
reasons to front-foot<br />
a reputational issue:<br />
Gives you time to plan<br />
PR AND COMMUNICATIONS<br />
> BY HEATHER CLAYCOMB<br />
The best thing about<br />
front-footing an issue is that<br />
you take control and you can<br />
plan when and how you’ll<br />
make the announcement.<br />
Work through what you’re<br />
going to say and think about<br />
all the communications<br />
Heather Claycomb is director of HMC Communications, a<br />
Hamilton-based, award-winning public relations agencys.<br />
you need to do. This might<br />
include staff briefing notes,<br />
emails to key stakeholders, a<br />
media release, social media<br />
posts, a website story and<br />
more.<br />
Once you pick the day and<br />
time, take the leap. Then,<br />
make sure your spokesperson<br />
– your Chair or CEO<br />
– has cleared the decks and<br />
is ready to talk to staff, take<br />
phone calls and do media<br />
interviews.<br />
Being available is incredibly<br />
important so you don’t<br />
look like you are hiding from<br />
the bad news.<br />
Avoids a defensive position<br />
Social media and the 24-hour<br />
news cycle means crises<br />
break online at any hour of<br />
the day or night. And when<br />
that happens and bad news<br />
comes to light unexpectedly,<br />
you’ll quickly be put in the<br />
defensive position. And<br />
anyone who’s played sport<br />
knows it is difficult to ‘win’<br />
when you don’t control the<br />
ball.<br />
If you’re caught unaware<br />
and start bumbling around<br />
asking your colleagues or<br />
advisors, “what should we<br />
say?,” there’s never going to<br />
be a good ending. Get on the<br />
offensive instead.<br />
Demonstrates integrity<br />
Your staff, customers and the<br />
community where you operate<br />
understand – for the most<br />
Shows you’re not hiding<br />
anything<br />
Public outrage can quickly<br />
gain momentum and skyrocket<br />
out of control when<br />
people think an organisation<br />
is trying to hide something.<br />
And when you don’t respond<br />
immediately when a negative<br />
situation comes to light, people<br />
will automatically assume<br />
you are hiding something.<br />
Be as transparent as you can<br />
in times of crisis and it will<br />
help you weather the reputation<br />
storm.<br />
So, if I’ve convinced you<br />
that front-footing is nearly<br />
always the best strategy, when<br />
is it not the right approach?<br />
When individual privacy<br />
issues are involved, or when<br />
there is a legal process taking<br />
place are two such instances<br />
which add complexity that<br />
must be taken into account.<br />
In summary, however,<br />
remember that crossing<br />
fingers is rarely the<br />
smart thing to do when a<br />
reputational issue rears its<br />
head.<br />
Instead, put on your big<br />
kid boots and front-foot it.<br />
When good employees go bad...<br />
Senga Allen<br />
Managing Director<br />
Everest – all about people TM<br />
What happens when<br />
one of your stars<br />
begins to underperform?<br />
What do you do?<br />
Have you ever considered<br />
it could be a bit of the old<br />
“chicken and the egg” conundrum<br />
– what comes first bad<br />
management or bad employee<br />
behaviour? In the long run<br />
it may not actually matter,<br />
but there is a mutual culpability<br />
that must be addressed.<br />
For employees, under-performing<br />
behaviour can manifest<br />
in lots of different ways<br />
– increased absenteeism,<br />
just doing enough to get by,<br />
low energy levels, decreased<br />
interaction<br />
with co-workers, reduced<br />
contribution to projects, negativity<br />
slipping into conversations<br />
– and the list goes on!<br />
For employers, a visible<br />
lack of “good management”<br />
can have a significant impact<br />
on the workplace. Research<br />
shows us that money isn’t the<br />
primary motivator for leaving<br />
a job. In fact it’s about 10th<br />
on the list. The biggest single<br />
reason good employees leave<br />
is because of the behaviour<br />
of their direct supervisor. So<br />
what contributes to ineffective<br />
management?<br />
• Lack of direct communication<br />
and information<br />
• Lack of clarity and the<br />
provision of standards/<br />
expectations<br />
• Lack of positive reinforcement<br />
or acknowledgement<br />
of successes<br />
• Lack of face-toface<br />
communication<br />
– these days<br />
there appears to<br />
an over-reliance on passive<br />
communication techniques<br />
such as electronic<br />
media to convey critical<br />
information rather than<br />
sitting down face-to-face.<br />
For employers,<br />
a visible lack<br />
of “good<br />
management” can<br />
have a significant<br />
impact on the<br />
workplace.<br />
Direct face-to-face communication<br />
might also enable you<br />
to find out if there are other or<br />
external factors which could<br />
be affecting their performance.<br />
If a good employee<br />
starts to perform poorly we<br />
need to examine why. Typically<br />
stars don’t get up<br />
one morning and make a<br />
decision to under-perform.<br />
Consider the<br />
following when<br />
diagnosing<br />
what might be affecting your<br />
star employee:<br />
• Does the employee have<br />
the capability to do the<br />
task – if they did it before,<br />
then they can do it again.<br />
• Has the employee been<br />
trained on the correct way<br />
of doing the job – how<br />
long ago was the training?<br />
If they’ve carried out the<br />
tasks correctly in the past,<br />
then it’s likely they can do<br />
it again properly.<br />
• Does the employee use<br />
the skill often enough to<br />
remember how to do the<br />
job next time?<br />
• Does the employee know<br />
he/she is doing it correctly/incorrectly?<br />
What quality checks are in<br />
place to give the employee<br />
feedback on their performance<br />
– who is responsible<br />
for giving that feedback?<br />
• Are you punishing exceptional<br />
performance? By<br />
this I mean – do you<br />
swamp your star with lots<br />
of extra projects because<br />
they are always capable of<br />
taking on more?<br />
• Are you rewarding poor<br />
performance? Has your<br />
superstar been switched<br />
off because they regularly<br />
stand by and watch you<br />
rescue poor performing<br />
employees by handing<br />
their work over to good<br />
employees – rather than<br />
dealing with the problem<br />
employee?<br />
There are always genuine<br />
reasons why performance<br />
slips away – our role as business<br />
owners and managers is<br />
to find out why.<br />
That might also include<br />
looking in the mirror and<br />
asking questions about<br />
our own management<br />
techniques.