01.08.2021 Views

University Physics I - Classical Mechanics, 2019

University Physics I - Classical Mechanics, 2019

University Physics I - Classical Mechanics, 2019

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.7. ADVANCED TOPICS 107<br />

where the quantity ω = √ k/μ, andthetimet c is the time cart 1 first makes contact with the<br />

spring: t c =(x 2i − x 0 − x 1i )/v 1i .Thesolution(5.19) isvalidforaslongasthespringiscompressed,<br />

which is to say, for as long as x 12 (t) 0, which translates to the condition<br />

on t shown above.<br />

Having a solution for x 12 , we could now obtain explicit results for x 1 (t) andx 2 (t) separately, using<br />

the fact that x 1 = x cm −m 2 x 12 /(m 1 +m 2 ), and x 2 = x cm +m 1 x 12 /(m 1 +m 2 )(compareEqs.(4.10),<br />

in chapter 4), and finding the position of the center of mass as a function of time is a trivial problem,<br />

since it just moves with constant velocity.<br />

We do not, however, need to do any of this in order to generate the plots of the kinetic and potential<br />

energy shown in Fig. 5.2: the potential energy depends only on x 2 − x 1 , which is given explicitly<br />

by Eq. (5.19), and the kinetic energy is equal to K cm + K conv ,whereK cm is constant and K conv<br />

is given by Eq. (5.16), which can also be easily rewritten in terms of Eq. (5.19). The results are<br />

Eqs. (5.7) inthetext.<br />

5.7.2 Getting the potential energy function from collision data<br />

Consider the collision illustrated in Figure 3.4 (back in Chapter 3). Can we tell what the potential<br />

energy function is for the interaction between the two carts?<br />

At first sight, it may seem that all the information necessary to “reconstruct” the function U(x 1 −x 2 )<br />

is available already, at least in graphical form: From Figure 3.4 you could get the value of x 2 − x 1<br />

at any time t; then from Figure 4.5 you can get the value of K (in the elastic-collision scenario)<br />

for the same value of t; and then you could plot U = E − K (where E is the total energy) as a<br />

function of x 2 − x 1 .<br />

But there is a catch: Figure 3.4 shows that the colliding objects never get any closer than x 2 −x 1 ≃<br />

0.28 mm, so we have no way to tell what U(x 2 −x 1 ) is for smaller values of x 2 −x 1 . This is essentially<br />

the problem faced by particle physicists when they use collisions (which they do regularly) to try<br />

to determine the precise nature of the interactions between the particles they study!<br />

You can check this for yourself. The functions I used for x 1 (t) andx 2 (t) infigure3.4 are<br />

(<br />

)<br />

x 1 (t) = 1 (2t − 10) erf(10 − 2t) + 10 erf(10) + t − e−4(t−5)2<br />

√ − 5<br />

3<br />

π<br />

(<br />

)<br />

x 2 (t) = 1 (5 − t)erf(10− 2t) − 5 erf(10) + t + e−4(t−5)2<br />

3<br />

2 √ π<br />

(5.20)<br />

Here, “erf” is the so-called “error function,” which you can find in any decent library of mathemat-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!