19.01.2022 Views

Rhosarian 2019

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The <strong>Rhosarian</strong> 1/19<br />

deliberately did not charge for overhead costs, nor<br />

did we look for any payment for management,<br />

either for myself or for our black managers. We<br />

grew a good crop for them; which gave them a<br />

gross margin of over Z$350 million, which in<br />

2003 was a substantial amount of money. We had<br />

kept our toe in the door, but they had<br />

simultaneously put their foot in and were using<br />

the agreement to play for time. They did not<br />

occupy our house. They bought only a minimal<br />

amount of their own equipment and did no capital<br />

development at all, although that had been required<br />

under their offer letter.<br />

Scene 9<br />

They then reneged on the terms of our<br />

agreement and in September 2003 told us to get<br />

out of the house and off the farm. They gave us 48<br />

hours to pack up both farm houses (our own house<br />

and that of our grandson Nicholas). They refused<br />

to allow me or any of my family onto the farm to<br />

pack up, so my secretary and our two black<br />

managers had to do it all. In the haste a number of<br />

documents were damaged or lost. I was glad that<br />

Wendy was away in Australia and did not have to<br />

go through that traumatic experience. We later<br />

managed to get agreement that we could continue<br />

farming our side of the farm, and I travelled out on<br />

most days from Harare. But we still had the<br />

Section 8 hanging over us, under which we could<br />

still be displaced, invaded or kicked out at any<br />

time.<br />

During those first twelve months the situation<br />

had gradually become more difficult, as the<br />

occupants intruded more and more on to our side<br />

of the farm. They were supposed, under the A2<br />

scheme, either to live on the farm and run it<br />

themselves, or to employ a manager. ...<br />

Labour Legislation<br />

In addition to all these problems, labour<br />

legislation made farmers pay a very substantial<br />

redundancy package to workers who had<br />

previously been permanently employed and who<br />

now had to leave because of the farm take-overs.<br />

This package included items such as outstanding<br />

leave pay, transportation to their homes, and one<br />

month’s pay for every six months worked,<br />

calculated at current wage rates with no ceiling.<br />

People who had worked for us for many years had<br />

LOOKING BACK<br />

October <strong>2019</strong><br />

37<br />

enormous gratuities, far more than they could have<br />

expected, and this was on top of the normal pension<br />

scheme to which we had been contributing for<br />

them for many years. After we made these<br />

redundancy payments we still continued to employ<br />

those workers who wished to stay on, but under a<br />

new contract. ... On some farms the packages were<br />

so crippling that farmers were unable to pay them<br />

even after selling their assets. We had to payout<br />

over Z$75 million in 2003 and 2004, at that time an<br />

enormous amount of money. ...<br />

Failure to Implement<br />

In May 2003, the President appointed a<br />

commission to advise government on land<br />

settlement and to plan the future. In fact, it was<br />

nothing more than a delaying tactic. Headed by Dr<br />

Charles Utete, who, for many years had been the<br />

Chief Secretary to the President and Cabinet, it had<br />

some good men on it, though I would have preferred<br />

fewer academics and more practitioners. ...<br />

The Utete Commission did a thorough job and<br />

exposed many people who were supposed to have<br />

only one farm but had grabbed up to half a dozen.<br />

They compiled a list of existing farmers who were<br />

prepared to subdivide and co-exist and who were<br />

working as far as possible on the original formula<br />

- one farmer, one farm - within the maximum<br />

hectarage allowed for that Natural Region.<br />

We had two meetings with this task force,<br />

constructive, congenial and forward-looking, and<br />

they quickly realized the deficiencies of our two<br />

occupants.<br />

When they finished their report at the end of<br />

2003, they presented it to the President, who<br />

accepted it. It was put to the Politburo and Central<br />

Committee of ZANU(PF) and eventually to<br />

Parliament, all of whom accepted its<br />

recommendations, though few were implemented.<br />

The Final Blow<br />

By 2004, I was living in Harare, so unsettled<br />

and threatening had the situation become. Then we<br />

were struck another blow, Wendy, my wife of 58<br />

years, died on 20 January 2005. A few days later<br />

the gates to Mount Lothian, the farm were finally<br />

closed. I was warned by the Judge and the Retired<br />

Colonel of violence should I attempt to get back<br />

onto the farm.<br />

(See MSASA MAIL pp 9-11)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!