01.08.2021 Views

University Physics I - Classical Mechanics, 2019

University Physics I - Classical Mechanics, 2019

University Physics I - Classical Mechanics, 2019

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

210 CHAPTER 9. ROTATIONAL DYNAMICS<br />

For the situation shown in Fig. 9.9, if we take down the plane as the positive direction for linear<br />

motion, and clockwise torques as negative, we have to write a cm = −Rα. In the direction perpendicular<br />

to the plane, we conclude from (9.35) thatF n = Mgcos θ, an equation we will not actually<br />

need 8 ; in the direction along the plane, we have<br />

Ma cm = Mgsin θ − F s (9.38)<br />

and the torque equation just gives −F s R = Iα,whichwitha cm = −Rα becomes<br />

F s R = I a cm<br />

R<br />

(9.39)<br />

We can eliminate F s in between these two equations and solve for a cm :<br />

a cm =<br />

g sin θ<br />

1+I/(MR 2 )<br />

(9.40)<br />

Now you can see why, earlier in the semester, we were always careful to assume that all the objects<br />

we sent down inclined planes were sliding, not rolling! The acceleration for a rolling object is never<br />

equal to simply g sin θ. Most remarkably, the correction factor depends only on the shape of the<br />

rolling object, and not on its mass or size, since the ratio of I to MR 2 is independent of m and R<br />

for any given geometry. Thus, for instance, for a disk, I = 1 2 MR2 ,soa cm = 2 3g sin θ, whereasfora<br />

hoop, I = MR 2 ,soa cm = 1 2g sin θ. So any disk or solid cylinder will always roll down the incline<br />

faster than any hoop or hollow cylinder, regardless of mass or size.<br />

This rather surprising result may be better understood in terms of energy. First, let me show (a<br />

result that is somewhat overdue) that for a rigid object that is rotating around an axis passing<br />

through its center of mass with angular velocity ω we can write the total kinetic energy as<br />

K = K cm + K rot = 1 2 Mv2 cm + 1 2 Iω2 (9.41)<br />

This is because for every particle the velocity can be written as ⃗v = ⃗v cm + v ⃗′ ,wherev ⃗′ is the velocity<br />

relative to the center of mass (that is, in the CM frame). Since in this frame the motion is a simple<br />

rotation, we have |v ′ | = ωr, wherer is the particle’s distance to the axis. Therefore, the kinetic<br />

energy of that particle will be<br />

1<br />

2 mv2 = 1 2 ⃗v · ⃗v = 1 (<br />

2 m ⃗v cm + v ⃗ )<br />

′ ·<br />

(⃗v cm + v ⃗ )<br />

′<br />

= 1 2 mv2 cm + 1 2 mv′ 2 + m⃗vcm · ⃗v ′<br />

= 1 2 mv2 cm + 1 2 mr2 ω 2 + ⃗v cm · ⃗p ′ (9.42)<br />

8 Unless we were trying to answer a question such as “how steep does the plane have to be for rolling without<br />

slipping to become impossible?”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!