24.12.2012 Views

Oral Abstract Session 01 - Global HIV Vaccine Enterprise

Oral Abstract Session 01 - Global HIV Vaccine Enterprise

Oral Abstract Session 01 - Global HIV Vaccine Enterprise

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

POSTERS<br />

Posters<br />

Topic 3: B Cell Immunology and Antibody Functions<br />

P03.31<br />

Structural Comparison of Somatically Related PG9<br />

and PG16 in Complex with Their Epitope Reveals<br />

Differences in Glycan Recognition<br />

M. Pancera 1 , J.S. McLellan 1 , S. Shahzad-ul-Hussan 1 , N. Doria-<br />

Rose 1 , B. Zhang 1 , Y. Yang 1 , D.R. Burton 1 , W.C. Koff 1 , C.A.<br />

Bewley 1 , P.D. Kwong 1<br />

1 NIH/NIAID/VRC, Bethesda, MD, USA<br />

Background: The somatically related antibodies, PG9 and PG16,<br />

neutralize 70-80% of <strong>HIV</strong>-1 isolates and bind a glycosylated<br />

epitope in the V1/V2 domain of <strong>HIV</strong>-1 gp120. Mutations in<br />

V1/V2, and sometimes V3 depending on the <strong>HIV</strong>-1 strain,<br />

affect neutralization and a glycan on Asn160 is required for<br />

neutralization. Both antibodies also preferentially bind the native<br />

trimer over monomeric gp120, especially PG16. The structure of<br />

PG9 in complex with its epitope, a scaffolded V1/V2 from <strong>HIV</strong>-1<br />

strain ZM109, was recently solved and showed that PG9 targets a<br />

site of vulnerability comprising 2 glycans and a β-strand.<br />

Methods: To understand the differences in binding properties<br />

from these two somatically related antibodies, we first assessed<br />

their binding to monomeric gp120 and scaffolded V1/V2 proteins<br />

with different glycan types (oligomannose, hybrid, and complex).<br />

In order for PG16 to bind the scaffolded V1/V2, the protein had to<br />

be expressed in mammalian cells in the presence of swainsonine,<br />

which inhibits glycan maturation past the hybrid state. A stable<br />

complex could be obtained between PG16 and a scaffolded V1/<br />

V2 domain from ZM109, and this complex was crystallized.<br />

Results: Although the structure of PG16 bound to scaffolded V1/<br />

V2 resembled that of PG9, some differences were seen: 1) PG16<br />

binding to the β-strand is weaker than PG9 with fewer charged<br />

interactions, 2) PG16 interacts with a hybrid glycan at position<br />

N173. The difference in binding recognition of PG9 and PG16<br />

to monomeric gp120 depends on the type of glycans present.<br />

PG16 binds the protein portion of V1/V2 weaker than PG9 and<br />

this might explain the higher affinity of PG9 for the monomer.<br />

PG16 has evolved a second glycan site to compensate for weaker<br />

peptide interaction.<br />

Conclusion: The results show the importance of polyclonal<br />

response in infected individual to combat <strong>HIV</strong>-1, and in this case,<br />

to differential glycosylation.<br />

132<br />

AIDS <strong>Vaccine</strong> 2<strong>01</strong>2<br />

P03.32<br />

Neutralizing and Non-Neutralizing Antibody<br />

Responses in <strong>HIV</strong>-1 Subtype C Chronically Infected<br />

Patients with Divergent Rates of Disease Progression<br />

D. Archary 1 , R. Rong 2 , M.L. Gordon 1 , S. Boliar 3 , E.S. Gray 4 ,<br />

A. Dugast 5 , T. Hermanus 6 , P.J. Goulder 7 , H.M. Coovadia 8 ,<br />

L. Morris 6 , G. Alter 5 , C.A. Derdeyn 3 , T. Ndung’u 1<br />

1 University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa; 2 Jiaotong-<br />

Liverpool University, Suzhou, China, China; 3 Emory University,<br />

Atlanta, GA, USA; 4 University of Western Australia, Australia;<br />

5 Ragon Institute, Boston, MA, USA; 6 National Institute for<br />

Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa; 7 Oxford<br />

University, United Kingdom (Great Britain); 8 University of<br />

KwaZulu Natal, Durban, South Africa<br />

Background: Development of an efficacious <strong>HIV</strong>-1 vaccine able<br />

to elicit the production of broadly neutralizing antibodies (nAbs),<br />

capable of retaining potent activity against a diverse panel of viral<br />

isolates remains a significant challenge. The evolutionary forces<br />

that shape envelope and ensuing nAb and non-neutralizing<br />

antibodies in <strong>HIV</strong>-1 subtype C are incompletely understood and<br />

these two parameters have been rarely studied concurrently.<br />

Methods: We characterized patterns of virus-specific nAbs<br />

and non-neutralizing antibodies in four slow progressors and<br />

four progressors with chronic <strong>HIV</strong>-1 subtype C infection, over<br />

a median of 21 months. Single cycle neutralization assays was<br />

performed. In addition, the binding affinities of <strong>HIV</strong>-specific<br />

immunoglobulins (IgGs) and the affinities of the IgGs to various<br />

Fcγ receptors (FcγRs) were assessed.<br />

Results: NAbs evolved significantly in progressors (p=0.003) from<br />

study entry to study exit. NAb IC50 titers significantly correlated<br />

with amino acid lengths for V1-V2 (p=0.04), C3-V5 (p=0.03) and<br />

V1-V5 (p=0.04). Both groups displayed preferential heterologous<br />

activity against the subtype C panel. Both groups displayed<br />

preferential heterologous activity against the subtype C panel.<br />

There were no significant differences in breadth of responses<br />

between the groups for either subtype A or C. Neutralization<br />

breadth and titers to subtype B reference strains was significantly<br />

higher in progressors compared to slow progressors (both<br />

p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!