24.12.2012 Views

Oral Abstract Session 01 - Global HIV Vaccine Enterprise

Oral Abstract Session 01 - Global HIV Vaccine Enterprise

Oral Abstract Session 01 - Global HIV Vaccine Enterprise

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

POSTERS<br />

Posters<br />

Topic 4: Clinical <strong>Vaccine</strong> Trials and Trial Site Challenges<br />

P04.23 LB<br />

Screen Failure in Phase I <strong>HIV</strong> Clinical Trials In Soweto,<br />

South Africa: An Opportunity For Care<br />

F. Laher 1 , M. Mamba 1 , K. Otwombe 1 , G.E. Gray 1<br />

1 Perinatal <strong>HIV</strong> Research Unit, Johannesburg, South Africa<br />

Background: Reasons for screen failures are evaluated for<br />

three phase 1 <strong>HIV</strong> vaccine clinical trials recruiting healthy lowrisk<br />

participants at the Perinatal <strong>HIV</strong> Research Unit: SAAVI102/<br />

HVTN073 and SAAVI103/HVTN086 (the first trials evaluating<br />

a Clade C vaccine, Novartis Subtype C gp140 with MF59<br />

adjuvant boosting SAAVI DNA-C2 and SAAVI MVA-C vaccine)<br />

and IAVIB003/HVTN091 (Ad26 and Ad35 ENV vaccines).<br />

Recruitment strategies involved a pre-screening programme,<br />

clinics and community outreach.<br />

Methods: Protocol-specific eligibility was determined using<br />

assessments of understanding, risk behaviour, medical<br />

history, physical examination, blood and urine testing, and for<br />

HVTN073 and 086, electrocardiograms. Descriptive analysis and<br />

multivariate logistic regression of age, trial group and gender<br />

were performed.<br />

Results: Between June 2009-2<strong>01</strong>2, 225 participants(females=24%),<br />

median age 22 years(IQR:20-25) were screened. Overall 53%<br />

were ineligible, 60% of females vs. 51% of males (p=0.2). Site<br />

screening-to-enrolment ratios for 073, 086 and 091 were<br />

2.1:1, 2.3:1 and 1.7:1 respectively. Medical abnormalities<br />

contributed 59% (n=70) of ineligibility reasons, chiefly urine<br />

abnormalities (n=12/70 where eleven displayed microscopic<br />

blood/haemoglobin, seven with leucocyte esterase and one had<br />

proteinuria), abnormal ECG (n=12), raised liver enzymes (n=10),<br />

raised blood pressure (n=9), low white cells (n=8) and hepatitis<br />

B (HBsAg+ve) or C (anti HCV+) (n=7). Other criteria excluded<br />

41%(n=49) e.g. incomplete screening before enrolment closure<br />

(n=16), high-risk sexual behaviors (n=15), inability to comply with<br />

protocol (n=11), enrolment in another study (n=3), substance<br />

abuse (n=2, both cannabis-users), and poor understanding (n=2).<br />

In multivariate analysis, increasing age (OR 1.081, CI:1.007-1.16,<br />

p=0.032) predicted ineligibility but gender did not (OR: 0.67, CI:<br />

0.35-1.3, p=0.24). HVTN073&086 participants were more likely<br />

to be ineligible than HVTN091 (OR 2.2, CI:1.1-4.5, p=0.023).<br />

Conclusion: Screen failures in phase 1 vaccine trials in Soweto<br />

provide young people opportunities for care, especially through<br />

blood pressure, urine, risk behaviour and hepatitis B/C screening.<br />

Older participants and those in protocols stipulating ECG criteria<br />

were more likely to fail screening.<br />

160<br />

AIDS <strong>Vaccine</strong> 2<strong>01</strong>2<br />

P04.24 LB<br />

<strong>HIV</strong> <strong>Vaccine</strong> Trial Safety And Retention Among 18-20<br />

Year Olds In The HVTN 503/Phambili Study Support<br />

The Inclusion Of Adolescents In Future Trials<br />

J.E. Volk 1 , N.A. Hessol 2 , G.E. Gray 3 , J.G. Kublin 4 , G. Churchyard 5 ,<br />

K. Mlisana 6 , M. Nchabeleng 7 , S.P. Buchbinder 8 , L. Bekker 9<br />

1 University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA,<br />

USA; 2 Departments of Clinical Pharmacy and of Medicine,<br />

UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA; 3 Perinatal <strong>HIV</strong> Research<br />

Unit, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South<br />

Africa; 4 <strong>HIV</strong> <strong>Vaccine</strong> Trials Network, Fred Hutchinson Cancer<br />

Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA; 5 Aurum Institute for<br />

Health Research, Klerksdorp, South Africa; 6 Department of<br />

Medical Microbiology, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Congella,<br />

South Africa; 7 Medunsa <strong>HIV</strong> Clinical Research Unit, University<br />

of Limpopo, Limpopo, South Africa; 8 Department of Public<br />

Health, <strong>HIV</strong> Research Section, San Francisco, CA, USA; 9 The<br />

Desmond Tutu <strong>HIV</strong> Centre, University of Cape Town, Cape<br />

Town, South Africa<br />

Background: Worldwide, many adolescents, especially women,<br />

acquire <strong>HIV</strong> before age 18. Yet to date, no <strong>HIV</strong> vaccine trials have<br />

enrolled adolescents. Reasons for excluding adolescents from<br />

these trials include regulations protecting vulnerable subjects<br />

and concerns regarding informed consent, social harms, adverse<br />

events, and loss to follow-up.<br />

Methods: Using data from the HVTN 503/Phambili study, a<br />

multisite phase 2b double-blind RCT in South Africa, motivations<br />

for joining the trial, adverse events, social harms, and loss to<br />

follow-up were compared between young adults (18-20 years-old)<br />

and adults ≥21 years-old using bivariate and multivariate analyses.<br />

Results: Young adults (n=238) were less likely than older<br />

participants (n=563) to report joining the vaccine trial for<br />

monetary incentives (10.5% vs. 16.3%, p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!