01.08.2021 Views

University Physics I - Classical Mechanics, 2019

University Physics I - Classical Mechanics, 2019

University Physics I - Classical Mechanics, 2019

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

126 CHAPTER 6. INTERACTIONS, PART 2: FORCES<br />

drag force is proportional to the object’s speed, whereas for high velocities it is proportional to the<br />

square of the speed.<br />

In principle, one can use the appropriate drag formula together with Newton’s second law to<br />

calculate the effect of air resistance on a simple object thrown or dropped; in practice, this requires<br />

a somewhat more advanced math than we will be using this course, and the formulas themselves<br />

are complicated, so I will not introduce them here.<br />

One aspect of air resistance that deserves to be mentioned is what is known as “terminal velocity”<br />

(which I already introduced briefly in Section 2.3). Since air resistance increases with speed, if<br />

you drop an object from a sufficiently great height, the upwards drag force on it will increase as it<br />

accelerates, until at some point it will become as large as the downward force of gravity. At that<br />

point, the net force on the object is zero, so it stops accelerating, and from that point on it continues<br />

to fall with constant velocity. When the Greek philosopher Aristotle was trying to figure out the<br />

motion of falling bodies, he reasoned that, since air was just another fluid, he could slow down the<br />

fall (in order to study it better) without changing the physics by dropping objects in liquids instead<br />

of air. The problem with this approach, though, is that terminal velocity is reached much faster in a<br />

liquid than in air, so Aristotle missed entirely the early stage of approximately constant acceleration,<br />

and concluded (wrongly) that the natural way all objects fell was with constant velocity. It took<br />

almost two thousand years until Galileo disproved that notion by coming up with a better method<br />

to slow down the falling motion—namely, by using inclined planes.<br />

6.4 Free-body diagrams<br />

As Figure 6.1 shows, trying to draw every single force acting on every single object can very quickly<br />

become pretty messy. And anyway, this is not usually what we need: what we need is to separate<br />

cleanly all the forces acting on any given object, one object at a time, so we can apply Newton’s<br />

second law, F net = ma, to each object individually.<br />

In order to accomplish this, we use what are known as free-body diagrams. In a free-body diagram,<br />

a potentially very complicated object is replaced symbolically by a dot or a small circle, and all<br />

the forces acting on the object are drawn (approximately to scale and properly labeled) as acting<br />

on the dot. Regardless of whether a force is a pulling or pushing force, the convention is to always<br />

draw it as a vector that originates at the dot. If the system is accelerating, it is also a good idea to<br />

indicate the acceleration’s direction also somewhere on the diagram.<br />

The figure below (next page) shows, as an example, a free-body diagram for block 1 in Figure 6.2,<br />

in the presence of both a nonzero acceleration and a kinetic friction force. The diagram includes<br />

all the forces, even gravity and the normal force, which were left out of the picture in Figure 6.2.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!