Oral Abstract Session 01 - Global HIV Vaccine Enterprise
Oral Abstract Session 01 - Global HIV Vaccine Enterprise
Oral Abstract Session 01 - Global HIV Vaccine Enterprise
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
POSTERS<br />
Posters<br />
Topic 3: B Cell Immunology and Antibody Functions<br />
P03.31<br />
Structural Comparison of Somatically Related PG9<br />
and PG16 in Complex with Their Epitope Reveals<br />
Differences in Glycan Recognition<br />
M. Pancera 1 , J.S. McLellan 1 , S. Shahzad-ul-Hussan 1 , N. Doria-<br />
Rose 1 , B. Zhang 1 , Y. Yang 1 , D.R. Burton 1 , W.C. Koff 1 , C.A.<br />
Bewley 1 , P.D. Kwong 1<br />
1 NIH/NIAID/VRC, Bethesda, MD, USA<br />
Background: The somatically related antibodies, PG9 and PG16,<br />
neutralize 70-80% of <strong>HIV</strong>-1 isolates and bind a glycosylated<br />
epitope in the V1/V2 domain of <strong>HIV</strong>-1 gp120. Mutations in<br />
V1/V2, and sometimes V3 depending on the <strong>HIV</strong>-1 strain,<br />
affect neutralization and a glycan on Asn160 is required for<br />
neutralization. Both antibodies also preferentially bind the native<br />
trimer over monomeric gp120, especially PG16. The structure of<br />
PG9 in complex with its epitope, a scaffolded V1/V2 from <strong>HIV</strong>-1<br />
strain ZM109, was recently solved and showed that PG9 targets a<br />
site of vulnerability comprising 2 glycans and a β-strand.<br />
Methods: To understand the differences in binding properties<br />
from these two somatically related antibodies, we first assessed<br />
their binding to monomeric gp120 and scaffolded V1/V2 proteins<br />
with different glycan types (oligomannose, hybrid, and complex).<br />
In order for PG16 to bind the scaffolded V1/V2, the protein had to<br />
be expressed in mammalian cells in the presence of swainsonine,<br />
which inhibits glycan maturation past the hybrid state. A stable<br />
complex could be obtained between PG16 and a scaffolded V1/<br />
V2 domain from ZM109, and this complex was crystallized.<br />
Results: Although the structure of PG16 bound to scaffolded V1/<br />
V2 resembled that of PG9, some differences were seen: 1) PG16<br />
binding to the β-strand is weaker than PG9 with fewer charged<br />
interactions, 2) PG16 interacts with a hybrid glycan at position<br />
N173. The difference in binding recognition of PG9 and PG16<br />
to monomeric gp120 depends on the type of glycans present.<br />
PG16 binds the protein portion of V1/V2 weaker than PG9 and<br />
this might explain the higher affinity of PG9 for the monomer.<br />
PG16 has evolved a second glycan site to compensate for weaker<br />
peptide interaction.<br />
Conclusion: The results show the importance of polyclonal<br />
response in infected individual to combat <strong>HIV</strong>-1, and in this case,<br />
to differential glycosylation.<br />
132<br />
AIDS <strong>Vaccine</strong> 2<strong>01</strong>2<br />
P03.32<br />
Neutralizing and Non-Neutralizing Antibody<br />
Responses in <strong>HIV</strong>-1 Subtype C Chronically Infected<br />
Patients with Divergent Rates of Disease Progression<br />
D. Archary 1 , R. Rong 2 , M.L. Gordon 1 , S. Boliar 3 , E.S. Gray 4 ,<br />
A. Dugast 5 , T. Hermanus 6 , P.J. Goulder 7 , H.M. Coovadia 8 ,<br />
L. Morris 6 , G. Alter 5 , C.A. Derdeyn 3 , T. Ndung’u 1<br />
1 University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa; 2 Jiaotong-<br />
Liverpool University, Suzhou, China, China; 3 Emory University,<br />
Atlanta, GA, USA; 4 University of Western Australia, Australia;<br />
5 Ragon Institute, Boston, MA, USA; 6 National Institute for<br />
Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa; 7 Oxford<br />
University, United Kingdom (Great Britain); 8 University of<br />
KwaZulu Natal, Durban, South Africa<br />
Background: Development of an efficacious <strong>HIV</strong>-1 vaccine able<br />
to elicit the production of broadly neutralizing antibodies (nAbs),<br />
capable of retaining potent activity against a diverse panel of viral<br />
isolates remains a significant challenge. The evolutionary forces<br />
that shape envelope and ensuing nAb and non-neutralizing<br />
antibodies in <strong>HIV</strong>-1 subtype C are incompletely understood and<br />
these two parameters have been rarely studied concurrently.<br />
Methods: We characterized patterns of virus-specific nAbs<br />
and non-neutralizing antibodies in four slow progressors and<br />
four progressors with chronic <strong>HIV</strong>-1 subtype C infection, over<br />
a median of 21 months. Single cycle neutralization assays was<br />
performed. In addition, the binding affinities of <strong>HIV</strong>-specific<br />
immunoglobulins (IgGs) and the affinities of the IgGs to various<br />
Fcγ receptors (FcγRs) were assessed.<br />
Results: NAbs evolved significantly in progressors (p=0.003) from<br />
study entry to study exit. NAb IC50 titers significantly correlated<br />
with amino acid lengths for V1-V2 (p=0.04), C3-V5 (p=0.03) and<br />
V1-V5 (p=0.04). Both groups displayed preferential heterologous<br />
activity against the subtype C panel. Both groups displayed<br />
preferential heterologous activity against the subtype C panel.<br />
There were no significant differences in breadth of responses<br />
between the groups for either subtype A or C. Neutralization<br />
breadth and titers to subtype B reference strains was significantly<br />
higher in progressors compared to slow progressors (both<br />
p